Author: mopress

  • Conversation with Saad Nabeel: Part Three

    “While Everyone Goes to College, I Go to Jail” or How Saad Nabeel became an All-American Kid, majored in Electrical Engineering, was Thrown into Jail by the USA, deported to Bangladesh, denied Re-Entry, and Ignored by the New York Times White House Info Regime. All of This Instead of what he Really wanted, which was a Kickass Freshman Year . . .

    By Greg Moses

    CounterPunch

    The following conversation with Saad Nabeel was stitched together from more than a hundred emails during the months of July and August, 2010.

    PART THEE: DEPORTEE

    Q: And then you were deported? How did the deportation take place?

    SAAD: Yes I was deported. They took me out of the room. Forced me to sign papers stating I had a 10-year bar from returning to the USA. “If you do not sign what we give you, you will be criminally charged and kept in jail.” I signed the papers. They stripped me in front of another officer once again to see if I had something concealed then gave me the 42-day-old clothes I wore when I entered the facility.

    I was then taken by an officer out to a van that my mother was in. We flew from the Buffalo Airport to Chicago O’Hare, then to LAX–my hometown . . . didn’t think that was how I would visit it–then from there to Bangkok, Thailand. In Thailand my mother and I were kept in a cell with no air conditioning, which was literally crawling with cockroaches and spiders.

    Q: Did your mother tell you how she had lived for 42 days at the Chautauqua County Jail? How long were you two kept in Thailand?

    SAAD: She was devastated as expected. It’s difficult to describe the feeling honestly. It’s like walking to the gallows. She told me she was transferred three times, denied hot water, and kept behind bars. We were in Thailand for over three hours or so.

    Q: Then you were finally transported to Bangladesh for a reunion with your father? What was that like?

    SAAD: Father was still in Haskell, Texas, at the Rolling Plains Prison. He came in February. My mom’s brother–uncle to me—made special arrangements with Bangladeshi immigration because if he did not, we would have been detained for three days.

    Q; Wait. So your father was still in Texas? You and your mother were deported before he was deported? And yet his status was the primary interest for immigration? Everything sounds completely mixed up to me.

    SAAD: Yeah that’s completely correct. Trust me, I’m just as confused as you are.

    Q: For the record maybe we should make a note here that this section of the interview is transpiring on the day that the White House disinvited your Dallas advocate Ralph Isenberg from a fundraiser that he paid $10,000 to attend. We live in confusing times.

    SAAD: It was to make it so the NY Times article was not contradicted by my case.

    Q: Yes, the Times was reporting that students like you were not being deported. There you were, a bona fide national contradiction. I’m sure we’ll come to Ralph in good time. Meanwhile, you and your mother were getting settled in Bangladesh. How did you find a place? What did you have with you? Who did you know there?

    SAAD: My mom has family here. We stayed with her brother for a week or so. Then they found an apartment across the street from his. I arrived with a bag of clothes in a duffel bag. That’s all.

    Q: And you hadn’t seen Bangladesh since you were two or three? You had jet lag and culture shock? What do you recall about that first week?

    SAAD: I had no memory of this place at all. It was and still is a different planet. I don’t even know the language, so 90 percent of the signs on the street were and are alien to me. Culture shock–there’s really no way to describe the feelings I had because I knew “I can’t go home.” The first week, I started getting sick, vomiting, depression, tirades against my mother, etc.

    Q: And then your father joined you? What do you recall about that reunion?

    SAAD: It wasn’t one that I’m proud of. All my life I knew how to control my anger. But when you lose your entire life in front of your eyes, you don’t care anymore about control.

    Q: But what could your father have done differently? As I understand the situation from talking to Ralph, your father was very close to getting permanent residency.

    SAAD: I don’t know what he could have done. All I know is that there was probably a way to avoid all of this.

    Q: When did you begin campaigning for your return to the USA? How did that begin?

    SAAD: I began in March I believe. My youtube video has the date on there (March 18, 2010). It began after I recovered mentally a bit and regained some of what made me “The Saad” back home. Everyone knows the The Saad back home, and they know that when he sets his mind to something, he makes it happen. It’s egotistical but it’s what keeps me afloat.

