Readers Reply to Oscar White

From S. Africa:

Cant really disagree with you, but please … We white South

Africans know our wrongs of the past. But please dont lump us in with the imperial “coalition of the

willing”. We had nothing to do with that one!

Cheers

Altus

Momberg
Die Burger

**********
Affirmative action for the Oscars? You are seriously disturbed. —

Anonymous

**********
An interesting column, for which I thank you.

It was not lost on me that last week’s winning Project Manager on THE APPRENTICE, Heidi, was

white. She was directing a team of two other whites and two blacks. Their team won, and normally, the

whole team would enjoy a reward. But last week’s reward was a helicopter tour of Manhatten, and there

were only three seats available.

Guess who got to ride?

Yours

sincerely,
MG Matejic

**********
Academy Awards

“To Kill a

Mockingbird” is one of my favorite movies, but like most movies about the civil rights era-think of

“Mississippi Burning” – whites are cast the “real” heroes. Sydney Poitier “In the Heat of the

Night,” is an exception, but Rod Steiger rather than Sydney Poitier won the

Oscar.

William B. Case

**********
Greg-

A fine

exploding of Oscar night on CounterPunch.org. Your geography lesson about the stars and presenters is

priceless.

I watched the show and was quickly disgusted with the state-sanctioned humor

of Billy Crystal and Bob Hope, and also with Michael Moore embarrassing his supporters once more.

Adding in the horror of Errol Morris receiving an award, it was a typical Oscar night. The only thing

that’s left to do is read Peter Travers’ yearly postmortem on the Academy’s choices in Rolling

Stone.

For what it’s worth I’m a longtime Michael Moore fan who is horrified at his

recent behavior – lashing out at Mumia, endorsing Wesley Clark.

Cheers,
Dave

Patten
Taunton, MA

**********
good one on counterpunch on the oscars,

white bread and mayonaisse. Of course, black folk in this country, even those who call themselves

African, still consider themselves American first and foremost, no matter how bad they may be treated.

And their leadership wether it be political or cultural has long lost their base in the black

institutions that integration was
meant to destroy.

Once upon a time black folk

controlled what how their children were educated, the stores they shopped in, the very institutions

that were critical to their lives. Today, what do black folk control outside of their churches?

Wouldnt you agree integration was the most effective tool to destroy black

institutions? As for the oscars, what has really changed?

Thomas C. Mountain

**********
Note: In the article “Oscar White?”, I tried to convey a complex

response to the Oscar telecast that appreciated the individual talent displayed, including Billy

Crystal, but critiqued the group dynamic. And that is how I undestand the logic of affirmative

action.

Affirmative action pays special attention to the collective patterns of

behavior, how the group acts as a group.

To the brief note that claims I am “seriously

disturbed” I offer a brief counter suggestion. Why can’t the Oscars be more like the Grammys? Like

the Grammys, perhaps the Oscars could include market categories that would help diversify the talent?

There was one email that I have permission to post, but which I have decided not to.

As the editor of an anti-racist site, I am tempted to display comments that I consider racist, in order

to show the contours of the problem. But rather than post the raw language, I will summarize and

discuss the point of view.

The email in question alleges that black actors deserve no

respect because they only portray characters that are either too shocking or too submissive. The

writer wants to see role model characters that work hard and DO NOT try to be

African.

The email, like some others I have received, also conveys an impression that I

am not white.

Well, it is interesting that the writer does not complain about white

actors who win awards for playing characters who are shocking and quite non-American. “Monster”

presents a dramatically shocking character, for example. Not a role model.

“Monster”

also says something about the meaning of shocking, because in today’s cultural environment, white

violence always counts as less shocking than black sexuality. Janet Jackson and her brother pay a

heavy price for being “too shocking” in their sexuality. Meanwhile, you can make your own list of

networked images of violence that will count as family entertainment.

As for the

argument that hard-working role models are needed, eleven Oscars went to a film that did not demand

simple conformity to a middle-class lifestyle. Characters could be Hobbits, Elves, or Trolls. They

did not have to “try” to be hard-working Americans in order to qualify for record-breaking awards.

So the email expresses a double standard that demands from Black actors a certain

conforminty that is not expected from white actors.

The writer goes on to say that

Japanese Americans provide a better model. Again, the argument is representative of certain racist

trends. The writer perceives Japanese American as more “assimilationist” and therefore more

acceptable. But the argument has at least two flaws.

First, my complaint was about a

lack of divesity at the academy awards. If Japanese Americans were indeed more acceptable to white

audiences, for the reasons alleged, then why are there no prominent stars to prove it?

Second, the writer is really calling for diversity that is not diverse. By presenting a thoroughly

assimilationist demand, the writer exemplifies the problem with Oscar White–how it does not

sufficiently challenge assimilationist attitudes.

Integration of opportunity should not

carry the pre-requisite of cultural assimiliation. In fact, the whole “Diversity” rationale for

affirmative action presumes that we can learn a lot from each other.

And please do not

assume that I am not white. If you want to backlash on my opinions, please don’t drag other folks

into your circle of attack.

Finally, I can sympathize with folks who are disappointed at

Michael Moore’s fling with real-politik (and his ethno-centrism) but on Oscar night he was trampled by

an Elephant! Do we have to paint a picture?

Comments

Leave a comment