Author: mopress

  • Full Report of Jorge Bustamante to UN Human Rights Council

    The report from the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, Jorge Bustamante, on his Mission to the United States (30 April-18 May 2007) is dated March 7, 2008.

    The Texas Civil Rights Review has converted the report to pdf format (350kb); click here to download.

    Pasted below is the summary. We will continue to excerpt and comment as time permits. Please stay tuned.–gm


    Summary

    The present report is submitted in accordance with resolution 2001/52 of the Commission
    on Human Rights following the official visit of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants to the United States of America (the United States) between 30 April and 18 May 2007.

    The purpose of the mission was to examine and report on the status of the human rights of migrants living in the United States. For the purposes of this report, “migrants” refers to all non-citizens living in the United States, including, among others, undocumented non-citizens and non-citizens with legal permission to remain in the country, such as legal permanent residents, work visa holders, and persons with refugee status. The Special Rapporteur thanks the Government of the United States for extending an invitation for him to conduct such a mission.

    The Special Rapporteur was disappointed, however, that his scheduled and approved visits to the Hutto Detention Center in Texas and the Monmouth detention centre in New Jersey were subsequently cancelled without satisfactory explanation.

    While noting the Government’s interest in addressing some of the problems related to the
    human rights of migrants, the Special Rapporteur has serious concerns about the situation of migrants in the country, especially in the context of specific aspects of deportation and detention policies, and with regard to specific groups such as migrant workers in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, migrant farm workers, and migrants in detention facilities.

    The Special Rapporteur wishes to highlight the fact that cases of indefinite detention – even of migrants fleeing adverse conditions in their home countries – were not uncommon according to testimonies he received. The Special Rapporteur learned from human rights advocates about the lack of due process for non-citizens in United States deportation proceedings and their ability to challenge the legality or length of their detention; as well as about the conditions of detained asylum-seekers, long-term permanent residents and parents of minors who are United States citizens. In some cases immigrant detainees spend days in solitary confinement, with overhead lights kept on 24 hours a day, and often in extreme heat and cold. According to official sources, the United States Government detains over 230,000 people a year – more than three times the number of people it held in detention nine years ago.

    The Special Rapporteur notes with dismay that xenophobia and racism towards migrants in
    the United States has worsened since 9/11. The current xenophobic climate adversely affects
    many sections of the migrant population, and has a particularly discriminatory and devastating impact on many of the most vulnerable groups in the migrant population, including children, unaccompanied minors, Haitian and other Afro-Caribbean migrants, and migrants who are, or are perceived to be, Muslim or of South Asian or Middle Eastern descent.

    The Special Rapporteur notes that the United States lacks a clear, consistent, long-term
    strategy to improve respect for the human rights of migrants. Although there are national laws prohibiting discrimination, there is no national legislative and policy framework implementing protection for the human rights of migrants against which the federal and local programmes and strategies can be evaluated to assess to what extent the authorities are respecting the human rights of migrants.

    In light of numerous issues described in this report, the Special Rapporteur has come to the conclusion that the United States has failed to adhere to its international obligations to make the human rights of the 37.5 million migrants living in the country (according to Government census data from 2006) a national priority, using a comprehensive and coordinated national policy based on clear international obligations. The primary task of such a national policy should be to recognize that, with the exception of certain rights relating to political participation, migrants enjoy nearly all the same human rights protections as citizens, including an emphasis on meeting the needs of the most vulnerable groups.

    The Special Rapporteur has provided a list of detailed recommendations and conclusions,
    stressing the need for an institution at the federal level with a mandate solely devoted to the human rights of migrants, a national body that truly represents the voices and concerns of the migrant population, and which could address underlying causes of migration and the human rights concerns of migrants within the United States.

  • Saving Rrustem Neza: The TCRR Archive

    The following item was originally posted in the announcement section of the Texas Civil Rights Review–gm

    Saving Rrustem Neza: Table of TCRR Documents
    Date Document [Format]
    Mar. 20, 2008

    Attorney Gibson complains that Mr. Neza has been contacted without consent of attorney [pdf] and Abilene Federal Court closes case to dope and deport [pdf]

    Mar. 5, 2008

    Lufkin Daily News praises Rep. Gohmert for helping Rrustem Neza

    Mar. 3, 2008

    Congressman Louie Gohmert announces that Rrustem Neza’s deportation has been stayed until at least March 2009 by agreement between the Department of Homeland Security and the House Subcommittee on Immigration. The subcommittee requests a DHS report on the Neza case “after Homeland Security’s top personnel were not helpful.” [Also see Lufkin Daily News story and AP story about Neza’s release on bond.]

    Feb. 29, 2008

    Rrustem Neza is released on $25,000 bond and goes home to be with his wife and children.

