Author: mopress

  • Mexicano Constitutional Human Rights

    And the Rights of Any Human Being

    Citlalmina y nuestra gente Mexicana: "I covered my face
    with my hands and sat still, in pure unconsciousness, neither hearing
    nor feeling nor knowing, in the darkness of the dungeons of America,
    like the deep of the sea. With no time and no world, in the deeps that
    are timeless and worldless.
    It was then that our spirituality of our ancient Mexicano ancestors
    reached into the depth of my heart."– Tezcatlipoca (R. Muñiz)

    By Ramsey Muniz

    The entire United States of America has finally come to understand
    and realize that our people, nuestros Mexicanos / Mexicanas, have
    fulfilled our ancient destiny of returning to our land. It is written
    in our ancient Mexican history that one day we as a people would return
    to our land, which by law of God and nature was ours from the time of
    its creation. At this point I’m not here to question or to share the
    truth of whose land (Aztlan) is, or to prove the ownership. The latter
    is and has been a question or matter of ownership from the beginning,
    and by the preponderance of the evidence, we are rightful heirs.

    At this point we are deeply concerned about the drastic laws and
    American legislature which corrals our people like livestock.
    Hispanics, Latinos, Chicanos, whatever nuestra raza decides to call
    itself, it is our duty and obligation as Mexicanos to protect the human
    rights of our people regarding the devastating and panicking
    legislation against us throughout the United States.

    Those of us Mexicanos who were born here in the United States must
    provide the necessary assistance as if we were aiding our sisters and
    brothers. We are not different; we are all the same. Nosotros somos
    uno. Our sisters and brothers from our Holy Land of Mexico are not
    criminals. In seeking a better life for our families our sisters and
    brothers crossed into Aztlan
    (Southwest) not only for job opportunities or careers, but fulfilling
    the consciousness of reuniting once again in Aztlan.

    The oppressed, regardless of race, have forever risen from their
    oppression and have embraced liberation. After so many years, we, Los
    Mexicanos del Sexto Sol, have become advocates of liberation, justice,
    and eventually the ultimate
    return of Aztlan. Regardless of how many laws and/or legislation are
    passed to oppress our people, we shall overcome that oppression with
    our ancient history and writings in our hands.

    As a raza, as a people we cannot continue to permit the oppressor
    (United States immigration laws) to violate the
    God-given human rights of the masses of our people.
    Mexicano organizations, Latin Americans, and others must come forward
    and be advocates for our sisters and brothers who carry in their
    possessions all their worldly property in one small paper sack. We must
    protect the human rights of nuestra raza regardless of how they crossed
    the river.

    "We will collectively realize that there is more to us
    as a people than the conquest. That we are not savages, and it is very
    important to gaze back at our history, however much it hurts, and go
    beyond that, and look at our magnificent Mexicano indigenous past. As
    we decolonize our minds, we will realize that we are heirs to a
    magnificent culture as well as
    architects of our own future."–Oscar Benavides (Carrizo Springs, Texas)

    The youth of today and tomorrow must now fully
    understand our ancient Mexicano history and how within the last 500
    years we have finally come into the passage of our cosmic future in all
    America. We must protest against the structure of any wall or fence
    (Mexicano Berlin wall) to be structured at the border.

    Even if America decides to take such devastating inhumane action,
    within a certain period of time we, Los Mexicanos, will be able to
    overcome such actions. Scholars and those who have studied our history
    as a profession, will share that history will provide the necessary
    intellectual elements of arriving to the
    conclusion that to begin with the entire Southwest of America (Aztlan)
    was ours as a land at one time, and it was prophesized during times of
    hardship and turmoil that we would rise once again.

    A race who has no conception or knowledge of its ancient history or
    past will be in a stage of non-existence. We are the 21st century proud
    race, reclaiming that which was ours from the beginning.

    "As I embrace our ancient Mexicano sacred indigenous
    spirituality into the present, I’m transformed by a passion I have only
    heard in our past; now I feel it in my own Mexicano soul. I have been
    given access to a great and profound secret. Now I know the suffering,
    sadness, sorrow and sacrifices of my Mexicano ancestors, and it has
    become my own."– Tezcatlipoca (R. Muñiz)

    National, state, and local Hispanic /Latino civil rights
    organizations must come forward and protect the rights of our people.
    We cannot continue to deny ourselves. We are all the same. We are one,
    and the sooner we are able to accept that, then we will be able to
    liberate all our people. It is a national/international political
    disgrace to view on television the American minutemen organizations are
    now patrolling the borders of America.

    Hispanic/Latino leaders cannot avoid this racist issue of having
    American citizens, without duly authorized jurisdiction, hunting down
    our people like animals. Latino and Hispanic leaders cannot continue to
    turn their faces as if our people were
    in the wrong to begin with. We as Mexicanos cannot permit for American
    minutemen or any other vigilante group to hunt our people in the
    wilderness. Latino/Hispanic organizations should
    also protest to our Holy Land of Mexico in order that they respond to
    the illegal actions of policing forces at the borders. It is late into
    the night, but for the last couple of days my heart has
    searched for words to share with my people.

