Author: mopress

  • Harbury: They Tortured My Husband for Two-and-a-Half Years

    Writer/Attorney Jennifer Harbury Comments on the CIA

    By Nick Braune

    This week I interviewed Jennifer Harbury, an attorney in Weslaco who has
    published three books. Her most famous, Searching for Everardo, details
    her long, difficult, effort to locate her husband who had participated in political
    and military struggles for freedom in Central America. Now a nationally known
    figure in the fight against torture, Harbury has another book out: Truth,
    Torture and the American Way
    , published by Beacon Press.

    Braune: I know that your husband was a prisoner of
    war in Guatemala and was suddenly “disappeared” and was later found to have
    been tortured in complete disregard of the Geneva Agreements. And your
    subsequent investigation revealed how the CIA had funneled tons of money to
    the unprincipled Guatemalan military responsible for the disappearance and
    torture of not only your husband, but many people. Given your expertise
    in this area, I’m eager to ask a question:

    The new “Integrated Global Knowledge” (IGKNU) center at U.T. Pan American,
    which is trying to recruit Hispanic students to join agencies like the CIA,
    recently cosponsored an “Ethics and Intelligence Conference” to legitimize
    itself among the academics. I joined students from MEChA three weeks
    ago publicly protesting IGKNU. What would you tell Pan Am students
    who might think it is “patriotic” to join the CIA?

    Harbury: I would commend the students for their wish to
    be of service, but would tell them they are knocking on the wrong door. Here
    is the reason: In fact, my husband was severely tortured for three years (1992-1994)
    in a secret cell in Guatemala by military intelligence specialists who were
    also working as paid CIA informants. The CIA knew where he was and what was
    happening to him within a week of his capture, and they continued to receive
    information about his plight during the three years he remained alive. In return
    they continued to send money and ask for more information, even though they
    knew this would result in further torture.

    Jennifer Harbury
    americanswhotellthetruth.org

    Yet when members of Congress repeatedly demanded information in order to
    assist me, the CIA falsely responded that there was no information. In the
    end he was either thrown from a helicopter or dismembered. Three hundred other
    secret prisoners were also killed during this period. We could have saved them,
    but the CIA blocked our rescue efforts.

    We received the CIA’s files on the case after my husband’s murder. They revealed
    many of the torture techniques that the CIA is using today in Iraq and Afghanistan,
    such as water-boarding and stress and duress positions. These techniques are
    of course completely illegal, and do indeed violate the Geneva Conventions.
    Worse yet, they dishonor and endanger our great troops. When the CIA declares
    that its agents may lawfully water-board a detainee, then of course the same
    “lawful techniques” will be used on our own soldiers when they fall prisoner.
    How patriotic is this?

    Braune: The Bush administration made it seem that the Geneva
    Conventions are irrelevant. In your speaking engagements, what
    do you tell audiences about the Geneva Agreements?

    Harbury: The Geneva Convention on the rights of prisoners
    of war does indeed limit itself to members of a formal army who wear uniforms,
    etc. Some of the current detainees may not be eligible for those protections.
    However, the Bush administration failed to mention the Geneva Convention on
    the rights of civilians, which includes everyone who is not a soldier in a
    formal army. It expressly includes saboteurs and persons who carry out deadly
    acts against an occupying power. Obviously this would cover most of the people
    fighting against us in Iraq today. Can they be arrested and imprisoned? Of
    course, so long as they are given a fair trial. Can they be tortured? Of course
    not. Is this a naïve situation? No. It is exactly the same as the legal
    framework we have used here in the U.S. for two hundred years, and which worked
    properly in the case of American terrorists like Timothy McVeigh.

    Braune: I know it is hard to guess how the new administration
    will turn out, but do you think a Democratic administration will improve things
    as far as human rights and opposition to torture goes?

    Harbury: The CIA has been using unlawful methods like torture
    since its founding half a century ago. When human rights oriented Presidents
    or Members of Congress have disagreed with them, they have simply kept the
    matters secret from them. In short, we have a rogue agency. This does not work
    with our system of checks and balances here in the United States.

    Braune: Thank you, counselor, for your time today and your
    years of work against torture.

    Calendar note: Harbury has been invited to speak at the Valley-wide
    Peace and Justice Gathering on February 7th.

  • Holiday Resources for Texans Unemployed or Facing Foreclosure

    The last week of November 2008 wore signs of worry from economic authorities in Texas.

