Author: mopress

  • Resegregation at A&M, 1994-2003

    CHART BELOW
    Enrollment Ratios 2000-2004
    for Texas A&M University
    by

    Race/Ethnicity & Gender
    See “Read More”

    First Time Student Ratios by

    Gender / Race / Ethnicity
    (Fall Semester)

    Category 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
    Total 6,685 6,760 6,949 6,726 7,068
    Female 3,497 (52.3%) 3,476 (51.4%) 3,665 (52.7%) 3,532 ( 52.5%) 3,643 ( 51.5%)
    Male 3,188 (47.7%)

    3,284 (48.6%) 3,284 (47.3%)

    3,194 ( 47.5%) 3,425 ( 48.5%)

    White 5,389 (80.6%

    )

    5,544 (82.0%) 5,758 (82.9%

    )

    5,538 (82.3%) 5,640 (79.8%

    )

    Black 173

    (2.6%)

    198 (2.9%) 182 (2.6%

    )

    158 (2.3%) 213 (3.0%)

    Hispanic 669 (10.0%

    )

    674 (10.0%) 664 (9.6%)

    692 (10.3%) 865 (12.2%)
    Asian/Pacifc Island 251 (3.8%

    )

    222 (3.3%) 230 (3.3%)

    234 (3.5%) 267 (3.8%)
    Am. Indian 35 (0.5%)

    37 (0.5%) 27 (0.4%) 27 (0.4%) 38 (0.5%)
    International 47 (0.7%) 48 (0.7%) 56 (0.8%) 67

    (1.0%)

    40 (0.6%)
    Other 121 (1.8%) 37

    (0.5%)

    32 (0.5%) 10 ( 0.1%

    )

    5 ( 0.1%)
    Source OISP/ep/F2000

    (p.76)

    OISP/ep/F2001

    (p.67)

    OISP/ep/F2002

    (p.80)

    OISP/ep/F2003

    (p.82)

    OISP/ep/F2004

    (p.95)

    Note: Between 1994 and 1998, the ratio of:

    –Black first time students fell steadily from 4.8% to 2.7%

    –Hispanic first-time students

    peaked at 14.7% then fell to 9.1%

    –White first-time students increased steadily from 76.3% to

    82.0%

    Source: OPIR/ip/Profile98(p.8)

    Okay maybe we’d like to see a second thing: systematic reporting of enrollment

    ratios; without ratios, the raw numbers have little civil rights significance.–gm
    [2004 numbers

    updated Dec.]

  • Blogburst for Reproductive Rights

    (this post is part of the Stand Up For Choice BlogBurst)

    Stand Up For Choice: I 

stand with the March for Women's Lives!

    I support the March for Women’s Lives

    on April 25,

    2004 in Washington DC

  • Women's History Month 2004

    Sold American:
    Cowboy Nation
    Gets Ready to Vote

    If tragedy is

    the name we use for a drama in which the
    protagonist falls on his own character, then tragic

    is
    the shape of public opinion in America.

    Headlines Monday claimed that three-

    fourths of
    Americans already have their minds made up about
    presidential candidates, but the poll

    suggests more
    than that. On the issue of who we are, the poll
    reveals that Americans have had

    their minds made up
    for many, many years. Taking up the question of sincerity, for instance,

    a
    majority of Americans tell pollsters that Bush says
    what he believes (51 percent), but an even

    greater
    majority report that Bush exaggerated to build support
    for war on Iraq (59 percent). So

    what are Americans
    saying about Bush? That he believes his

    own
    exaggerations.

    Again, on the sincerity question, a majority (57
    percent)

    believe that Kerry does not say what he
    thinks, yet American voters rate Kerry higher than
    Bush

    for caring about us, for being able to deal with
    economic decisions, make sure social security

    is
    solvent, and increase jobs. What do Americans think
    about Kerry? That he does not believe in

    his own
    capabilities.

    On the fundamental question of sincerity,

    therefore,
    Americans have nothing new to say. As a nation, we
    prefer sincere liars to insecure

    competents. Look for
    a Reagan-Carter repeat. Or, for that matter,
    Reagan-Dukakis, Clinton-Dole,

    Nixon-McGovern. When it
    comes to the question of sincerity, America loves a
    salesman best.

    And where do we find the qualities of a great
    salesman? Not in the product, but in

    the pitch.

