Author: mopress

  • Ramsey Muniz: An Unreasonable Mexicano

    Dear Friends: Enclosed is the first of several letters written by Ramsey Muniz while in solitary confinement at the Oklahoma Transfer Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Conditions there were torturous, as described by Ramsey. Please distribute.–Irma L. Muniz
    ****************************************

    5/11/06

    Writings from Solitary Confinement

    The writings come from the depth of my Mexicano spiritual corazon. Even though I find myself in this cold dark hole of America, the spirit to rise and share with my people that the time has come for us to seize. I see no faces. I only encounter the concrete walls and steel beds of oppression and injustice. Yet I’m not saddened because my mind and Mexicano corazon are filled with the spirituality of our liberation here in America once and for all.

    I’m filled with the spirits of our sisters and brothers from our Holy Land (Mexico) who took to the streets in millions like never before. The entire world viewed with amazement that maybe the United States was not a country of the free. Why should I have to be constantly confined in the dark cold holes of this system? The faces I saw on the national TV news were the majority of young faces, which means the struggle for justice and freedom can take as long as it has to. Those same faces in the streets will be there for a long time to come.

    When one struggles for justice, liberation and spirituality, you never truly become old. One becomes
    younger at heart and mind, simply because you are seeking the truth and the truth this very day is setting our people, la raza, los Mexicanos/Mexicanas free.

    And why has the Bureau of Prisons denied me medical care and treatment for the last eleven years? Why? For the first time, we Mexicanos have become a national presidential issue in the United States. Hispanics, Latinos, and national Hispanic organizations
    should take a strong position in favor of amnesty for
    our sisters and brothers of our Holy Land. Please do
    not allow these politicians or the congress to think
    that we are different. Our roots, our most powerful
    ancient God-given roots all go back to the same source.

    We were not in existence only yesterday. We were
    here long before the creation of the United States.
    We are not strangers to this land. We must learn to
    be patient with each other. We have been physically,
    mentally, and spiritually divided for almost 500
    years. There is a lot of self-hatred and ignorance
    in our hearts and we must overcome the latter in
    order to win. At this point, we as a people are the
    only ones that can be destructive to each other.
    Families must bond once again. Blood and heart are
    the strongest elements in mankind. We must set aside
    all the petty differences and not become a soap
    opera destructive force. La familia must rise once
    again. La familia must reunite. La familia must
    embrace again!

    I decided to express my constitutional right,
    and petitioned the court to direct the federal medical
    facility to provide medical care and treatment.
    Instead, the staff in Springfield, Missouri took my
    body in chains and shackles and tonight I find myself
    in solitary confinement in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

    They stated that on one, especially a Mexican like
    myself, would file any petition against them. Is
    this the true meaning of American justice?

    Even tonight with the token lighting, as I share these
    words from my heart, I can feel the spirits of our
    Mexicano revolutionary hero, Ricardo Flores Magon,
    who also suffered in the dungeons of Leavenworth and who died there – or is he really dead? I live within
    all the spirits and love of our past revolutionary
    Mexicanos and Mexicanas. They never permit for me
    to feel alone, lonely, or isolated from those close
    to my life. I only become stronger in my beliefs,
    convictions, and principles because the Oppressor
    continues to violate my human rights by any means
    necessary. I only feel for my wife, my family, and
    those close to my heart after so many years of
    suffering and sacrifice.

    The nights are extremely cold and painful to
    my body, yet they refuse to give me a blanket. I
    will survive because it is written in our ancient
    past that we must sacrifice to the end. Why is it
    so cold and dark in this hole, and why must I suffer
    in this cruel fashion?

    We must learn to openly communicate with our
    Holy Land of Mexico and its governing body. For too
    long the Holy Land has separated itself from its own
    people who lived in Aztlan (Southwest). A national
    delegation of Mexicanos and Mexicanas should be
    organized for the purpose of presenting its agenda
    to the president and Congreso de Mexico. Remember
    and don’t ever forget that we are all the same people.
    Todos somos uno! The day that we as a people accept
    each other as one is that day that we shall be free
    in this world of today and tomorrow.

    Forgiveness: We as a people, as a Mexican race
    are in the immediate process of recognizing and
    accepting who we are once again. For decades the
    oppressor has made us believe we are different,
    simply because a border divided us for many
    years. We must learn to forgive each other for
    the blindness and/or acceptance of thinking we
    were different. We are one and shall be one
    forever! Nothing can change that. It is part of
    our nature and most importantly it is God-given.
    “Todos Somos Uno” will be our new cry to the
    world and to those around us. We are in for new
    ideas, philosophies, thoughts, action, and
    organizing and we must come with an open heart
    and love for our people.