    Q: When do you first recall being called “The Saad”? Was it connected to a specific achievement?

    SAAD: I first started calling myself The Saad in 2007 during my junior year of high school. It caught on, as much as everyone hated saying it because it added to my ego, haha. Teachers started calling me that at one point.

    Q: What about “The Official Group: Bring Saad Nabeel Back Home to America”? The first signature at the petition is dated March 26, 2010. And there is a Facebook page. How did all that come into existence?

    SAAD: I started the Facebook Page a long time ago. I was the one who created the Official Group. I made it as a central hub for people to learn about my situation. I would stay up all night spreading around my initial deportation video and group link. Very long nights. But the PR paid off eventually when the Dallas Morning News came knocking.

    Q: Yes, I see an excellent, comprehensive story on April 5, 2010 by Morning News reporter Jessica Meyers. She describes you as “a Taco Bell aficionado and Taylor Swift fanatic.” Did she contact you via Facebook? The story is sympathetic to the unfairness of your status but not very optimistic about the chances of reversing it.

    SAAD: My friends and I have been living off of Taco Bell for years now. We used to say “Taco Bell’s our second home. It’s the hand that feeds. Don’t insult it. Don’t bite the hand that feeds.”

    Ah yes, I am completely and utterly in love with Taylor Swift, no arguing that. The salutatorian of my graduating class mentioned me in her speech during our graduation ceremony because of how much I loved Taylor Swift. The Dallas Morning News contacted me by Facebook first.

    Q: But before the Morning News published their story, you were contacted by WFAA reporter Steve Stoler? He interviewed you via Skype for a March 22 report. And that was a few days before the online petition was posted (or the domain name created). So the Dallas media must have seen something compelling in your story.

    Stoler presented supportive on-camera comments from your Liberty High School friends who called your treatment “unfair.” And you say, “I really hope that someone in the government has a heart.” Heart and fairness? What’s wrong with asking for that?

    SAAD: Yes, Steve contacted me on Facebook as well. What’s wrong with heart and fairness? I have no idea. I still can’t accept the fact that I’m stuck in Asia right now.

    Q: Speaking about heart and fairness, how did you get to know Ralph Isenberg?

    SAAD: After the Dallas Morning News article was published, Ralph contacted Jessica Meyers who wrote my article and she contacted me.

    Q: So you’ve been working with Ralph since about mid-April, 2010? What has that been like? What has Ralph been able to offer in the way of resources and strategy?

    SAAD: Yes since mid-April. Working with him has been good. He has more information to share than any immigration attorney will ever tell you no matter how much you pay them. Actually he’s more knowledgeable than most attorneys.

    Q: And he helped you try to return to college this year? What was your experience of that?

    SAAD: Yes he and I worked on me returning home as fast as possible to attend SMU. Dr. Charles Baker from SMU contacted the Dallas Morning News at the same time as Ralph did and so I introduced them.

    Q: So the three of you worked on the SMU option? What was that experience like for you?

    SAAD: Well it gave me hope that people hadn’t given up on me. I finally felt like I could go home.

    Q: How did the process play out over time? What things were you doing to qualify for admission to SMU and secure passport permissions to return to America for college?

    SAAD: Dr. Baker would scan up the necessary documents for SMU, email them over, have me sign them, and then send them back. I qualified for SMU thanks to my ACT score. Passport permission was not given to me. I was denied my visa because my passport had an “ineligibility” on it. The US Consulate told me to come back January 5, 2020.

    Q: So you visited the US Consulate in Bangladesh? When was that? Did you have to fill out forms? Was there a meeting or an interview? Did they know that you had been accepted at SMU?

    SAAD: I believe it was a day or two before June 30, when the Dallas Morning News pumped out a short article about it. At the consulate, I did not have to fill out any forms. It was an interview. There was a man behind a glass screen and I was on the opposite side. They knew everything. I gave them all the paperwork, letters from SMU, etc. They didn’t care. They took one look at it and rejected me based on my passport. I don’t understand how difficult it is for the government to just fix a simple mistake THEY made on my case . . .

    Q: And what mistake was that?

    SAAD: The ten-year bar that I was never supposed to have by law.