    Feb. 26, 2008

    House Immigration Subcommittee Hears Gohmert Bill on behalf of Rrustem Neza; orders report from DHS (Transcript)

    Feb. 23, 2008

    “Let Rrustem Neza’s Children Have their Daddy Back!” (TCRR; Letter from John Wheat Gibson)

    Jan. 3, 2008

    DHS Refuses to Release Rrustem Neza from Haskell Prison while he awaits Appeals [PDF]

    Dec. 21, 2007

    Neza Brief (to 11th Circuit Appeals, Atlanta) in Support of Appeal to Reopen Asylum Case so that the Facts of the Case Can be Properly Heard [PDF]

    Dec. 3, 2007

    Gibson Email: US Attorney (Nothern District, Texas) Refuses Mr. Neza’s Offer of Settlement [TCRR]

    Nov. 30, 2007

    US Attorney (Northern District, Texas) Refuses Mr. Neza’s Offer of Settlement [PDF]

    Nov. 16, 2007

    Mr. Neza’s Offer of Settlement to US Attorney (Northern District, Texas) [TCRR]

    Nov. 7, 2007

    Neza Reply to BIA Regarding DHS Objections to Reopen Asylum Hearings [TCRR]

    Nov. 6, 2007

    Gibson Appeal to Dallas DHS to Release Mr. Neza from Prison [TCRR]

    Nov. 1, 2007

    Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) files two bills in Congress “For the Relief of Rrustem Neza”: H.R.4069 Authorizing him to Stay in the USA Temporarily; and H.R. 4070 Granting him Permanent Resident Status. Later referred to House Subcommittee on Immigration [thomas.loc.gov]

    Oct. 30, 2007

    Gibson Email: Federal Trial Date Set for Aug. 2008 (Northern District, Texas) for US Request to Dope and Deport Mr. Neza [TCRR]

    Oct. 24, 2007

    Excerpt from Motion (to Northern District, Texas) to Dismiss US Request to Dope and Deport Mr. Neza [TCRR]

    Oct. 23, 2007

    Congressman Gohmert Calls Mr. Neza’s Treatment Intolerable [TCRR]

    Oct. 22, 2007

    Motion (to Northern District, Texas) to Dismiss US Request to Dope and Deport Mr. Neza [PDF]

    Oct. 13, 2007

    Gibson Email: Dallas DHS Spokesman Reaffirms Intent to Deport Mr. Neza [TCRR]

    Oct. 10, 2007

    Excerpt from Amended Motion (to 11th Circuit Appeals, Atlanta) for Stay of Removal [TCRR]

    Oct. 9, 2007

    Amended Motion (to 11th Circuit Appeals, Atlanta) for Stay of Removal [PDF]

    Oct. 3, 2007

    Gibson Email: Are Rumors True that Albanian Authorities will Reopen Assassination Investigation? [TCRR]

    Oct. 1, 2007

    US Motion (Northern District, Texas) to Dope and Deport Mr. Neza to Albania [PDF]

    Sep. 11, 2007

    DIANNE SOLÍS Article about “Man who Screamed Himself off Plane” [DMN]

    Sep. 8, 2007

    Isenberg Letter to Dallas ICE in behalf of Mr. Neza [TCRR]

    Sep. 6, 2007

    Gibson Email: Albanian Press Splashes TCRR Story about Mr. Neza [TCRR]

    Sep. 4, 2007

    Gibson Email: The Case of Rrustem Neza [TCRR]

    Aug., 2007

    Mr. Neza Barely Avoids Deportation by Loudly Protesting as he is Put on an Airplane in Dallas

    July 10, 2007

    Rrustem Neza, still in prison at Haskell, files a Motion to Reconsider a denial of Asylum [PDF Removed by Editor]

    Bush and Berisha
    June 2007 President Bush and Albanian Prime Minister Sali Berisha (BBC)
    Feb. 13, 2007

    Rrustem Neza is transferred to custody of the US Bureau of Immigration and Customs E
    nforcement (ICE) who imprison him at Rolling Plains Prison, Haskell, Texas.

    Jan. 18,
    2007

    Rrustem Neza is arrested by Sheriff because an application for a beverage license includes a check mark for “US Citizen.” The preparer of the beverage license swears in an affidavit that the Neza brothers were not aware that she had assumed they were citizens [Ismaili Affidavit, PDF format: 338kb]. No charges are filed.

    ???

