Author: mopress

  • Replacing Immigrants with Convict Slaves

    A Colorado crackdown on immigrant labor leaves farmers looking for workers, so the director of prisons offers a solution. Replace immigrant labor with convict labor. Read the report from the Pueblo Chieftan archived below. But first, read the response by Rosalinda Guillen, copied below by permission.–gm

    By Rosalinda Guillen

    This is a Horror story, it is not make believe and not a conspiracy theory – it is real. With the constant demonizing of immigrants in the United States and attacks on their families and communities this is what we have come to!
    In this country’s early history Africans were captured and brutally hauled to what was to become the United States of America. It took a bloody civil war to free the slaves in the U.S. If you thought that is the end of that, no more slavery in this country, think again. Because of legislation passed by the Colorado Legislature it has become a state with such strict and onerous restrictions and requirements for documentation that immigrants (undocumented or otherwise) have chosen to avoid Colorado; hence they now have a severe shortage of workers willing to work on the farms of Colorado.

    So, what do Colorado elected leaders propose to do? Why, turn to the prisons where they have plenty of humans who they could put out to work! Instead of the slave ships of old we have the U.S. prison system full of guess who? Latinos, African Americans and other people of color! What civil liberty will be destroyed next? First we get sent to prisons; we know there is racial profiling by local and state police forces and now Homeland Security; this is how many Mexican farm workers and African Americans unjustly end in prison. This is nothing less than legalized slavery.

    The immigration laws do not work and have not worked for years, what is needed is a thoughtful long-term examination of alternatives to the current immigration laws including minimizing their impact on our local economies – is slavery the only solution our elected leaders can come up with? This is shameful! Especially in the agricultural system in the U.S. as if things were not already bad enough for farm workers – now we are taken back to pre-Civil War America, we must say NO to this pilot project.

    Immigrant workers are an important sector of our society; we must STOP THE I.C.E. RAIDS NOW and thoughtfully examine how the free flow of labor needed in our country can be implemented in a fair and efficient manner. Out of fear and confusion many people are blaming social ills and a reduction of lifestyle on immigrants when in fact it has more to do with unfair trade deals, inefficient immigration policies and political positioning because of the failing war in Iraq.

    The food on our tables connects all of us, many hands labor over golden waves of grain, many backs bend to tend seedlings and lift boxes of golden, red , blue and green jewels to feed our families. Those of us whose spirits have been lifted with the thought that growing food for our brothers and sisters is a noble and beneficial act are saddened by the continuing exploitation within our food system.

    Friends please take the time to read the article below . . . what can we do to help stop this pilot project now?

    ARCHIVE: PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN (Colorado)

    February 27, 2007

    Inmates to fill the void in farm fields

    Pilot program to help farmers replace workers driven off by state’s new immigration laws.

    By CHARLES ASHBY
    CHIEFTAIN DENVER BUREAU

    DENVER – It may not be too long before Pueblo County residents start seeing inmates from state prisons working area farms.

    Rep. Dorothy Butcher, D-Pueblo, has managed to work out, at least in principle, a new program that would call on the Colorado Department of Corrections to supply inmates to work area farms.

    The new work program would operate under the department’s successful Correctional Industries Program, which helps inmates obtain work while in prison and learn a skill at the same time, DOC Executive Director Ari Zavaras said Monday.

    “We have a lot of details to work out, but this probably will start as a pilot program in Pueblo County,” he said. “Depending on how well it works, we’ll see where it will go.”

    Zavaras, the newly installed DOC director, said the program fits in with his and Gov. Bill Ritter’s new emphasis on reducing recidivism in state prisons.

    Their thinking is that by reducing recidivism, the state can save money on having to build new prisons, which under current growth estimates will cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars over the next five years.

    Butcher started the idea with a handful of area farmers who were complaining that new state laws cracking down on illegal immigration and the stringent document rules adopted by the Department of Revenue under Gov. Bill Owens, have left them short-handed in the field.

    Immigrant workers, legal or otherwise, are too afraid to come to Colorado because of the state’s tougher immigrant laws, Avondale farmers Joe Pisciotta and Phil Prutch told Zavaras and House Speaker Andrew Romanoff in a special meeting that Butcher had arranged.

  • On Children's Rights, We Stand with the World

    Newsweek’s Ellis Cose reports that mail is running 50-to-1 in support of a Texas legislator’s attempt to criminalize births in Texas. But Jay Johnson-Castro answers with international law.–gm

    Hey y’all…

    I sent the following e-mail out nearly two months ago. To my knowledge, not one legal mind or organization has keyed in on the UN’s Rights of the Child. If someone had…there would be Congressional outrage by now…and even an international investigation.