    Q: Why were you never supposed to have a ten-year bar?

    SAAD: A ten-year bar is only placed on someone who overstayed in the USA unlawfully for over 360 days starting at the age of 18. I was under ICE supervision since the age of 17 so I was never overstaying unlawfully. It was always with the permission of ICE. A three-year bar is only placed on someone who has overstayed unlawfully for over 180 days. The only overstaying I did was from November 24 to January 4 because I was detained. I was still 18 years old when I departed the USA.

    Q: And while you were detained you never got to consult a lawyer? But before they deported you, they said you had to sign the ten-year bar? It sounds like you were forced into an impossible situation. How do you take back a signature you should never have been forced to sign?

    SAAD: No i was not able to consult a lawyer nor given the ability to ask for one because they told me “if you refuse to sign any papers we give you, you will be criminally charged and kept in jail.”

    Q: Your case has attracted recent coverage from important international press such as the German magazine der Spiegel and the Calcutta newspaper The Telegraph. Your Official Group at Facebook in mid-August has about 5,000 friends who like it. What are the chances that The Saad will be able to high-jump over his ten-year bar?

    THE SAAD: Everyone knows The Saad as someone who gets things done. A lot of people expect me home soon and even have things planned out for it. But what the public doesn’t know is that, even The Saad has his doubts about himself. We grow up in America knowing that “justice will prevail” so that’s what I hope happens. Someone will recognize this mistake and fix it.

  • Obama's Defense of Manhattan Moslems: Strike Three against Mob Rule

    by Greg Moses

    OpEdNews

    When President Barack Obama spoke up for the right of Moslems to build a mosque and community center near Ground Zero, he pitched the summer’s third strike against mob rule in America and a timely reminder of the power of Constitutional values.

    Pitching the first strike was the federal ruling against the Arizona anti-immigrant law. The second strike was thrown by a federal court against California’s anti-gay marriage Prop 8. In all three cases Constitutional values have turned back majority swings of pure intolerance.

    Progressives may disagree about the overall value of this strike-out in a long game of endless extra innings, but it counts for something worth cheering in this cheerless summer. The majority’s failure to rule in these three cases reminds us that progress in America is something that happens despite the mainstream mob.

    The mainstream mob in America is still fighting a so-called war on terrorism that is little more than a visceral crusade against Moslem populations. In order to reinforce a so-called Christian identity, the mainstream mob clings to an institution of marriage defined as one man married to at least one woman. And then in defiance of anything deeper that the story of Jesus might imply, the mainstream mob gangs up on Maria y Jose to dispossess them of their last scratched-out home.

    When redemption happens to this kind of American history it’s because the mainstream mob comes to its senses and disperses back to the everyday chores that make a real life prosper. Which is why the mob today keeps hanging around so long, since the economy of everyday chores is in shambles.

    As the mainstream mob clings to idols of Church, Family, and State, the federal Constitution is functioning well enough this summer to protect peaceable social transformations within all three institutions. While none of these transformations may be counted as radical, they have exposed the mainstream mob as reactionary by comparison.

    How radical is it to build up a third Abrahamic church in a nation pretty much dominated by two others? How radical is it to redefine gender qualifications for partnership possession while marriage keeps dissolving under the pressures of Capital valuation? Or how radical is it to protect the rights of people to be harassed only a little less after they have been squeezed from their home economies like toothpaste from a tube?

    It’s not the radical nature of these issues that redeems them, only their relative decency of intent when compared to the intentions that would block them. The Constitution gives minorities a right to distinguish between majorities and mobs. We love the story “To Kill a Mockingbird” because we need to feel that it is possible to have enough moral authority to cause a mob to stand back.

    With apologies to the Nobel committee, Obama has not proven himself to be anything like an Atticus Finch, but when he stands up for Moslems in Manhattan, we catch a glimmer of an Atticus Finch moment. It would be gratifying in the case of all three issues if on the big-screen projection of American history, we now cut to shots of mobs standing back.