    And what is Bush pitching these days? That we are a
    culture at war. More

    important than care, economy,
    social security, or jobs, is our ability to conserve
    our way of

    life against subversive forces. It’s an
    exaggeration, as we fully know. But it’s

    an
    exaggeration that creates purpose.

    Meanwhile, a mid-week editorial from the

    Boston Globe
    reminds us what Bush is selling to the rest of the
    world. Scan the headlines coming

    out of Santiago,
    Chile during Women’s History Month. Bush
    Administration Opposes 40 Latin

    American Nations.
    Countries of the Americas, Except US, Reaffirm
    Reproductive Health Accord. US

    Lone No at Chile
    Meeting .

    “The United States was the only country to

    disagree
    with a declaration linking poverty eradication to
    greater access to services for family

    planning, safe
    motherhood and HIV/AIDS prevention,” reports the
    United Nations.

    A

    simple Google search for “Bush opposes treaty”
    yields the following: Bush opposes ratifying

    nuclear
    test ban treaty; Bush Administration Opposes UN
    Children’s Treaty; Bush Tries to Weaken

    Tobacco
    Treaty; US Abandons Environment Treaty; Bush Opposes
    Kyoto Global Warming Treaty. That’s

    page one.

    Our embattled way of life is indeed at war with the
    world. Bush is right

    about that. But he is only our
    most recent cowboy-in-chief, pushing the frontiers,
    shredding the

    treaties, and sending in the cavalry to
    secure the outposts.

    So, of course, Americans

    feel more comfortable with
    Bush than Kerry when it comes to handling an
    international crisis and

    protecting the country from a
    terrorist attack.

    On three questions Bush tops the

    charts absolutely.
    Seventy five percent believe Bush has a vision for the
    country. Seventy

    eight percent believe that we would
    have a good economy today were it not for the
    disruption of

    the massacre of Sept. 11.

    And 75 percent of Americans believe Bush shares the
    moral

    values most Americans try to live by.

    So the poll numbers demonstrate that Kerry and

    Bush
    are placeholders in a cowboy nation that is nearly 80
    percent unified.

    So

    bring on your Nader, if you will. Or point out
    that America is isolating itself in the eyes

    of
    others. What we have here is a mature culture acting
    out its character in ways that are as

    predictable as
    they are tragic.

    If the poll numbers hold up, whoever wins in

    November
    will be the top cowboy candidate. In this drama of
    Cowboy Nation, is there an

    alternative ending at hand?

    Greg Moses
    Site

    Editor

  • Readers Reply: Texas Primaries

    I read your fine article with interest. As an older Texan I want to add my two cents. A lot

    of Bush’s Texan support is from the “Willful Ignerts”. They are the middle and lower class whites

    who consistently vote against their economic interests and take personally any perceived mistreating of

    the well-to-do.

    Their world-view is concretist, and while it could be shattered by

    trauma, it will never be changed by argument. It would be a fool’s errand to even attempt it. There

    is, however, one political possibility with these people-neutralize them by delegitimizing their Prince

    in their eyes. Keep them out of the polling booths by showing Bush to be a Trickster and a Fraud. The

    UnChristian Bush. The UnTexan Bush.

    Sorry…just thinking out loud. Will keep working

    on it.

    Malcolm Evans
    Longview **********

    Greetings!

    ONE good question which no one seems to be seriously asking (those sterile sub-

    divisions you mention – based on MY limited exposure, they are EVERYWHERE in America …)

    Where ARE the people who will get INSIDE of this new “robotized” culture and will see

    it from the insider’s POV (the roots of this can be seen in the 1950s … the recent PBS documentary

    on the foundations of “Tupperware” are a real eye-opener … makes one wonder how many Americans

    literally cannot even remember their own childhoods ???)

    This culture [suburbs, two-car

    garage, etc.] was celebrated by Hollywood and TV as early as the 1950s … the new manifestations HAVE

    to be mostly updates of the originals … when I was a kind in Southern California [1959-1965] … the

    extreme right-wing was a foundational component of the region …

    … the Los Angeles

    Times, George Putnam, the Christian Anti-Communist Crusade (covered “gavel to gavel” on local TV ….

