Author: mopress

  • Women's History Month 2004

    Sold American:
    Cowboy Nation
    Gets Ready to Vote

    If tragedy is

    the name we use for a drama in which the
    protagonist falls on his own character, then tragic

    is
    the shape of public opinion in America.

    Headlines Monday claimed that three-

    fourths of
    Americans already have their minds made up about
    presidential candidates, but the poll

    suggests more
    than that. On the issue of who we are, the poll
    reveals that Americans have had

    their minds made up
    for many, many years. Taking up the question of sincerity, for instance,

    a
    majority of Americans tell pollsters that Bush says
    what he believes (51 percent), but an even

    greater
    majority report that Bush exaggerated to build support
    for war on Iraq (59 percent). So

    what are Americans
    saying about Bush? That he believes his

    own
    exaggerations.

    Again, on the sincerity question, a majority (57
    percent)

    believe that Kerry does not say what he
    thinks, yet American voters rate Kerry higher than
    Bush

    for caring about us, for being able to deal with
    economic decisions, make sure social security

    is
    solvent, and increase jobs. What do Americans think
    about Kerry? That he does not believe in

    his own
    capabilities.

    On the fundamental question of sincerity,

    therefore,
    Americans have nothing new to say. As a nation, we
    prefer sincere liars to insecure

    competents. Look for
    a Reagan-Carter repeat. Or, for that matter,
    Reagan-Dukakis, Clinton-Dole,

    Nixon-McGovern. When it
    comes to the question of sincerity, America loves a
    salesman best.

    And where do we find the qualities of a great
    salesman? Not in the product, but in

    the pitch.

    And what is Bush pitching these days? That we are a
    culture at war. More

    important than care, economy,
    social security, or jobs, is our ability to conserve
    our way of

    life against subversive forces. It’s an
    exaggeration, as we fully know. But it’s

    an
    exaggeration that creates purpose.

    Meanwhile, a mid-week editorial from the

    Boston Globe
    reminds us what Bush is selling to the rest of the
    world. Scan the headlines coming

    out of Santiago,
    Chile during Women’s History Month. Bush
    Administration Opposes 40 Latin

    American Nations.
    Countries of the Americas, Except US, Reaffirm
    Reproductive Health Accord. US

    Lone No at Chile
    Meeting .

    “The United States was the only country to

    disagree
    with a declaration linking poverty eradication to
    greater access to services for family

    planning, safe
    motherhood and HIV/AIDS prevention,” reports the
    United Nations.

    A

    simple Google search for “Bush opposes treaty”
    yields the following: Bush opposes ratifying

    nuclear
    test ban treaty; Bush Administration Opposes UN
    Children’s Treaty; Bush Tries to Weaken

    Tobacco
    Treaty; US Abandons Environment Treaty; Bush Opposes
    Kyoto Global Warming Treaty. That’s

    page one.

    Our embattled way of life is indeed at war with the
    world. Bush is right

    about that. But he is only our
    most recent cowboy-in-chief, pushing the frontiers,
    shredding the

    treaties, and sending in the cavalry to
    secure the outposts.

    So, of course, Americans

    feel more comfortable with
    Bush than Kerry when it comes to handling an
    international crisis and

    protecting the country from a
    terrorist attack.

    On three questions Bush tops the

    charts absolutely.
    Seventy five percent believe Bush has a vision for the
    country. Seventy

    eight percent believe that we would
    have a good economy today were it not for the
    disruption of

    the massacre of Sept. 11.

    And 75 percent of Americans believe Bush shares the
    moral

    values most Americans try to live by.

    So the poll numbers demonstrate that Kerry and

    Bush
    are placeholders in a cowboy nation that is nearly 80
    percent unified.

    So

    bring on your Nader, if you will. Or point out
    that America is isolating itself in the eyes

    of
    others. What we have here is a mature culture acting
    out its character in ways that are as

    predictable as
    they are tragic.