    “The reasonable man adapts himself to the
    world: The unreasonable one persists in trying
    to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
    progress depends on the unreasonable man.”

    –George Bernard Shaw

    One could say that I’m an unreasonable
    Mexicano. Be it so, especially since I have
    witnessed and experienced oppression, discrimination,
    and injustices. If some doubt my words, then tell
    me why I am confined in this cold dark hole and
    will be in this hole until who knows when. My
    sisters and brothers from our Holy Land of Mexico
    have also suffered for coming into the land which
    was once ours. Some are even confined in the holes…

    I will never surrender the love and devotion
    I have in my heart for the freedom of our people.
    We must forever sacrifice and endure the
    suffering it takes for liberation and justice
    within mankind. History throughout the world
    states that some will have to sacrifice and carry
    the cross of freedom, love, and spirituality. I
    have accepted that part of history from the t
    ime of my birth. My mother, Hilda, was a Mexicana
    freedom fighter to the day of her death. I continue
    to carry that cross in my heart and body, for she
    is with me this very night sharing these words with
    all our people!

    In exile,
    Ramsey (Tez)
    Libertad y Aztlan!!
    *************************************

    http://www.freeramsey.com

  • How Juárez Came to be Mistaken for a Leftist

    Mexican History: Readings From The Left

    By Rodrigo Saldaña Guerrero
    Guest Columnist from Mexico

    Benito Juárez García was born in 1806. He became president in the midst of a civil war. What were his politics?

    This champion of Mexican nationalism was in favor of U. S. intervention in Mexico. He confiscated Catholic Church estates that sustained many welfare activities, and sold them cheaply (he did not use them to strengthen the state, as his myth maintains). He terminated Indian communal property.

    These interventions in Church and Indian affairs fostered the formation of the latifundies that made infamous the Porfirio Díaz regime and against which Emiliano Zapata fought in the next century.

    He was a capitalist who believed that progress laid in making every Mexican a liberal Western person. He clung to power until his death, violating the law and using electoral fraud.

    In other words, his politics were precisely the same of the much criticized Díaz. Díaz started a revolution with a No Reelection slogan, became president for four years, left the presidency in charge of a friend, and later reelected himself over and over until a revolution toppled him.

    The revolution aborted and gave way to a civil war. The winner of this was Alvaro Obregón. He became president for four years, left the presidency in charge of a friend, then started reelecting himself. Then he was assassinated. In many ways, his career paralleled that of dictator Díaz. But he elected to build his power on a progressive rhetoric that, without being precisely socialistic, repudiated the laissez faire capitalism Juárez had sponsored.

    Here the complications begin, because Obregón did not repudiate Juárez himself. Juárez became one of the civic saints of the patriotic myths on which Obregón and his successors built their regime. The capitalistic Juárez was presented as a leftist.

    The system Obregón founded, perfected by Plutarco Elías Calles and, above all, by Lázaro Cárdenas Del Río, built on a large measure on the oppression of poor people, and which kept the people poor, was publicized as a center left party.

    A political landscape was painted in which this system (which in time was known as PRI) was the only sensible choice between communist left and rightist PAN (this party was not rightist at the time, by the way, but official propaganda helped making it so).

    The PRI system was deeply corrupt, and many of his people got richer at the expense of the poor, who suffered fierce repression whenever they tried to resist. It tried to cover up this situation with subsidies, debt and inflation, that future generations would have to pay for. Many intellectuals were generously paid for their part in this make up work, a part that included writing Mexican history in such a way that it would conform to the official rhetoric.

    All this made a mess of the historical consciousness of the Mexican people. Juárez capitalism and PRI-ist corruption and oppression were successfully presented as left.

    All this is only part of the story, of course. We have, for instance, the fascinating joining of men who were mortal enemies in one pantheon of heroes. But the point I want to emphasize is the mess the PRI version of Mexican history, mainly of the Juárez period and of the nature of the system itself, has caused in the ideological debates of the present. The insistence of many intellectuals in the validity of that version is like a virus that makes it very difficult to examine objectively a series of issues.

    The enormous complexity of history is too often simplified for party purposes, sometimes causing a very serious distortion. The cure for this cultural illness is cultural health: making people aware of the true nature of historiography, and of the true history of the society they are interested in.

