Author: mopress

  • Breaking the Blue Wall of Silence in the Rio Grande Valley

    by Nick Braune
    Mid-Valley Town Crier
    by permission

    Last week I attended Holy Spirit Affirmation Night, an annual event for over two decades. Although the event was once formally connected to McAllen’s Holy Spirit Catholic Parish, the current bishop came into conflict with the energetic group and cut it off from the parish a few years ago. But the annual event keeps going and is always important.

    Last year the national director of Pax Christi spoke. And Sister Helen Prejean, who wrote “Dead Man Walking,” was here several years ago as was Fr. Roy Bourgeois, a famous priest concerned about the U.S. military role in Central America.

    But this year’s Affirmation Night did not have an out-of-town guest speaker: This year was a retrospective on, and tribute to, Valley activism back in the 1970s and 1980s. Some topics back then: the first exposes of Port Isabel’s federal detention center, “sanctuary” for political refugees from El Salvador, and stopping police brutality.

    I caught one speaker afterward, Richard Flores, who now has a private practice in Edinburg but was a young lawyer in 1979 and 1980 with the ACLU’s South Texas Project. He and their executive director at the time, Jim Harrington, represented some clients who were reporting being beaten by the McAllen police in the police station.

    On a miraculous tip from a client, the lawyers found out that the police — incredibly — had installed a video camera in the booking area. “Once we had these tapes,” Flores told us, “we had proof and went to the court to get an injunction. We demanded that the beatings stop, that proper training and psychological exams be given police and that a citizen’s board be set up to process complaints.”

    When Judge Jimmy Deanda saw the tapes, he was noticeably shocked and immediately sent his court bailiff to reach the U.S. Attorney’s office. Things started rolling, and they started identifying the cops from the tapes. The story broke in the local media and soon hit national TV.

    Braune: You saw these tapes. Were there really beatings?

    Flores: Yes: fists, kicks, everything.

    Braune: I am trying to picture this. Was it Anglo cops doing the beatings in the police station? Was this racism, targeting Mexican Americans?

    Flores: Actually, the cops were mostly Hispanic with a few Anglos in the mix. It was not directly racism but rather power. The police thought they were untouchable: how could anyone believe a common criminal or drunkard over a police officer? (Police were held in such high regard.) This was a situation where bravado and tough guy attitudes became the norm, especially between 11:00 pm to 7:00 am. That was considered the toughest shift, requiring tough cops to handle all of these criminals.

    Braune: Why were the police so clueless as to allow this gross misconduct to be filmed?

    Flores: Actually the camera was placed to protect the cops from frivolous claims. The police thought that they were untouchable, so the camera was never a deterrent to their misconduct. Frankly, they never suspected it would come back and be used against them.

    Braune: I write occasionally about the Blue Wall of Silence, the “police culture” code which encourages police to lie for each other. It is very hard to get a cop to testify against another cop. Most of the violence, you told us, was on the graveyard shift. But didn’t the other police know about this problem? And what about the chief?

    Flores: Everybody knew of the actions of this group of police officers. The tapes were reviewed each night, but not one single thing ever came up about it. The chief would turn his head and the C-Shift would flaunt their toughness. They called themselves the “C-Shift Animals” and even printed T-shirts with that name and wore them around. Everybody at the police department knew about this. You are right: it was a culture of silence.

    Braune: How did it end?

    Flores: After these tapes hit the air, local and national, there was an uproar. Some indictments followed and two or three officers lost their jobs; other tough ones were disciplined and some left by attrition. (There were some good officers too, by the way, who stepped forward to help us.) Significant institutional changes were made.

    As a consequence of all this, one of the entrenched powers, Mayor Othal Brand, who was a produce magnate, was challenged in the elections by a reformer, Dr. Ramiro Casso, a very well respected physician. Two other prominent Mexican-Americans also got on the ticket to oust council members. It was a hell of a race. This was the first time a Mexican-American had run for mayor — historic. Brand won, but by a very narrow margin.

    Braune: Thanks, attorney Richard Flores, for this interview.

  • Singing in the Boycott: El Primero de Mayo Lyrics

    We got the song from Roberto Calderon who got it from Jorge Mariscal at UCSD

    El Primero de Mayo

    Coro:
    En el Primero de Mayo
    Dejamos de comprar y trabajar
    Luchamos por Justicia
    Y la Libertad
    En el Primero de Mayo
    Dejamos de comprar y trabajar
    Con todo el mundo entero
    En el Primero de Mayo Compañeras y Compañeros
    Les quiero hablar de una cuestión
    Tan solo un día necesitamos
    Para demostrar nuestra convicción
    Ese día tan especial
    Se nos acerca ya
    Hay que anunciar
    Por todos lados
    Nuestra Solidaridad/Coro:

    Sin papeles o con papeles
    Es la hora de educar
    Que el racismo y leyes malas
    Nos quieren quitar la libertad
    Hay que anunciar por todos lados
    La importancia de organizar
    Toda la familia debe de actuar*Coro

    No somos malos ni criminales
    Venimos aquí pa’ trabajar
    Este país nos necesita y estamos aquí para ayudar

    En este mundo tan complicado
    Que quiere decir ser ilegal
    Hay que aceptar que este mundo esta cambiando

    Y las fronteras se van a eliminar*Coro

    Tenemos, que prepararnos
    Para poder aprovechar este momento
    Hay que hacer, todas las compras
    Antes del día 30 de abril
    Debemos, de tener
    Los alimentos, la gasolina
    Y una veladora

    De nuestra virgen de Guadalupe*Coro

    By Joaquin y Neri McWhinney To hear the song, go to:
    http://calacapress.com/gigantedespierto/mp3/PrimeroDeMayo.mp3

  • May First: Great American Boycott!

