Author: mopress

  • Centralization and Control of Election Management

    Brought to You by the Party in Power

    By Greg Moses

    While we study Texas efforts to produce a statewide database of voters by Jan. 1, other states have breaking news on the issue, too. The move to centralize voter registration in all 50 states is being accompanied by Republican-led efforts to centralize election powers and tighten up voter identification.

    In Florida, a House committee has approved a law that would create an “election czar” in the office of Secretary of State. As Dara Kam reports for the Palm Beach Post, the proposed law would give the Secretary of State, “the authority to interpret election law for county supervisors of elections in situations such as a statewide recount, as well as sole control over a statewide voter database.”

    Indiana will soon have “the nation’s strictest voter identification requirement” reports the NorthWest Indiana Times. The bill passed by party-line votes in both houses of the General Assembly, with Republicans in favor. A UPI story on Wednesday says Georgia and Wisconsin are also headed in the strict ID direction, following five states already there: Hawaii, Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina and South Dakota.*

    And where do you think the following sentence comes from? “The plan is to have one central database housed on a server in Texas”? It’s from an editorial at the Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette in Indiana.

    The Texas location of the server worries county officials in Indiana. “They want to know what will happen if the server in Texas can’t handle Election Day traffic when every county is trying to access data.” And therefore, they want permission from the Indiana Secretary of State to keep a copy of their voter rolls in the county. Says the Journal-Gazette editorial board: it is a reasonable request.

    “The policy decision hasn’t been decided yet,” says Bill McCully of Quest Information Systems (QUESTIS) in a phone conversation with the Texas Civil Rights Review. So how did the Indiana voter database come to reside in Texas?

    “It’s not much of a story,” McCully chuckles. Quest has a good relationship with hosting service, Data Return, which is headquartered on trendy Las Colinas Blvd. in the Dallas suburb of Irving. “They are world renowned, fully bunkerized, and have a service level that Quest likes.” In the cyber age of information flow, says McCully, “the physical location of data isn’t all that relevant.”

    The Indianapolis firm is developing FirstTuesday software in partnership with Microsoft. Quest is lead vendor for the Indiana voter registration system and partner with Unisys for a Virginia system. “The base software for the HAVA database will be coming out in a couple or three chunks in the next three weeks or so,” says McCully.

    In California, Gov. Schwarzenegger has successfully secured legislative approval to appoint new Secretary of State Bruce McPherson, who will oversee the HAVA mandated database and, yes of course, completely eliminate the partisanship and favoritism of his Democratic predecessor.

    From Ghana and Malaysia also come stories that show up under a Google News search for “voter database.” The Ghanian Chronicle editorializes in favor of a national ID system because the database would help keep foreigners out of protected businesses and also be useful as a tool for voter registration.

    In Malaysia we can see the future coming. They have a national ID system with 20 million fingerprints on file, enabling 12,000 searches per day to confirm that people are who they say. The story about AFIS (or Automated Fingerprint ID Systems) doesn’t say where Malaysia keeps its server. Makes us want to fiddle with a Lyle Lovett song: “That’s right, it’s not in Texas, but Texas wants it anyway!”

    With the trajectory of technology and power pretty clearly headed in the direction of databases, whether Texas-based or not, progressives will need a better slogan than STOP! So here’s what we propose: no identification without registration. Probably that needs to go to Jim Hightower for a rewrite, but the idea is that if the state is going to be able to database everyone, then it ought to abolish the need for voter registration altogether. To Be is to be Registered to Vote. And yes, that means prisoners, too.

    Note: *list of Photo ID states corrected Apr. 2.

  • SOS Office Reveals Names of Counties on Schedule

    Looks like we’ll have to file a formal open records request to get a “complete schedule” of the “listening tour”, but so far the Texas Secretary of State’s office has emailed us a list of county names.

    Here are the counties already visited: BELL, BRAZOS, COLLIN, COOKE, DALLAS, ECTOR, ELLIS, FORT BEND, GALVESTON, GRAYSON, HARRIS, HILL, HUNT, JEFFERSON, JOHNSON, LEE, MIDLAND, MONTGOMERY, PALO PINTO, PARKER, ROBERTSON, TARRANT, TRAVIS, WALKER, WASHINGTON, WICHITA, WILLIAMSON, and WISE.

    Here are the counties scheduled for the “next couple of weeks”: El Paso, Bexar, Potter, Lubbock, Cameron, Hidalgo, Kleberg, Nueces, Victoria, and Guadalupe Counties.

  • Raiding the Family Room in Texas: Lan Ying and the Rapporteur for Migrant Rights

    By Greg Moses

    OpEdNews / Dissident Voice / CounterPunch / FameHall

    “Family life is a basic privilege,” says Fort Worth photographer Ryan Pace as he catches a breath or two between morning photo sessions, lunch, and a sales meeting. “It’s a simple privilege that everyone should have. An American has a right to live with his spouse.”