    The Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) on Nov. 26 announced in a press release that it will begin notifying people with unemployment benefits that they may qualify for seven more weeks of relief because of a new federal law. TWC has an online portal for payment requests and benefits. TWC will need updated address information to send out the notices.

    And the Dallas Federal Reserve on Nov. 28 featured information about RAISE Texas, an “asset building project” that helps to foster savings accounts, tax preparation services, small loans, and foreclosure deterrence. RAISE Texas has been working with the Texas Foreclosure Prevention Task Force to notify homeowners about a national bilingual hotline that works around the clock to provide advice on how to deter foreclosure. The HOPE hotline is reported to be open 24/7 at: 1-888-995-HOPE.

  • Local School Payrolls Make up Half of Texas Job Growth in October 2008

    By Greg Moses

    With worrying economic news we continue to explore Civil Rights in an economic context. What does it mean when Texas leaders point to jobs growth in Texas?

    In October 2008, the actual Nonfarm Employment in Texas (not seasonally adjusted) increased by 43,600 jobs for a total of 10.7 million Texas jobs. It was the Service Providing Sector that kept Texas in the job-growth zone after the Goods Producing Sector lost a total of 3,000 jobs.

    Of the 46,900 new Service Producing jobs in Texas, a hefty 33,700 came from the Government sector, especially from Local Government Educational Services, which added 26,200 jobs. This, my friend, is your local property tax at work, providing an equivalent of half the actual Nonfarm job growth in Texas for October 2008.

    Goods Producing

    The Goods Producing Sector offered 1.8 million jobs in Texas during October after losing 3,300 jobs. Within the Goods Producing sector, Natural Resources and Mining was up 1,500 jobs while Construction was down 700.

    Within Construction, Heavy and Civil Engineering was down 1,100, and Specialty Trade Contractors were down 800. Building Equipment Contractors and other specialty trades decreased by 1,700. On the positive tick in Construction, Building Construction was up 1,200, thanks to an increase of 900 jobs in Building Finishing, Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors.

    Texas Manufacturing slipped to 926,800 jobs after losing 4,100.

    Durable Goods

    The Manufacturing Durable goods sector lost 2,500 jobs, with biggest hits coming from Transportation Equipment Manufacturing (-900 jobs); Wood Product Manufacturing (-600 jobs); Agriculture, Construction, and Mining Machinery Manufacturing (-600 jobs); Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing (-500 jobs); and Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing (-500 jobs).

    Bright spots in Texas Durable Goods Manufacturing came in two sectors. The Machinery Manufacturing Sector increased to a total of 97,900 jobs after adding 300 jobs in October. And the Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing sector grew to 47,600 jobs after adding 200 jobs in October.

    Non-Durable Goods

    In Non-Durable Good Manufacturing a total of 1,600 jobs were lost, with the biggest loss coming from Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing (-400 jobs).

    The Chemical Manufacturing Sector still reports a total of 74,300 jobs after losing 100 jobs in October.

    The largest sector in Texas Non-Durable Goods Manufacturing is Food Manufacturing, which grew to a total of 90,800 jobs after adding 600 jobs in October. Animal slaughtering also added 300 jobs in October for a total of 39,600 jobs.

    Service Providing

    The Service Providing Sector in Texas grew to nearly 8.9 million jobs after adding 46,900 jobs in October. Of those new service jobs, 33,700 came from the government sector of nearly 1.8 million jobs. And of the new government jobs, 26,200 came from Local Government Educational Services.

    In the Private Service Providing Sector of nearly 7.1 million jobs, there were 13,200 new jobs added in October.

    Retail

    Retail employment grew by 5,700 jobs to nearly 1.2 million. Retail sector leaders were Clothing Stores (+1,700 jobs); Electronics and Appliance Stores (+1,500 jobs); General Merchandise (+1,400); Miscellaneous Store Retailers (+1,300 jobs); and Office Supplies, Stationery, and Gift Stores (+1,100).

    Retail sector losses were felt by Automotive Dealers (-1,400 jobs); Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers (-800 jobs), Gasoline Stations (-700 jobs), and Automotive Parts, Accessories, and Tire Stores (-300 jobs).

    Transportation

    Also in the Private Service Providing Sector, the Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities sector was able to add 1,800 jobs, bringing total employment in that sector to 442,400. Sector leaders were Support Activities for Transportation (+1,800 jobs); Transportation and Warehousing (+1,100 jobs); Utilities (+700 jobs); Warehousing and Storage (+500 jobs); and Courriers and Messengers (+300 jobs).

