Author: mopress

  • Stonegarden and Barriers at the Border

    By Rep. Ciro D. Rodriguez (D-TX)
    Congressional Record
    June 12, 2007 (H6283-H6284)

    My first and most important objective that I would like to address is regarding homeland security grants that would hopefully help the border cities and the law enforcement personnel that are on the border such as the police and the sheriff, the first responders, for stemming the tide of drug and human trafficking along our border. Chairman Price was instrumental in working with me and helping us to obtain $15 million for funding for Operation Stonegarden, a program that this administration failed to seek funding for and which had previously been funded in 2006.

    Operation Stonegarden began as a successful pilot program in 2005 and helped 14 border States on these issues. The initiative gave the States the flexibility that the Department grants provided to enhance coordination among not only the States but local community and Federal law enforcement agencies that are drastically needed. This pilot program resulted in an estimated 214 State, local, and tribal agencies working 36,755 man-days on various public safety as well as border security operations on the border.

    The budgetary constraints imposed on the committee precluded more funding in this area, but the bill language sends a clear message that programs such as Stonegarden are viable and will serve as a funding aid to the law enforcement communities along the border.

    Stonegarden did not receive funding last year. The funding assists local authorities with operational costs and equipment purchases that contribute to border security. The funds are intended to be used for operations involving both narcotics and human trafficking.

    The second objective regarding the fencing and the barriers that are necessary, I want to thank the chairman also for working with us in making sure we provide these types of barriers in an appropriate manner.

    I believe that the bill reported by the full committee and under consideration by the full House represents the most viable approach that can be utilized. I want to thank the chairman for allowing us to be able to present this bill. And as you well know, Mr. Chairman, this is a bill that is critical, an area that we have been lacking in this country where the administration has failed to provide the appropriate resources on the border. So I want to thank the chairman for allowing us to do that.

  • DHS Carry-Over Funding Goes Classified?

    By Rep. Dave Reichert (R-WA)
    Congressional Record
    June 12, 2007 (H6282)

    Part of this budget is classified, and we can say one thing, though, in open session, and that is that . . . According to the Department of Homeland Security, as of June 7 of this year, OPS has obligated 63 percent of fiscal year 2007’s funding and 99.9 percent of fiscal year 2006 carry-over funding.

  • LareDOS Newspaper Removed from Airport and City Hall

    Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it.” — Thomas Jefferson to John Jay, 1786.

    The First Amendment – Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    By MARIA EUGENIA GUERRA
    Publisher, LareDOS Newspaper

    Special to the Texas Civil Rights Review

    I am stung by the oddity that the Mayor of the City of Laredo chose to deal with our disparate points of view – his and mine — by ordering my newspaper removed from the City of Laredo Convention and Visitors Bureau puesto at Laredo International Airport, a spot at which I have left LareDOS every month for many, many years so that travelers and visitors to the airport can read up on the events of our community.

    There are so many aspects to his actions to consider. There’s the irony that he was on his way to Anaheim to take part in Laredo’s nomination as an All American City when he instructed the CVB employee to remove the papers and committed so egregious an un-American act as censorship of the press. There is the issue of his actions in violation of the City Charter which expressly forbids him as an elected official to instruct any City employee to perform any task. As it turns out he had also earlier instructed a City of Laredo employee at City Hall to do the same, something confirmed to radio host Jay St. John who asked the Mayor if he had really had the paper removed from the CVB desk at the airport, to which the Mayor answered, “Yeah, and the ones at City Hall, too.”

    There is the oddity that this elected public official, a former federal employee, an FBI agent, would have so little regard for the First Amendment (ratified in 1791) and my right to have an opinion, to be able to express it, and to be able to print and distribute a newspaper.

    There is the oddity that he called me the day before he had my papers removed, and we discussed not the removal of my papers from City edifices, but his dog Princess. He is bothered that she made two cameo appearances on the cover of LareDOS in recent months and he considers this an attack on his family. It’s important, to me, to note that for all the years I have lived in this, the city of my birth, we have never had a “First Dog” or a “First Lady.” The currency of those odd coins were minted not by us but by the Mayor, and as such carry on their meaning a vain self-importance that has become repugnant to many.

    There is the oddity that he would think for a nano second that ordering my papers removed from a public building paid for by my tax dollars and federal funds would for a second silence me in any measure.

    My small staff of earnest writers and I have had so many thoughts about this affront to the Constitution, this affront to us. We work hard as a team to produce one of the best-written and most respected news journals from here to Austin. I say this with not a brag in my voice; others in the brethren of the noble trade of advocacy journalism – which seeks to inform, to give voice to issues and new ideas, to foment debate – have said it of us.

    In the last few days we, as journalists, have all had an opinion about the Mayor’s trample on the First Amendment and specifically on our individual freedoms of expression. As we’ve conjured dictatorships that have quashed the free press – Papa Doc, Idi Amin, Sadaam Hussein, Hugo Chavez, to name just a few — we’ve no choice but to add Raul Salinas to that dishonorable company of paper thin-shelled tyrants.

    One member of my staff made a very fine point of the malice in the mayor’s actions – that of having so little disregard for the relationship of our paper with our advertisers. The Mayor meant to harm us, that is clear.

    It is incredible that the avowed leader of this city, a man who participates in huge decisions for a city and a country he professes so often to love, would lose sight of what makes this country great. All those God Bless America platitudes, all those unfocused soap box tirades about terrorism with which he consumes valuable City Council meeting time seem more than ever like hollow sentiments you use to fill up the air space when you are not really a leader, not really a visionary, not really respectful of the rights of others.

    To what can we attribute his disdain for the First Amendment? Low blood sugar? Flight anxiety? The strains of the job? The excitement of a junket at which his city might be named All American? I can’t come up with an explanation that eclipses the importance of the role of the freedom of the press in the expectation that government and elected officials perform in the best interest of those they serve.

    What was that trite campaign slogan of the Mayor’s – right man, right time? Mayor, wrong woman, wrong newspaper.

    LareDOS on the web

  • Feds Drop Threat to Transfer Ramsey Muniz

    Dear Friends:

    On May 18, 2007, the Warden and Associate Warden of the Three Rivers Federal Correctional Institution, informed Ramiro Muniz that he would not be moved from Three Rivers FCI for a while, unless a medical situation necessitated the transfer. This news has brought us great
    joy and a cautious sense of optimism.

    We owe this new development to your assistance, and we extend our gratitude for the invaluable support that you have provided.

    Thank you for being with us throughout this difficult time. We ask for your prayers as we move forward with plans to prove Ramsey’s innocence.

    We will keep you abreast of this volatile situation as we continue to seek freedom for Ramiro “Ramsey” R. Muniz.

    Sincerely,
    Irma Muniz

    www.freeramsey.com