    Mexican historiography has developed enormously in the last half century or so. For some strange reason, political debate has remained far behind it in its understanding of Mexican history. Intellectuals that should know better keep using old myths in their approach to present day issues.

    The natural solution for this problem would be to dialogue about the history that lies at the bottom of that approach. There is, however, a vicious circle: the present day approach contaminates the understanding of history and prevents an objective look at it. I suggest showing these two trends in their interrelationship and inviting comments on this point.

  • AT&T Sued for Invasion of Privacy

    FIVE AUSTIN PLAINTIFFS FILE FEDERAL CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST AT&T FOR DISCLOSING TELEPHONE NUMBERS TO NATIONAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

    Five Austin plaintiffs today [May 18] filed a federal class action suit in U.S. District Court in Austin against AT&T because it has, and is currently providing the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States Government with phone call records of millions of Americans, including Plaintiffs, in violation of federal and Texas state laws, including the federal Stored Wire and Electronic Communication and Transactional Records Access Act, the federal Telecommunications Act, the Texas Penal Code, the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and Texas common law.

    Pursuant to its agreement with NSA, AT&T provided, and continues to provide, the NSA with a complete listing of customers calling history, including the phone numbers of customers, the phone numbers customers dial, the location from which each call originates, the length of each call, and the location where each call terminates. In exchange for this information, AT&T received, and continues to receive, direct and/or indirect financial compensation from NSA.

    The Plaintiffs filed suit on behalf of a class of attorneys, a class of journalists, and a class of financial advisors.

    The five plaintiffs are:

    1. James C. Harrington, attorney and Director of the Texas Civil Rights, frequently sues the federal government and criticizes its conduct with regard to civil liberties. He and the Texas Civil Rights Project have had an account for telecommunications services with AT&T (or predecessor companies) during the last three years, and continue to have this account. Harringtons mobile phone service is through AT&T. As an attorney, Harrington uses his mobile phone and other AT&T telecommunications equipment and services to communicate with clients and co-counsel.

    2. Richard A. Grigg, an Austin attorney licensed in the State of Texas, who represents an individual detained in Guantanamo and though he may not communicate with his client over the phone, he uses his AT&T telecommunications equipment and services to communicate with other habeas attorneys concerning his client and his clients case. As an attorney, Grigg uses his mobile phone and other AT&T telecommunications equipment and services to communicate with clients and co-counsel.

    3. Louis Black, a freelance reporter and editor of the Austin Chronicle. He has had an account for telecommunications services with AT&T (or predecessor companies) during the last three years, and continues to have this account. He uses his AT&T telecommunications equipment and services to communicate with news sources and informants, some of whom wish to remain confidential.

    4. The Austin Chronicle is a publication whose primary place of business and distributorship is Austin. The Austin Chronicle has had an account for telecommunications services with AT&T (or predecessor companies) during the last three years, and continues to have this account. The Austin Chronicle contributors and staff use the AT&T equipment and services to communicate with news sources and informants, some of whom wish to remain confidential.

    5. Michael Kentor is a financial advisor and founder of the Kentor Company, a financial firm. He has had an account for telecommunications services with AT&T (or predecessor companies) during the last three years, and continues to have this account. He uses his AT&T telecommunications equipment and services to communicate with clients, family, friends, and colleagues.

    Through their federal case, Plaintiffs seek preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, restraining AT&T from disclosing Plaintiffs call records and those of the classes to the NSA. They also seek statutory damages to each Plaintiff as provided in federal and state statutes, in an amount no less than the sum of $1000 per each act of disclosure of call record information, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2707(c); and $100 per day per violation, pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, art. 18.20, § 16(a). They also seek punitive damages against AT&T.

    Plaintiffs are represented by prominent constitutional attorney, R. James George, Jr. of George & Brothers, L.L.P., in Austin.

    Media Advisory posted at Texas Civil Rights Project, May 18, 2006

  • Equality Texas Opposes Federal Marriage Amendment

    (May 18, 2006) This morning, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted along partisan lines to send the Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) to the full Senate for consideration. The proposed constitutional amendment restricts marriage to a [partnership] between a man and a woman. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has committed to bring the FMA up for a full Senate vote in early June.

    In the first 24 hours of our advocacy campaign, [Texas] Senators Hutchison and Cornyn each received 700 letters from their constituents letting them know they do NOT support writing discrimination into the United States Constitution.

    To join the campaign for partnership rights, go to:

    Equality Texas