    Ryan, age 52, has known his 32-year-old spouse Lan Ying since 2003. They have been married since July, 2005. But since the time when immigration authorities shipped Lan Ying off to Haskell Prison for three months, he has lived with a fear that any day could bring the handcuffs that drag her out of his life forever.

    As Ryan tells the story of his love and life with Lan (he pronounces the name Lane), it is not difficult to hear echoes from Geneva where the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Migrants last week delivered a critical report on migrant rights in the USA.

    “The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State,” says the report from Jorge A. Bustamante, quoting directly from Article 16, paragraph 3, of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 23, paragraph 1, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

    “Furthermore,” states Bustamante, “article 23, paragraph 3 states that the right of men and women to marry and found a family shall be recognized. This right includes the right to live together.”

    The Rapporteur’s report cites family rights in early paragraphs, because the USA has agreed to honor these principles. Yet Rapporteur Bustamante alleges, as the example of Ryan and Lan Pace illustrates, that the structure of immigration enforcement in the USA tends to disrespect family rights.

    Lan Ying Pace left China in 2000 following a forced abortion, says Ryan. She applied for asylum as soon as she met USA immigration authorities at the airport gate. She has a legal record without blemish. Not even a traffic ticket. And now that she’s legally married, her husband doesn’t understand why the American government would keep trying to break the family apart.

    Lan Ying was three years into her legal battle for asylum when Ryan met her in Dallas. He has participated in some of the legal efforts to secure her residency in the USA, but he claims to be no expert on the law. He just wants to make a plain case based on family rights.

    Ryan remembers how on Nov. 30, 2006 he accompanied Lan to an “interview” at federal offices along Stemmons Freeway in Dallas. He assured Lan that her skepticism about the interview was unfounded. Since they had been married, Lan had been issued a Social Security card, a work permit, and a Texas driver’s license. The immigration authorities had simply called them for an “interview” to make sure things were going okay. Ryan and Lan brought along friends to wait in the parking lot with Lan’s 3-year-old child, Teresa.

    Today, of course, Teresa cannot forget the day when her mother went into the Stemmons Freeway building and disappeared for three months. Instead of an “interview,” Lan was handcuffed and taken away.

    “I didn’t have any idea why they arrested her,” recalls Ryan via telephone. “They told me they probably were not going to keep her very long. For two days I played hide-and-seek trying to find her. Then I found her at the Bedford Jail (near the Dallas-Fort Worth airport), where they would not let me see her.” When he went back to immigration offices the next day to post bond, the story had changed dramatically.

    “They told me she had her day in court, her asylum claim was denied, and she would be immediately deported to China,” recalls Ryan.

    “‘We don’t know why you’re bothering with her,’ they said.”

    “And I looked back at them and said,’because she’s my wife.’”

    ***

    Migrants in detention include many classes of victims, says the Bustamante report: “asylum-seekers, torture survivors, victims of human trafficking, long-term permanent residents facing deportation for criminal convictions based on a long list of crimes (including minor ones), the sick, the elderly, pregnant women, transgender migrants detained according to their birth sex rather than their gender identity or expression, parents of children who are United States citizens, and families.”

    “Detention is emotionally and financially devastating,” writes the UN Rapporteur, “particularly when it divides families and leaves spouses and children to fend for themselves in the absence of the family’s main financial provider.” The report is sharply critical of mandatory detention laws that were placed on the books during backlash politics of 1996.

    “Estimates based on the United States census find that 1.6 million adults and children, including United States citizens, have been separated from their spouses and parents because of the 1996 legislation and the expansion of the aggravated felony definition,” says the Bustamante report. “Families have been torn apart because of a single, even minor misdemeanour, such as shoplifting or drug possession.”

    “In addition to the devastating effect that mandatory detention has on detained individuals, the policy has an overwhelmingly negative impact on the families of detainees, many of whom are citizens of the United States,” writes the Rapporteur.

    In fact, Ryan began to fear that he, too, might be jailed without warning, leaving Lan’s daughter without a custodian. So he arranged to have the little girl placed with one of Lan’s relatives in the Dallas area. Lan’s daughter, a US citizen, had only recently been reunited with her mother. And now, following the “interview” on Stemmons Freeway, the family of three had been completely torn apart.

    “Mandatory detention and deportation policy, therefore, has significant effects on United States citizens and the children of permanent residents, and other family members,” says the Bustamante report. “Families consistently bear many of the psychological, geographic, economic, and emotional costs of detention and deportation.”