  • Saad Nabeel Archive: WFAA, Shorthorn, Calcutta Telegraph

    WFAA Report by Brett Shipp: Outspoken contributor snubbed by Obama (Aug. 9, 2010)


    White House keeps deported student’s immigration adviser from questioning Obama in Dallas

    Written by Johnathan Silver
    The Shorthorn copy desk chief
    Reposted by permission of author

    MONDAY, 09 AUGUST 2010 05:21 PM

    The White House has uninvited Saad Nabeel’s immigration adviser to a Dallas function.

    Nabeel, a former UTA student, was deported to Bangladesh while attending the university in 2009. His friends have since rallied to get him home.

    Ralph Isenberg, Nabeel’s adviser, said he received a call from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee on Sunday. During the call, he learned the White House had uninvited him from President Barack Obama’s Dallas fundraiser.

    Isenberg paid $10,000 for access and even compiled news releases and reports written about Nabeel, in hopes of giving them to President Obama. One perk that came with the payment included a photo op and one to three minutes with the president. That’s when Isenberg planned to discuss Nabeel’s case.

    Isenberg said his plan couldn’t have come at a more inconvenient time for the administration.

    The New York Times reported today that the Obama administration doesn’t deport illegal immigrants who are students and have their roots planted in this country.

    “In a world of limited resources, our time is better spent on someone who is here unlawfully and is committing crimes in the neighborhood,” John Morton, the head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said, according to the Times. “As opposed to someone who came to this country as a juvenile and spent the vast majority of their life here.”

    That sounds a lot like Nabeel, Isenberg said.

    He claims the White House didn’t want the news Obama would likely tout in Texas to conflict with cases like Nabeel’s, which contradict what the administration is promoting.

    “Out comes the good news of students not being deported, except there’s one problem,” Isenberg said. “There’s a student in Bangladesh.”

    The White House media affairs office referred questions to the Democratic National Committee. The committee did not comment.

    Nabeel said the White House is censoring him and his cause. He said the White House snub is upsetting and shows hypocrisy. When he first learned of the meeting, he was uncertain of the impact it would entail, and didn’t put too much stock in it.

    “After you’ve been through what I have, you know all too well that things will always, in some ways, go wrong,” Nabeel said. “I know how to prepare for disappointment, so when it hits, I stay strong.”

    The White House’s tactics will backfire though, he said.

    “I’m not going to quit until Saad’s foot is on this soil,” Isenberg said. “And there are hundreds of people who feel that way.”

    One could add hundreds of thousands more on top of that, if considering the million plus people who read a German magazine last week featuring Nabeel on the cover.

    “All of Europe knows about this now,” Isenberg said.

    And now, it’s the White House’s move, he said.

    “They can choose to ignore the case of Saad or they can do something about it,” Isenberg said. “I hope they choose to do something.“

    Nabeel, a former electrical engineering student, lived in the country since age 3 and was deported after his 18th birthday in 2009. His family was in the process of receiving green cards, which have since been made available, but now are out of reach – a continent’s reach. Nabeel and his family have been banned from the U.S. for 10 years.

    As Nabeel waits for good news, he deals with frequent power outages and self-isolation.

    “The kid only knows one pledge of allegiance and that pledge is to the United States of America,” Isenberg said. “What the hell is he doing in Bangladesh? The European community will ask that question.”


    Calcutta Telegraph (Aug. 9, 2010)

    16 years in US and a jolt

    ANANYA SENGUPTA

    Dhaka, Aug. 8: Saad Nabeel, a 19-year-old brought up in the US for the past 16 years, is now holed up in a flat in Dhaka, trying to make sense of an alien “home” and a blur of events that put him on a flight to Bangladesh despite being chosen for a green card.

    The right and wrong involved in Saad’s case are too complex to be separated easily.

    The Bangladeshi boy, who had lived in the US since the age of three, was deported to Dhaka as an illegal immigrant on January 4. Two months earlier, he was told that his family’s application for green cards had been approved.

    Saad cannot go back because before his deportation, he was made to sign what the teen said was a document that made him acknowledge the fact that he could not return to America for 10 years.

    “If I refused to sign, (US immigration officials said) I would be criminally charged and kept in prison,” the engineering student of the University of Texas told The Telegraph in his heavy American accent in his first comments to the mainstream media since his deportation.