    In conclusion, I urge all newcomers and those who seek to relocate
    in the Southwest to move to the state of Arizona. It is a strong
    Republican, ultra conservative community. We must move into that state
    before they structure walls all around us. Arizona should be our future!

    There is no question in my mind that all our destinies as a race
    will be fulfilled. The future shall be ours and we must prepare for it
    not only intellectually, but most importantly
    spiritually. We must not be impatient with ourselves during times of
    conflict and differences. The time has come for us to step forward as a
    proud race and let the world know that finally we will be a free raza
    in this universe.

    In exile,
    Tezcatlipoca (R. Muñiz)

    "We want only to show you something we have seen and
    tell you something we have heard….that here and there in the world and
    now and then in ourselves is a new spiritual Mexicano."–Tezcatlipoca

    Note: Received via emai from Irma L. Muniz on May 25, 2005. Ramsey’s message is dated May 2.–gm

  • City of Austin Receives Landmark Report on African Americans

    Group Solutions RJW presented its recommendations resulting from meetings concerning African American quality of life in Austin to the Austin City Council during its Thursday, May 26, 2005 meeting.

    The report will serve as a framework for an action plan to address quality of life issues that were raised during the meetings and in the City’s “African American Community Scorecard,” which identified disparities between African Americans when compared to other ethnic groups.

    Six forums were conducted in April as a follow-up to that scorecard report. More than 700 individuals attended the public forums. Group Solutions’ recommendation also are based on hundreds of written comments received from the public last month.

    Link to City of Austin website.

  • Are Civil Rights Groups Racist?

    Listening to Alex Jones, May 27

    By Greg Moses

    By happenstance Friday I tuned into Alex Jones via live internet stream as he took a call from a Hispanic woman who expressed tearful confusion over opinions that were being broadcast about MEChA and LULAC.

    In response, Jones seemed to treat these Hispanic civil rights organizations as the moral equivalent of white supremacist groups such as the Klan.

    When Jones asked the caller to talk about her own experience, she said that she has experienced enough discrimination to the point that she cannot trust any white person — “but I don’t want to see you killed.”

    At this point Jones called attention to the alleged racism of the comment and spoke of his own experience facing anti-white sentiments during his youthful years in Dallas. On this topic, he promises more programs in the future.

    Jones is an interesting and important player in the InfoWars of our times. He has an encyclopedic mind and a visceral instinct for liberty. I classify him as a libertarian. On the basis of today’s program, I subscribed to the radio program at a cost of about $10 per month. In the notes that follow I intend no disrespect to the man.

    But I do take issue with his portrayal of Hispanic civil rights groups as the moral equivalent of white supremacists. On this issue, everything follows from where one begins.

    Analysis at the Texas Civil Rights Review proceeds from a general assessment that white supremacy continues to have powerful effects in the history that we share. This is a structural assessment that when all the facts are added up, demographic trends for hundreds of years have trended in the direction of white power.

    The thesis does not deny that (1) within the structures of white power, there are also class wars or that (2) bigotry against white folks is not real.

    However, when a Hispanic caller speaks about patterns of discrimination that she has faced, and when Jones replies with his own experience of being called a honky or being mugged by a Black man, we have already a mismatch in the kinds of claims that are being made.

    On the one hand, the two testimonials seem to be logically equivalent. The caller has experienced bigotry, and so has Jones. Therefore, bigotry may fall upon anyone’s head.

    But the universal experience of bigotry does not address a quite different question: does one perceive in the patterns of bigotry a structure of racialized power such that trends of bigotry tend to fall in a direction that favors white power?

    On the broader structural question, no one’s single experience – neither the experience of a single Hispanic caller nor the experience of a single Alex Jones – can be decisive. To make a structural assessment, one must cast a wide net around a multitude of facts and experiences.

    For example, when the Hispanic caller says that she has been made to feel ashamed of her Spanish language, is she pointing to a pattern that is “representative” of “collective” relations between English and Spanish speaking citizens of Texas?

    On this point, Jones began to affirm the validity of the caller’s complaint when he observes briefly that when it comes to Spanish speaking citizens of Texas, powers of the state do not want to invest much money in teaching excellent skills in English. In this comment, Jones helpfully acknowledges that a structure of power may be discerned in the Texas system of education. Attention to this structure of power is what remains decisive.

    In the end, I wonder if the Texas Civil Rights Review will be able to find a common logical ground to discuss the problem of civil rights within a libertarian framework.

    For libertarians, reality is overwhelmingly an individualized affair. According to this logical framework, it is difficult to find any categorical status for collective patterns of experience. Therefore, we will find very little ground to recognize the qualities of life that make race and racism most significant.