    I know it’s a lot to ask…to keep reading about innocent children that are in prison on American soil. But one day of a preschool, elementary school or a high school student being imprisoned in American because he or she is an immigrant is one day too long.
    BUT…someone has to free these kids and their moms! Who will do that? We must keep pushing until they can “breath free”. Knowing that razor wire was taken down and plastic plants put in the prison hallways of Hutto does not make Hutto any less a gross violation of the Rights of the Child. …

    Aside from Texas …Just ask Tacoma , Washington . Ask Massachusetts . How American is ICE? How humane…or rather…inhumane is the conduct of Chertoff’s armed forces that is ravaging our county? But…don’t ask Tony Snow.

    Bush directs his henchman, Chertoff, to use his ICE company to round up the helpless and innocent…and then spend $7000 per month of our hard-earned taxpayers’ money per child to keep them in a prison cell. $7000 per month…to hold one innocent child in a cell…is paid to a private for-profit prison company…friends of the administration.

    DeLay took $100,000 from Corrections Corp of America…the Hutto for-profit prison company. Gov. Perry took $10,000 last year just before CCA opened Hutto. Is it any wonder that he’s so quiet and has yet to speak out about this inhumane children’s prison in Texas…just 35 miles northeast of his luxurious surroundings in Austin. And then we the taxpayers pay billions of dollars to round up these working people…sometimes with their children…and sometimes not.

    Most of Americans think Walter Reed is disgraceful American…and a failure of the current administration. But that’s because it got national coverage. Treating American troops as a commodity in a privatized for-profit hospital scheme is repulsive. Ask those very same Walter Reed soldiers how they’d feel about the same government imprisoning innocent children…in America…by the same for-profit elitists…and see what they think. Is that why they serve and sacrificed themselves for their country?

    Will someone with a legal or international relations mind…PLEASE…try to explain why Americans get all outraged over the torture camps in other parts of the world and can’t see what’s going on right here in our own country? And these same demented, immoral and corrupt acts are being committed by the same for-profit forces.

    To imprison a child is an international crime. And…will someone PLEASE look at the attached Rights of the Child document and tell me what part of that United Nations resolution IS NOT being violated with depravity by Bush, Chertoff & ICE?

    And where’s the courage of the free press of America? Has investigative reporting in this country become that corporate and ratings driven that the great investigators can’t challenge Chertoff and ICE? Why don’t they demand to interview the hundreds of innocent children and their moms who are not even charged with a crime? My gosh! Murderers on death row get comfy feel good interviews by the media all the time.

    So…what is it that ICE does NOT want you, the media…or we the public…to know? Does not the very secrecy of ICE in itself belie the darkness that is being hidden?

    Is it time for indictments…yet? But of course…who has the power to indict Chertoff? Gonzales? How about Congress?

    How about “We the people of the United States ”? Think about it. Do “We the people”…a government “of the people, by the people and for the people”…have jurisdiction to indict the abusers of these children?

    Jay

    P.S. Hot of the press from Newsweek/MSNBC…

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17552883/site/newsweek/from/ET/

    JJJ

    ************

    From: Jay J. Johnson
    Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:07 PM

    Subject: UN Rights of the Child

    Afternoon amigos…

    For those within our ranks that are legal experts, I have attached a copy of the UN’s Right of the Child…along with some highlights.

    Essentially, Chertoff, ICE and Hutto are in flagrant non-conformance with he most basic laws and moral standards on children’s rights by the way they are treating the families and the children in Hutto and other prison camps in Texas and elsewhere. This is not only immoral but criminal. There should not only be a Congressional investigation but an international investigation as well.

    Additionally, I am sharing the following link. Perhaps someone knows how to access the UN’s High Commissioner on Human Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/index.htm

    Jay

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    The Border Ambassador

    Connecting.the.dots…making.a.difference…

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Jay J. Johnson-Castro, Sr.
    Del Rio , Texas , USA
    Ciudad Acuña, Coahuila , Mexico

    jay@villadelrio.com

  • Houston Election Contest A Cautionary Tale for Statewide Registration

    A Weekend Editorial
    By Greg Moses

    Quorum Report Morning Call Mar. 13, 2005

    Last week we reported that the Republican-led contest to unseat Hubert Vo was a massive intrusion into voter privacy enabled by new voter management software (VEMACS).

    The power of this software to enable partisan harassment of voters after close elections raises serious issues, especially considering that Texas faces a Jan. 1 deadline to adopt a statewide voter management system. (See Help America Vote Act (HAVA) timeline.)

    On March 8, the Secretary of State for Texas announced that IBM and Hart InterCivic would be lead vendors for the statewide voter management system.

    The experience of the Republican-led effort to unseat Vo helps to formulate one clear principle for advancing technologies of voter management: the technology should enable robust voter participation, not increase the likelihood of post-election criminalization.

    After seeing what happened in Houston, voting-rights activists who have been pre-occupied with verifiable vote counting could very well augment their agendas to include responsive registration.