    For the past seven months, Saad, whose parents too have been deported, has hardly stepped out of his Dhaka flat provided by his mother’s relatives, suffering “bouts of depression” in a country whose culture and language are Greek to him.

    He still calls America “home”, and says a “special someone” is waiting for him there, though he has begun to believe that “a long-distance relationship is tough to work out”.

    “I came to Dhaka with just a bag of clothes…. I hardly ever go out; I have nowhere to go to. I listen to music and chat with friends (in America) online, which I can’t do too often because of frequent power outages,” he said.

    How did the mix-up take place, with one arm of the US government chucking him out while the other was shaping into an embrace?

    “The problem in the US is that immigration officials here make their own rules depending on which side of the bed they have got up in the mornings,” said Ralph Isenberg, an immigration activist based in Dallas, Saad’s home state, who is trying to help the teenager.

    “Each state has a different rule. It was unfortunate for Saad that he lived in Dallas. If he were in Illinois, he and his family would have still been in the US. The Dallas immigration office is the worst — they take pleasure in causing foreign nationals pain.”

    There could be an irony here. After Saad’s father Mohammad Tarique, who had fled to America in 1994 with his wife and then three-year-old son fearing political persecution, was denied asylum in 2002, he had shifted home to avoid being deported, moving to the Dallas suburb of Frisco from Los Angeles, California.

    Saad would not even reveal his Dhaka address to this newspaper, saying the threat of persecution was “still real”.

    “At one time my father was involved in politics. Since his party isn’t in power, the threat is still there.”

    Tarique, who was the CEO of a German garment company in Bangladesh before fleeing to the US, had sought political asylum citing a threat to his life from the then government in Dhaka.

    After eight years of filing appeals, the family was finally told there would be no asylum. But Saad’s young age, 11, perhaps saved the family from immediate deportation or imprisonment.

    Under US law, the boy had the right to remain in the country till he turned 18, and the government had the discretion of allowing his parents to stay on to look after him. Tarique applied for green cards, which would grant the family the status of permanent residents, and moved to Dallas.

    “We were told by family and friends to keep off the (government’s) radar,” Saad said.

    The boy enjoyed a normal life like any American his age, receiving his high school diploma and a full scholarship from the University of Texas, Arlington, to study electrical engineering. He lived on campus and made friends.

    “In 2008, my father was taken away by immigration officials and kept in jail for 42 days and released with an ankle monitor (which sends signals about a person’s location and movements).”

    Saad turned 18 on January 21, 2009. He could have been deported any day after that but seems to have been overlooked, perhaps because of the immigration backlog in the US.

    In November, good news came from the immigration authorities: the green cards had been approved. “(We were told the green cards) would reach us by January 2010… we would be fine,” Saad said.

    Then Tarique made what appears in hindsight to have been a mistake. He drew attention to the family by asking the authorities for an extension of the permission to live in the US and informing them the green cards were due in January. But the 2002 deportation order was still alive.

    “He was arrested and a notice was issued to deport us. They said we had already taken too many extensions (three),” Saad said.

    Now these green cards can be issued only when the family gets the 10-year ban waived.

    Saad has one hope — an error that he says the US officials made while deporting him. “I am trying to get the 10 year bar removed as, under the law, it was never supposed to be applied to me,” he said.

  • Dallas Donor Says White House Uninvited him to Monday Fundraiser

    Dallas real estate developer and immigrant rights advocate Ralph Isenberg, who publicized his intention to raise the case of a deported Texas student, now says that he has been uninvited by the White House from this evening’s fundraiser.

    Responding to a request by the Texas Civil Rights Review, Isenberg provided a scanned copy of an invitation that he received from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee for a fundraising event with President Barack Obama and evidence that a ticket was charged to his credit card on August 5. He says that he was notified via telephone Sunday afternoon that he would not be authorized to attend the event.

    While Isenberg says no explanation was given for the decision to uninvite him, he told the Texas Civil Rights Review that he believes the reason is connected to the timing of a recent Der Spiegel article about a Texas student who was deported to Bangladesh and Isenberg’s high-profile role as an advocate for the student’s speedy return to the United States.

    “I believe that I have been censored by the White House staff,” said Isenberg.–gm