    Immigration activists call for nationwide boycott

    April 5, 2006

    By MICHAEL DOYLE McClatchy Newspapers

    WASHINGTON — Immigrant advocates called Tuesday for a nationwide boycott of jobs and schools on May 1, even as senators appeared stymied in their efforts to finish the immigration bill that’s provoking controversy.

    The proposed “Great American Boycott of 2006” is being organized by some of the same activists who rallied an estimated half a million demonstrators in Los Angeles on March 25. Now, in a bid to show nationwide clout, they want immigrants and supporters to avoid work, school, buying and selling on May 1.

    “We realize that we have been absent from the political debate in Washington, although we are the voices of those most affected by the legislation,” Juan Jose Gutierrez, director of Latino Movement USA, said at a Washington news conference.

    The nationwide boycott is also being organized through the ANSWER Coalition, whose member groups range from the Free Palestine Alliance to the Party for Socialism and Liberation and the Korea Truth Coalition.

    The boycott, along with upcoming nationwide rallies scheduled for April 10, represent the loudest aspect of a debate that has meandered on Capitol Hill for the past week. On Tuesday, despite some ongoing Republican compromise negotiations, increasingly irritated senators acknowledged they lack the 60 votes necessary to pass legislation.

    “I’m very frustrated right now,” Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist conceded early Tuesday evening, adding, “We’re making no progress whatsoever.”

    Eight hours of debate Tuesday, interrupted by frequent quorum calls, did not result in any substantive progress and yielded only one, symbolic, vote.

    One hundred amendments still await action, prompting some senators — including Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas — to suggest that the Senate might have to postpone action until after a two-week April recess now scheduled to start Saturday. Throughout most of Tuesday, Democrats used the Senate’s procedural rules to block voting on amendments.

    Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid complained, in turn, about past Republican intransigence on issues like the minimum wage. He insisted Democrats would block amendments that “damage the integrity” of the 478-page bill.

    “We’re still looking to find the magic formula,” Republican Sen. Mel Martinez of Florida allowed Tuesday afternoon.

    Martinez has begun seeking a compromise deal with Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, a potential 2008 presidential candidate. Still a work in progress, their proposal would treat illegal immigrants differently depending on how long they have been in the United States.

    Illegal immigrants who could prove they had lived in this country for at least five years could obtain legal U.S. residency under the newest proposal. Newer immigrants would have to first return, even if briefly, to their home country.

    “We’re not anywhere near a final agreement,” Hagel said, but “I think we’re moving along here.”

    The immigration bill approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee would not differentiate among the estimated 11 million to 12 million illegal immigrants now in the United States. All could seek legal U.S. status good for six years, if they met certain requirements. They would face background checks and pay fines starting at $1,000. Eventually, by paying an additional $1,000, taking a medical exam, paying back taxes and meeting other requirements, they could obtain permanent U.S. residency.

    Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, a chief proponent of the legalization effort, dismissed the latest Republican compromise proposal as one that “doesn’t make a great deal of sense.”

  • TRAC: Scholarly Resource for Immigration Research

    The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) today [April 4, 2006] launched a unique new website providing extensive information about one
    of most important and politically sensitive subjects in America today — immigration control. Go to:

    http://trac.syr.edu/immigration
    Developed with the support of the JEHT Foundation, the Ford Foundation and Syracuse University, the site offers one-stop shopping for a broad array of authoritative information about what is now one of the largest single enforcement and control efforts in the United States.

    The first edition of TRAC’s new site, among other features, includes:

    (1) separate clearly written reports on important immigration matters,

    (2) a special TRAC tool that provides one-click access to the very latest monthly data on criminal enforcement of the immigration laws, along
    with a clear explanatory text,
    (3) an extensive library of immigration reports by the GAO, CRS and inspectors general,

    (4) a plain English glossary of frequently used words and acronyms and much more.

    Some key findings in the initial reports:

    — Long term and regional data raise questions about the assertion that adding Border Patrol agents results in increased apprehensions.

    — Of the millions of inspections of those seeking entry into the United States last year at all of the nation’s hundreds of “designated ports of entry”, less than one tenth of one percent were refused entry.

    — Government staffing data show that the events of 9/11 had only modest impact on the overall size of the Border Patrol and the distribution of its agents around the country.

    Also included on the site is a dedicated area with data about long-term trends and regional variation on such subjects as Border Patrol apprehensions, staffing and criminal enforcement of the immigration laws.
    Other data describe the government’s inspections activities at the designated ports of entry.

    The site is very much a work in progress; a range of additional reports and studies on a variety of different immigration subjects — including the exercise of discretion within the immigration courts — are
    planned. These reports and the latest data obtained from the government will be posted as the information is obtained from the various agencies, checked for accuracy and completeness and analyzed.

    The purpose of the site — developed on the basis of TRAC’s well-tested data collection efforts and expert data analysis skills — is to provide the American people, Congress, immigration groups, reporters and
    others with the authoritative information they need to judge the performance of the government in this critical area.

    David Burnham and Susan B. Long, co-directors


    Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse


    Syracuse University


    488 Newhouse II


    Syracuse, NY 13244-2100


    315-443-3563


    trac@syr.edu


    http://trac.syr.edu