    Ch11… for an ENTIRE week) in the sports arena [now old and gone?]which was the original home for the

    Lakers (Chick Hearn and the Lakers vs. Celtics playoffs – or was it the finals? with Bill Russell,

    Elgin Baylor, Jerry West et. al. James Ellroy captures a believable “flavor” of the LA-region BEFORE

    I arrived as a 7th-grader-to-be in 1959) …

    to an impressionable kid from the near-

    midwest, LA looked and smelled “different” in nearly every way … my 7th grade teacher used to

    lecture her junior-high class on the unworthy-ness of our generation and how we were typical of the

    post-war generation of young Americans who were insufficiently hardy enough to stand up to the

    Communist challenge … and of how WE would probably surrender to Communist agression without even a

    fight …

    [sound familiar to you ??? probably only if you’re old enough?]

    WHO is currently situated to actually STUDY the current manifestations of American

    residential sprawl (it may be be worse than ever ??? … culture, economics, politics, education) so

    that understanding is ACTUAL rather than hit and miss …? Who will even try ???

    My

    experience is that the sprawling suburban “middle-class” …
    (see the new April issue of Harper’s

    for a useful picture of Kansas, Nebraska and Missouri … to a stranger like me, it rings quite true as

    far as it goes)
    … has always been as stomping grounds of crackpot American politics … as an old

    college prof (San Jose State, 1970) used to suggest, American suburbia is founded on a transparent,

    ill-defined sense of “community” … large cohorts of people are thrown together by economics and

    real-estate developments (and most of the people IN these developments have NO idea of just who made

    all the deals and decisions which created their inherently alienated communities, hence, there NO

    genuine community.

    … in America, economic development is the ONLY mechanism which

    allows people to escape from the corruptions of well-established “communities” [increasingly insane

    real-estate values since Ronald Reagan] … maybe what is wrong with America is an astounding LACK of

    renewal in already-established communities – destruction (aided by corruption?) of selected parts those

    communites has been our primary method since the 1950s ….???

    And now, under GWB,

    several millions MORE Americans are getting screwed ??? With many more millions having little idea of

    how to fight-back [and not even imagining it to be possible] … and yet, GWB has many tens of millions

    of “supporters” who subscribe to the prevailing very foolish fantasies …?

    I’ve

    probably said enough for now ….???

    Sincerely,

    R. K. LeBeck,

    Jr.
    SEQUIM, WA 98382

    [Editor’s Note: In reply, I reminded the writer about

    Carter’s “malaise” speech and how it turned out to be political poison. Here’s the response:]

    PS: Absolutely yes.

    …. there must be many thousands of other Americans

    who have also lived through the last 40+ years who have seen and heard their own versions of
    what I

    saw and heard – artifacts of everyday life familiar to many – all over our country

    Yes, I do remember Jimmy Carter’s “malaise,” as well as the one year (?)

    experiment with extending daylight savings time, the challenge to turn
    down the nation’s

    thermostats, the late 1970s gas shortage (riding my bike to work was good for me!), and the surprising

    hatred (my naiveté?) of
    Carter as expressed by certain executives in the silicon valley company I

    then worked at – it was a very common feeling among business “types” back then … it was as if THEY

    had “never” [!!] before experienced disappointment in a sitting President (pretty damn silly of them,

    I remember thinking back
    then …. 1978/79?)

    **********

    In Michigan

    the issue is jobs not terror. Forget Texas. Bible thumpers will never switch and vote for the Dems

    even though the Republicans are shafting them economically behind their backs.

    As for

    states like Texas: The people must not have suffered hard enough under Bush and the Repubs. If they

    are in their 50s and 60s, they will find out soon enough. Another Bush term will see the end of the

    safety nets that were there for my parents when they retired.

    Baby Boomers are either

    fools or rich to stick with the Repubs. I pray daily (yes, Dems pray) that we can turn out the vote to

    get rid of the most dangerous administration in my lifetime. I still say if the US media was not the

    lapdogs of Bush and company, the American people would wake up and see them for what they are. LIARS

    Catherine Brabant
    Lincoln Park,

    Michigan

    **********

    good one on counterpunch on the oscars, white bread

    and mayonaisse. Of course, black folk in this country, even those who call themselves African, still

    consider themselves American first and foremost, no matter how bad they may be treated. And their

    leadership wether it be political or cultural has long lost their base in the black institutions that

    integration was meant to destroy.

    Once upon a time black folk controlled what how their

    children were educated, the stores they shopped in, the very institutions that were critical to their

    lives. Today, what do black folk control outside of their churches?

    Wouldnt you agree

    integration was the most effective tool to destroy black institutions? As for the oscars, what has

    really changed?

    Thomas C. Mountain