    If the poll numbers hold up, whoever wins in

    November
    will be the top cowboy candidate. In this drama of
    Cowboy Nation, is there an

    alternative ending at hand?

    Greg Moses
    Site

    Editor

  • Blogburst for Reproductive Rights

    (this post is part of the Stand Up For Choice BlogBurst)

    Stand Up For Choice: I 

stand with the March for Women's Lives!

    I support the March for Women’s Lives

    on April 25,

    2004 in Washington DC

  • Resegregation at A&M, 1994-2003

    CHART BELOW
    Enrollment Ratios 2000-2004
    for Texas A&M University
    by

    Race/Ethnicity & Gender
    See “Read More”

    First Time Student Ratios by

    Gender / Race / Ethnicity
    (Fall Semester)

    Category 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
    Total 6,685 6,760 6,949 6,726 7,068
    Female 3,497 (52.3%) 3,476 (51.4%) 3,665 (52.7%) 3,532 ( 52.5%) 3,643 ( 51.5%)
    Male 3,188 (47.7%)

    3,284 (48.6%) 3,284 (47.3%)

    3,194 ( 47.5%) 3,425 ( 48.5%)

    White 5,389 (80.6%

    )

    5,544 (82.0%) 5,758 (82.9%

    )

    5,538 (82.3%) 5,640 (79.8%

    )

    Black 173

    (2.6%)

    198 (2.9%) 182 (2.6%

    )

    158 (2.3%) 213 (3.0%)

    Hispanic 669 (10.0%

    )

    674 (10.0%) 664 (9.6%)

    692 (10.3%) 865 (12.2%)
    Asian/Pacifc Island 251 (3.8%

    )

    222 (3.3%) 230 (3.3%)

    234 (3.5%) 267 (3.8%)
    Am. Indian 35 (0.5%)

    37 (0.5%) 27 (0.4%) 27 (0.4%) 38 (0.5%)
    International 47 (0.7%) 48 (0.7%) 56 (0.8%) 67

    (1.0%)

    40 (0.6%)
    Other 121 (1.8%) 37

    (0.5%)

    32 (0.5%) 10 ( 0.1%

    )

    5 ( 0.1%)
    Source OISP/ep/F2000

    (p.76)

    OISP/ep/F2001

    (p.67)

    OISP/ep/F2002

    (p.80)

    OISP/ep/F2003

    (p.82)

    OISP/ep/F2004

    (p.95)

    Note: Between 1994 and 1998, the ratio of:

    –Black first time students fell steadily from 4.8% to 2.7%

    –Hispanic first-time students

    peaked at 14.7% then fell to 9.1%

    –White first-time students increased steadily from 76.3% to

    82.0%

    Source: OPIR/ip/Profile98(p.8)

    Okay maybe we’d like to see a second thing: systematic reporting of enrollment

    ratios; without ratios, the raw numbers have little civil rights significance.–gm
    [2004 numbers

    updated Dec.]

  • Faculty-Staff Group Asks Again for Leadership

    “The issue of admissions is fundamental to the university. Our

    differences with the president’s
    policy regarding admissions are well known. While we are pleased

    that the university has
    increased efforts in the areas of outreach and scholarships (including the

    diversity fellowship),
    the academic literature on minority enrollment is clear: affirmative action

    is necessary to combat
    existing bias in American society and create a diverse campus. Early evidence

    from next year’s
    class suggests that minority enrollments are up, and we are encouraged by this.

    However, this
    data is still preliminary. More importantly, the short-term effect of these efforts

    does not speak to
    the long-term ability of TAMU to maintain a diverse student body. We urge the

    president to
    reconsider his policy and allow race and ethnicity to be considered in university

    admissions.
    Because there is significant debate among those who support the consideration of race

    in
    admissions as to how such criteria are to be applied, we would also encourage TAMU to

    review
    the admissions policies of the Vision 2020 institutions.”

    [May 18 (2004)

    Recommendations from Texas A&M Univ. Faculty and Staff Committed to an Inclusive Campus (FSCIC) p.

    3.]