    Rrustem and Xhemal Neza open a pizza restaurant in Nacogdoches, TX. Xhemal’s application for asylum is granted; Rrustem’s is denied [Court Documents]

    May 25, 1999

    “On Monday morning, Gani Neza, 35 one of the bodyguards of DP leader Sali Berisha was killed.” Gani was “Skender’s” brother and cousin to brothers Xhemal and Rrustem Neza [Albanian Telegraphic Agency]

    April 12, 1999

    While driving Xhemal from a hideout, cousin Selim Neza [aka “Skender”] is killed by a shot from a police car. Xhemel escapes into the woods and eventually to Texas [Affidavit of Xhemel Neza]

    Sept. 12, 1998

    Xhemal Neza is witness to the assassination of Azem Hajdari, leader of the Albanian Democratic Party. Xhemal’s cousin Zenel Neza miraculously survives the attack with multiple wounds. After taking Zenel to the doctor, Xhemal and his brother Rrustem Neza return to Tirana for a demonstration. At the demonstration Xhemal is wounded and knocked unconscious by police; he goes into hiding [Affidavit of Xhemel Neza]

    Korrieri Sept. 5, 2007

    Korrieri, Sept. 5, 2007

  • Further Work on Rolling Plains Motives

    An Addendum to ‘Money buys Silence’

    By Sarah Boone

    “What made you want to know more about Rolling Plains Prison?”

    As I stated in my initial comments, a strong moral fiber is inherent in the people who live in Texas’ rolling plains. The atrocities we’re learning about don’t ‘fit’ the way these people treat others. Granted, there are few residents of the area, who are from ‘foreign’ countries, other than farm workers from Mexico and possibly Central America. Perhaps a lack of understanding of and tolerance for other cultures makes ‘locals,’ who are employed at Rolling Plains unable to comprehend what’s wrong with inhumane treatment of people whose homeland is half a world away.
    Because of this, I needed to know why the prison is at Haskell, and who owns it; I quickly found a website http://www.publicbonds.org that told a very interesting story. In March 1998, the Haskell City Council, the Haskell County Commissioners, and the Development Corporation of Haskell created the non-profit Rolling Plains Regional Corporation to build a regional jail, youth detention facility and a privately run prison. County voters approved $20 million in bonds for the 48-bed regional jail and 500-bed ‘detention’ center, which opened in early 2002.

    That website states that until July of ’02 there were only 35 in the county jail; 57 detainees were sent there that month by the INS. I have been unsuccessful in finding additional information on the number incarcerated at Rolling Plains.

    Management & Training Company had the original contract to operate the private facility. The contract stipulated that payments to the operator and payments on the revenue bonds would be made prior to payments on the certificate of obligation. The website further stated that the County failed to renegotiate the order of payments with M&T, and subsequently hired a new operator, Emerald Companies of Louisiana.

    A search for that contract has been futile and brings up further questions:

    How much is Emerald receiving per month for the ICE detainees?

    How much is Haskell County receiving per month from Emerald Companies?

    What are the guidelines for handling/treatment of the ICE detainees?

    When does the contract with Emerald expire?

    What is the current status of the retirement of the revenue bonds and certificates of obligation?

    Haskell County is not alone – – there are many more ‘no-growth/no jobs’ counties in our state that have created commissions to build these private prisons. Surely, there must be a better way to keep young people ‘home’ than to build prisons to house people with no criminal record alongside convicted felons from states as far away as Wyoming. Prisons, like war, have become big business pouring millions of dollars into corporations that claim they are ‘state of the art’ operators.

    Who monitors these corporations, the suitability of their employees for their positions, and the quality of service they provide?

    Sarah Boone is a retired banking executive from the Dallas area who now serves as innkeeper at the Villa Del Rio Bed and Breakfast.

  • ICE Claims Right to Keep Hazahzas at Haskell Six Months

    Email from Reza Barkhordari.

    Dear Greg,

    Please be informed that a response to the Writ of Habeas Corpus has been submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division claiming that ICE is within their legal rights to detain this family for up to 6 months, because they failed to appear for an appointment. (The family says they have never recieved such a notice). There is no mention of Potential Removal or Notice of Deportation in this letter. The bag-and-baggage letter, which is an official letter of Deportation Notice was missing from the exhibits submitted to the court.
    As far as the condition complaints are concerned, I will let you see for yourself:

    The Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Any Other Claims Raised by Petitioners.

    To the extent Petitioners complain about the conditions of their detention, such claims are improper in the context of a writ of habeas corpus. Unlike direct review where the courts have a broad authority to grant relief, a habeas court’s “singular focus [is] on the legality of the detention.” Zalawadia v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 292, 300 (5th Cir. 2004). “A habeas court must thus confine the scope of its review to considering the legality of the custody issue.” Id. at 299. Any complaints regarding the conditions of the detention are collateral matters falling outside the purview of this court’s jurisdiction. Id. at 299 (habeas is not “a generally available federal remedy for every violation of federal rights”). Accordingly, Petitioners’ complaints regarding the conditions of their detention should be dismissed.


    Reza Barkhordari