Author: mopress

  • Arab League Tries to Restart

    Voice of America reports the Arab League is trying to get its act back together for an end-of-May meeting at Tunis. A previous meeting had been called off because of snagged preliminary talks between various foreign ministers. But Arab League spokesman Hossam Zaki says Egypt will try to unsnag the preliminary discussions. Pressure to unify is intesified by the lingering US occupation of Iraq, the assassination of Palestinian Hamas leader Abdel Aziz Rantisi, and Bush’s capitulation to the Israeli settlements on the West Bank.

  • Actionable Incompetence

    Bush Begs Us Wake Up

    By Greg Moses

    Of course, the President is more than incompetent these days. He seems deliberately intent, like a boy who has built a tower of blocks, to make sure everyone in the room is watching, when the tower crashes to the ground.

    With American soldiers already extended, with kidnappings breaking out across a country that has
    forever been the world’s cosmopolitan crossing grounds, and with hard-won structures of peace at the very precipice of legitimation, the President says essentially, Bring It On!

    To be sure, the President has not built a pretty tower to begin with. But when pieces of real people’s lives come crashing down, time after time, we should have the right to grab the President’s hands and say, now George, stop that!

    What is the account of things that makes the pattern of this President’s choices sane? Even in war there is a difference between a commander-in-chief and a warmonger. Even as a pacifist I have respect for a soldier’s duty to a commander-in-chief. But have Americans as a nation fallen so deeply into the delusions of war making that kill has become our favorite word?

    Bush’s provocations are systematic enough to be considered deliberate. More war, less peace. The greater the calamity, the more the people cower under his rule. You figure out where that gets us. And how long this has been going on.

    So we can wax nostalgic about that day in August, 2001, when the President was perhaps merely
    incompetent.

    What about that sultry day at the Crawford Ranch in Texas? When intelligence reports indicated chatter of hijacking. Was that day anything like yesterday? When US officials warned American troops to watch out, because there was chatter and scattered clues? Uniforms for sale, Humvees missing. Sound the alarm.

    If Aug. 6 was like yesterday, and if yesterday’s intelligence was considered actionable enough to put the troops on alert–even if no specific time or place of attack was known in advance–then what about Aug. 6?

    On Aug. 6, so far as we’ve been told, vague chatter about hijacking and sleeper cells was not considered actionable enough to sound the alarm. Yet today, a “uniform scare” is being broadcast worldwide.

    Meanwhile, Bush’s isolation from the rest of world is now legitimated only by his perplexing tolerability at home. Why is it not time for Americans to come to their senses, stop the kill talk, and demand mature recognitions from themselves and their President?

    Paid experts go on television to proclaim flat out that leaders overseas are not being truthful. But
    when are these experts ever so clear about matters closer to home? What, exactly, are these experts being paid to do?

    It appears that pressures and possibilities are springing to life this April: 9/11 families pressing
    questions in Washington, Grand Ayatollahs arranging cease fires in Iraq, Iranian ambassadors counseling their Muslim fellows, UN envoys looking for material leadership, and behold, even a British Prime Minister demanding more caution on the ground. Suddenly, global talent is mobilized to weave a tatter of sanity.

    Meanwhile in Washington, a fashionable talk of kill, kill, kill. But the American people and their paid experts have got to snap out of their kill talk. The sooner this happens, the less we will all have to regret.

  • Letters to the Editors: On Individual Assessment & Desegregation

    Letters from the Editor of the Texas Civil Rights Review

    The Jan. 9 statement that announced the revocation of “legacy” considerations in the admissions process, said, “not one student of the more than 10,000 who were admitted was admitted solely on the basis of legacy.”

    If legacy has long been an admissions criterion and nobody has ever been admitted “solely” on its basis, then what about race? Wouldn’t it also be true that during the long years of considering race as an admissions factor, nobody was every admitted “solely” on the basis of race?

    (more…)

  • A&M Drops Legacy Admissions Policy

    Gates: Expects Flood of Emails as Mays Fails to Return Calls

    Gates said he was prepared for a flood of e-mails on the subject and that he hopes most Aggies see this as the “next logical step” in a new approach to picking the A&M student body.

    “My guess is that a lot of former students don’t really appreciate how little impact legacy has had on the process in the real world,” he said. “If the reality is that legacy helped 300 get in, the perception of some Aggies is probably that it’s 3,000.”

    (more…)