A headline in the Dallas Morning News fairly represents the tone and content of a story: “Tales of terrorists breaching border overblown, so far.” Indeed it is a long story about what “could” occur, but hasn’t occurred. A curious bit of news.
On the other hand, immigrant families from around the world continue to be abused by USA immigration authorities in Dallas. And the stories continue to be widely ignored, so far.
It has been some time since we’ve heard news of a happy ending, and we watch with distress as a recent case of abuse involving Rrustem Neza jolts down a darkening tunnel of climate controlled indifference. Not only are USA authorities trying to deport him, too; they are petitioning to dope him first.
In all the cases we have shared at the Texas Civil Rights Review, the pattern is the same. Hard working, decent people crammed into a wringer without remorse. These exercises of American power cannot fail to provoke anger in a beating heart, and we have proved that hearts of Texas are beating.
Yet, at some level of structural maladjustment a sinister formula requires that news of someone’s stated fears should overtop interest in the real suffering of the day. As another chance at a happy ending slips past.
Against the discouragements of our continuing alliance with refugees and deportees, we quote John Rawls from “A Theory of Justice”:
“Now one feature of a rational plan is that in carrying it out the individual does not change his mind and wish that he had done something else instead. A rational person does not come to feel an aversion for the foreseen consequences so great that he regrets following the plan he has adopted. . . . We may, of course, regret something else, for example, that we have to live under such unfortunate circumstances . . .” (421-422) –gm
On December 13, 2007, Ramsey turns 65. In celebration of his birthday I thank God for the blessing that He has given me through his life. This is ironic considering the fact the he has been incarcerated for many years. The essence of a person, however, not in where he is, but rather who he is. Ramsey is a unique spirit chosen by God to sacrifice for the sake of humanity. I believe this.
With pride I share that Ramsey Muniz was a leader during the Civil Rights Movement in the late 60s and early 70s. Because of his leadership and activism Ramsey brought about a change which improved the quality of life for many by giving them a voice in the political arena.
With deepest gratitude I thank our families, friends, and supporters for their love and compassion, and for the action that they have taken to provide assistance to a man who sacrificed greatly for others, suffered unjustly, and continues to suffer today.
With love and gratitude,
“The power of love has no limits. It is the power of imagination.”
MALDEF WILL PRESENT ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE FIFTH CIRCUIT TO PROTECT HISTORIC TEXAS DESEGREGATION PROVISIONS
AUSTIN, TX – The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), the nation’s leading Latino legal organization, will argue on behalf of LULAC and the GI Forum to uphold student transfer provisions for Texas school districts in order to ensure that desegregation efforts are not impeded. Multicultural Education, Training and Advocacy, Inc. (META) serves as co-counsel in the United States v. Texas case, which will be argued before the Fifth Circuit by David Hinojosa, Staff Attorney for MALDEF’s Southwestern Region, on December 5, 2007.
Filed in 2004 by the Harrold and Samnorwood Independent School District’s (ISD), the ISD’s claimed that the State had unlawfully withheld their funds after they failed to enter student transfers into the state’s student transfer computer system. The Districts also argued that the transfer provisions of Order 5281 only applied to those school districts that were part of the original 1970 lawsuit and that ISD’s did not need to report Hispanic transfers.
Despite having prevailed in the district court, the districts argued that the transfer provisions should not remain intact and the State has essentially consented. MALDEF filed a brief with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and will argue: 1) that the matter is moot since the Districts prevailed in the trial court; and 2) that the transfer provisions remain relevant and are aimed at TEA’s past violations. If TEA desires to have those modified or dismissed, then it must properly bring a motion before the District Court, not the Court of Appeals.