    On the other hand, social democrats bring to the table a significantly different framework of analysis. For social democrats, collective analysis confers categorical status to social groups and classes.

    In the conversation between libertarians and social democrats, there is little to be learned in tit for tat debates on issues like racism. The libertarian will continue to privilege the conclusions that follow from an individualistic framework, and the social democrat will follow a quite different path of analysis.

    The debates over affirmative action, for example, are overwhelmingly disputes between logical starting points. Yet the debates are so fruitless because neither side stops to discuss the difference in framework.

    From a social democrat point of view, when I’m listening to a libertarian, I ask myself, what is this person teaching me about the things that can be learned from reality if we take it from a fundamentally individualized point of view? In my own emphasis on the social structures of realty, how does the libertarian help me see what I may be missing?

    We see in the testimony of Alex Jones that there is a pain to the experience of bigotry that is not completely numbed out by structures of white power. He remembers being called a honky and he remembers quite clearly that the man who attempted to mug him was Black. He also seems to take some delight in reporting that the attempt was turned back.

    But also as a social democrat I would like the libertarian to consider the ways that individualized logic fails to learn important facts about individuals.

    Especially among white individuals, there seems to be an assumption that group structures among people of color are simply mirror images of group structures under white power. Therefore, if people of color get together to fight white power, they must be coming from a place no different than white supremacy itself.

    This is how civil rights advocacy falls under the charge of hate speech when civil rights advocates speak plainly about the problem of white supremacy. But if I am fighting white supremacy, to what extent am I attacking white people as such? In fighting white racism, how am I diminishing the humanity of white folks per se?

    On the other hand, if I am advocating white supremacy, the enunciation itself is an attack on the humanity of people of color.

    MeChA and LULAC are struggling toward parity. The Klan is struggling toward disparity. The moral difference between these collective projects is decisive. It is the difference between civil rights and anti-civil rights.

    Now let’s carefully re-introduce Alex Jones pleasure in reporting that he turned back an attempted assault by a Black man. The pride and pleasure are expressed in his tone of voice. When you face an aggressor, there is pleasure in self-defense.
    There is some bravado. If we listened to someone bragging about BEING an aggressor, it would be much more difficult to share in the pleasure. With Alex Jones, we can share a little in the pride and pleasure of self-defense.

    Likewise, among struggling groups of color, one sometimes discerns a pride and pleasure of self-defense bravado. Malcolm X was a master of the art. Jose Angel Gutierrez is a great Texas example. Ramsey Muniz also expresses a kind of pride and pleasure envisioning a day when the conquest will have been turned back.

    From a libertarian, individualistic framework, the pleasure and bravado of self-defense struggle can be mistaken for aggressive initiative. Perhaps it would be better if self-defenders did not fall for the pleasure of counter-assault, but when they do, who can blame them? It is after all an assault that has been turned back. And this is the raw material of every action movie that spreads the thrill of counter-assault to ticket buying audiences across the globe.

    Should Alex Jones apologize for his pride and bravado at turning ba

    ck an assault? When he mentions that the assailant was Black is he confessing to a racist motivation for his pleasure? On both counts, I answer no. Pride and bravado in self-defense is humanly understandable. Identifying the race of the assailant need not be an expression of bigotry. In the case of Alex Jones, I believe that he is not a bigot.

    But if we take the moral qualities of self-defense bravado and apply them to collective struggles in a world of collective injustice, then we have the key for helping Alex Jones understand the difference between MEChA and LULAC on the one hand and the Klan on the other. One side is in a struggle of self defense. The other side is addicted to a tradition of supremacist aggression.

  • Reading IndyMedia on the Klan and Police

    Baku writes at Austin IndyMedia: “Just in the past week we have seen resistance to a KKK meeting in Tomball, Texas. Austinites have been threatened by self-identifying Nazis. Last week, bricks were thrown at the windows of KPFT during a Latino literary radio program. And a few days ago, an unarmed Chicano youth was shot and killed by the Austin Police Department.”

    * * *

    Activists Take on Klan at Tomball

    Houston IndyMedia

    Protests of June 11 draw on diverse traditions: faith and reconciliation, Anti-Racist Action, and the New Black Panther Party.

    * * *

    Police Take on Activists at Tomball

    Houston IndyMedia

    how would u like to have your backpack held against your face and you cant move at all with a gun pointed at your knee ready to take you down if you do move?

    * * *

    Activists Take on Police in Austin

    Austin IndyMedia

    One witness on Austin IndyMedia video says the 18-year-old victim had dropped his belly to the street just prior to being shot in the back and killed. Protests continue Monday 5pm outside Austin Police Headquarters.

    * * *

    Activists Call on Police in Austin

    Austin IndyMedia

    The police confiscated the chains and arrested one of the Nazi’s for outstanding warrants. The other two were allowed to walk.

    * * *

    Activists Discourage Calling On Police

    Austin IndyMedia

    Maybe try acting as if the cops didn’t even exist.