    Truck Transportation on the other hand was down by 1,100 jobs to 119,300. Air Transportation was down by 200 jobs to 63,100.

    Information

    The Information sector was able to add 700 jobs, 200 of them from Data processing, hosting and related services. Telecommunications fell to a total of 94,800 after losing 500 jobs. And publishers of Newspapers, Periodicals, Books, and Directories fell to a total of 31,100 after losing 100 jobs.

    Financial Activities

    Financial Activities lost 1,600 jobs, bringing the sector to a total of 653,900 in October. While Depository Credit Intermediation services lost 500 jobs, another 900 jobs were added for Nondepository Credit Intermediation.

    Rental and Leasing Services lost 700 jobs.

    Professional and Business

    Professional and Business Services added 14,200 jobs in October bringing the sector to a total of nearly 1.4 million jobs. Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services added 7,000 jobs. Administrative and Support Services added 7,400 jobs.

    Educational and Health

    Educational and Health Services added 6,100 jobs in about equal parts Health and Education for a sector total of 1.3 million jobs.

    Leisure and Hospitality

    Leisure and Hospitality employment fell by 9,800 jobs, with heaviest losses coming from Accommodation and Food Services (-5,700 jobs); Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation (-4,100 jobs); Accommodation (-3,800 jobs); and Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries (-3,800 jobs).

    Other Services

    In the “other services” sector, Religious, Grantmaking, Civic, Professional, and Similar Organizations lost 1,700 jobs.

    Priorities

    Something needs to be said after comparing the fastest growing sector in October — Office Supplies, Stationery, and Gift Stores (+4.3 percent) — to the fastest declining sector, Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries (-4.6 percent). As global economic news turned from bad to worse, Texans left the casinos for office supply stores, assisted in some part by renewed government employment in state and local education. If this is how Texas continues to meet the hard times, you gotta believe karma will return good things.

    Note: numbers taken from actual Nonfarm employment figures (not seasonally adjusted). Get the spreadsheet directly in xls format, or find the link at Texas Tracer.

  • After Elite Education in Texas

    By Greg Moses

    When Art Laffer and the Dallas Fed converge on message, who can doubt that Texas elites are listening to what they most want to hear? In a 2008 review of Texas taxes, Reagan-era supply-side guru Laffer co-authored a report that ranked Texas seventh in the nation on an “Education Freedom Index” that tested for “vouchers, tuition credits, and corporate tax-deductible scholarship programs.” Yet, seventh place is no reason for celebration argued the “Laffer Report”:

    “The U.S. rankings are clustered so closely together that a high score, on a curve, still means the state is a long way from potential levels of education freedom. If other states implement choice systems, Texas’ relative rank would fall precipitously. Texas should not see its high rank as a reason to celebrate; rather as evidence that Texas is making important first steps in a crucial and lengthy reform process.” (p. 24: pdf format)

    On Friday the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas agreed that 2009 will be no year for higher education complacency:

    “The Texas higher education system faces many challenges in enrolling students from low- and moderate-income households. The state has a low overall graduation rate and, compared with other states, one of the smallest percentages of college-age population enrolled in college. A recent study by the Texas Public Policy Foundation’s Center for Higher Education suggests that the state’s public university system may be promoting a growing elitist society where only those students from families with considerable assets have access to the state’s top universities. In the U.S. as a whole, about 35 percent of American undergraduates receive federal Pell Grants, need-based grants to low-income students. Texas’ top-ranked universities (ranked by U.S. News & World Report), and those that receive the most state resources, have a significantly smaller percentage of students receiving Pell Grants.”

    The Dallas Fed posts a graph of the “top Texas universities” and their lack of educational freedom as measured on a Pell Grant scale.

    Of course, the ideological packaging for Laffer and the Dallas Fed precludes any outright call for more government spending. The “Laffer Report” favors an environment of low wages, low taxes, and less government. The Dallas Fed is touting “asset building” for low income families. If public money is spent, it would be used to “match” higher education savings accounts for qualified low-income families (see Smart Savings Accounts). Banks would get the money first.

    Between the two publications we get a call for improved bootstraps, the better for the poor to lift themselves higher. And so far as that goes, who could oppose them? But neither report tells us that the hurdles in this race for educational freedom are getting higher by the year as elite incomes move further and further ahead of low- and middle-income Texans, and as tuition increases cater to the elites who don’t need to bring Pell Grants with them.

    When the history of the 21st Century is written, it will record early years when Texas enjoyed an infusion of young talent from the South. What Texas did with that bounty of youthful labor and talent is what the next chapter will tell.