    ***

    Immigration authorities told Ryan to look for Lan in Dallas or Haskell, but he found her in Euless instead. At least in Euless, they let Ryan talk with Lan through a phone receiver across a glass partition. For two or three nights he could see her and speak with her for a half hour or so. Then, indeed, she was packed off to Haskell.

    The Rolling Plains Regional Jail and Detention Facility in Haskell, Texas, is a 550-bed operation located 160 miles west of Fort Worth managed by the Emerald Companies. While Lan was there, it held men and women prisoners from Wyoming, but Wyoming reported bringing the women back in 2007 and expects to bring back the men in the near future. Of course, the Dallas immigration office sends people there, too.

    Albanian asylum seeker Rrustem Neza languished for a year at Haskell prison under “indefinite detention,” separated from his wife and two boys. He was released on bond in late February, 2008, following a discussion of his case before the US House Subcommittee on Immigration.

    Several asylum-seeking Palestinian families rounded up by immigration authorities days before the 2006 election were divided between Haskell prison and the T. Don Hutto prison in Taylor, Texas. Lan was placed into the Haskell cell that confined 20-year-old Suzi Hazahza and her 23-year-old sister Mirvat, who have since been deported.

    “Immigrants indefinitely detained are left uncertain of their status, their rights and their futures,” says the Bustamante report. ”

    Indefinite detention subjects the families of detained immigrants to the agony of not knowing when their loved one will be released or removed. It exacerbates existing mental health problems and retraumatizes individuals who have been subjected to torture or other forms of persecution in their home countries.”

    ***

    In order to get Lan released from Haskell, Ryan collected 85 letters from family and friends. She was released after three months. Since that time, Lan has reported to immigration authorities on a monthly basis via telephone. Last summer, Ryan said the couple was summoned for another “interview” which he attended by himself.

    “I just told them that they didn’t really want to clean the room, because Lan gets really ill over these things now.” It was a real interview that time, and apparently it went well.

    At the end of the UN Special Report on Rights of Migrants in the USA, Rapporteur Bustamante makes a few recommendations. He suggests a second look at the 1996 policies which invoked the structure of mandatory, indefinite detentions. He recommends a genuine system of independent immigration judges who are not bound by Justice Department structures to ignore important questions of family rights.

    “United States immigration laws should be amended to ensure that all non-citizens have access to a hearing before an impartial adjudicator, who will weigh the non-citizen’s interest in remaining in the United States (including their rights to found a family and to a private life) against the Government’s interest in deporting him or her,” says the UN report.

    “I find it appalling,” says Ryan. “My family has been here since the 1600’s. I’m a 3rd generation Texan. We’ve looked into moving to Canada, but I’m too old and too poor to go anywhere. It’s the land of the free and it’s appalling. Lan’s been treated like an animal. And I’m not allowed to live with my wife in my country.”

    Recently, Lan and Ryan bought a new television screen. Ryan remembers hesitating over the question of whether to hang the screen on the wall. Deep down, he still doubts whether tomorrow he’ll have a family in the family room anymore.

    Related Links:
    keepmom.com
    www.petitiononline.com/keepmom

  • Yet Another Young Woman Dispatched to Haskell Hell

    “So, this morning my young friend finds herself in jail 200 miles from her mother and father and family. She is scared. She is alone. I pray she is not in danger.”

    These are the Sunday prayers of President and CEO for Central Dallas Ministries, Larry James.

    Is he talking about 23-year-old Mirvat Hazahza who has been at Rolling Plains prison since early November, 2006?
    Is he talking about Mirvat’s 20-year-old sister Suzi who spent time with her sister on the concrete floor of a drunk tank only because Haskell is overcrowded?

    Is he talking about 19-year-old Samantha Windschitt, the Tarrant County College honor student who was abducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on January 10, 2007?

    No, he’s talking about an 18-year-old high school honor student named Monica who on Friday was busted by Greenville Police at a “Senior Skip Day” party and turned over to ICE.

    “A sweet, smart, naive, model high school student being held in a West Texas jail for being ‘undocumented’,” writes James. “Even though she has been here for over a decade, and even though she, nor any other member of her family, has ever had issues with any authority in Dallas, she is now in jail.”

    As James searched the internet for answers, he landed here at the pages of the Texas Civil Rights Review, where the news these days is not good for young women at Haskell.

    Yes, we have word that because of a few voices of conscience, the guards are acting nicer, toilet paper is now available upon request, and that a kind of curtain has been put up between male prisoners and women on their way to recreation, but the dirty deal remains. The women should not be there. Not Suzi, not Mirvat, not Samantha, and not Monica. Set them free. Today.

    See the rest of the story–and the long trail of comments–at Larry James’ Urban Daily.