    As technology is centralized to register voters and to produce voter rolls for election day, voter activists need to take a harder look for ways that powerful technologies can be made ever more flexible to meet registration needs of voters.

    For example, what is the logistical reason why voters should have their registrations completed 30 days before an election if new databases can enable real-time production of precinct lists on election day?

    What we do not need is a powerful, centralized voter database that enables the kind of criminalization and invasion of voting rights witnessed in the Republican-led contest for HD 149.

    A press release from Hart InterCivic phrases the challenge of voter management in terms of preventing fraud.

    In most states, voter registration data has been maintained at the local level. The increasing mobility of the population results in voter registration files that are quickly outdated, increasing the complexity of voter registration management and the possibility of voter fraud or inaccuracies.

    The paragraph gives us a shiver, because it sounds so much like the baseless suspicions raised by Republican attorney Andy Taylor as he led a massive invasion of voter privacy in the HD 149 race. When busy voters went back to their old polling places and divulged their new addresses, they were NOT attempting any fraud, they were just trying to cope with their responsibilities in a rather inflexible environment.

    We would rather see a paragraph like this:

    As the vaunted free market system increasingly tosses workers from one home to another, local registration can add frustration and inconvenience to the experience of voting, allowing Republican attack dog lawyers the opportunity to increasingly criminalize more hard working and honest people who don’t always vote for powerful Republican incumbents. A statewide database can enable voters to more easily maintain their livelihoods, their voter registrations, and their privacy without fear of desperate partisan reprisals.

    On the other hand, maybe the federal mandate for statewide registration is altogether a bad idea. It will put more power over voter registration and enforcement into fewer hands and may end up causing more trouble than it was supposed to save. If non-partisan voter registration is really non-existent, maybe it’s best to keep the partisan puzzle in smaller pieces.

    Looks like we have some questions to follow next week. Stay tuned.

  • Murder Suicide and the English Language

    by Greg Moses

    DissidentVoice / CounterPunch / The Rag Blog

    Like fabled ruts gouged into dirt by heavy wheels, or war trenches widened by running boots, English language usage has hardened against all recent attempts to veer away from a mainline madness of selfish and violent arrogance.

    Suicide pilot Joseph Stack wanted to write a note that would supply enough therapy “to fix what is really broken.” Instead, he found the process of writing “frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless.” There was a storm in his head that he could not “gracefully articulate.” And so last month he blew up his house and slaughtered a Black, federal worker in a fury of violent self-expression.

    Or take the case of voters in the Texas Republican Primary who last week cast 61 percent of their ballots for the last name “Porter” because it was not a Hispanic name. Their English-only prejudice ended the promising political career of Victor G. Carrillo, the sitting Chairman of the Texas Railroad Commission.

    “Given the choice between ‘Porter’ and ‘Carrillo’ — unfortunately, the Hispanic-surname was a serious setback from which I could never recover, although I did all in my power to overcome this built-in bias,” explained Carrillo in a pained letter to supporters.

    These ritualized usages of English that we have seen lately in Texas can only trigger rapid-fire bursts of ignorance, aggression, and intolerance. Maybe we have the internet to thank for this? Communication as flame war? Chairman Carrillo put it this way: “political dynamics have changed some.”

    What Stack and Republican voters share is a language they can’t use properly either as an adequate expression of their own feelings or as a medium of critical democratic autonomy. Whether your advanced technology is a single-engine aircraft or an electronic voting machine, if you can’t use your own language to think with, how will you make the wisest use of your tools?

    Of course, the language failures of Stack and Republican voters are symptoms of something more widespread. We recall how the “great communicators” of our political life — from Reagan to Obama — can be most effective only when they work from ritualized scripts.

    If we believe that Stack dedicated the life of his mind to the triumphant conquest of IRS code, then plain language would warn us right away that he was stalking the domain of the language slayer. The day Stack killed himself and IRS worker Vernon Hunter, I received a communication via federal mail from my online broker regarding the official tax accounting procedures for certain trusts: “Please note: 1099’s will never match the original cash payments received.” In plain English: my income tax for these things will never be based on my income.

    As for the bramble of language that counts for Republican discourse in Texas, you could easily get hooked on the idea that Texas government is always superior to Washington government. Until they count the votes in Texas. Then you realize that Texas Republican voters don’t even know the names of Republicans who run the government of Texas.

    To be sure, IRS code is imperial jargon, not a living language. And voting is little more than a lottery of jargon mongers. But whatever else might be true of the new anti-taxers or Texas secessionists, they have not proved that they are capable of transcending the jargon of their own white, racist heritage.

    Stack’s note asks us to agree that against the jargons of power in America, violence is the “/only/” answer. But isn’t this jargon in its essential form as the murder-suicide of language itself?