Category: Uncategorized

  • Focus on 'Free Trade' Policy, not Migrants

    Paul Craig Roberts argues in the subscriber edition of CounterPunch that declines in pay and availability of USA employment can be best explained by ‘free trade’ policies that encourage export of middle-class work. We offer some excerpts, beginning with another indication of suppressed public information–gm

    “If outsourcing jobs offshore is good for U.S. employment, why won’t the U.S. Department of Commerce release the 200-page, $335,000 study of the impact of the offshoring of U.S. high-tech jobs? Republican political appointees reduced the 200-page report to 12 pages of public relations hype and refuse to allow the Technology Administration experts who wrote the report to testify before Congress.
    Democrats on the House Science Committee are unable to pry the study out of the hands of Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez. On March 29, 2006, Republicans on the House Science Committee
    voted down a resolution designed to force the Commerce Department to release the study to Congress. Obviously, the facts don’t fit the Bush regime’s globalization hype.”


    American economists, some from incompetence
    and some from being bought and paid for, described globalization as a “win-win” development. It was supposed to work like this: The U.S. would lose market share in tradable manufactured goods and make up the job and economic loss with highly educated knowledge workers. The win for America would be lower-priced manufactured goods and a white-collar work force. The win for China would be manufacturing jobs that would bring economic development to that country.

    It did not work out this way, as Morgan
    Stanley’s Stephen Roach, formerly a cheerleader for globalization, recently admitted. It has become apparent that job creation and real wages in the developed economies are seriously lagging behind emtheir historical norms as offshore outsourcing
    displaces the “new economy” jobs in “software programming, engineering, design, and the medical profession, as well as a broad array of professionals in the legal, accounting, actuarial, consulting,
    and financial services industries”.

    The real state of the U.S. job market is revealed by a Chicago Sun-Times report on January 26, 2006, that 25,000 people applied for 325 jobs at a new Chicago Wal-Mart. According to the BLS payroll jobs data, over the past half-decade (January 2001 – January 2006, the data series available at time of writing) the U.S. economy created 1,050,000 net new private sector jobs and 1,009,000 net new government jobs for a total five-year figure of 2,059,000. That is seven million jobs short of keeping up with population growth, definitely a serious job shortfall.

    The BLS payroll jobs data contradict the hype from business organizations, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, that offshore outsourcing is good for America. CounterPunch subscriber edition Vol. 13, No. 13

  • NACC Reading Room: CFR Task Force 2005

    Task Force Urges Measures to Strengthen North American Competitiveness, Expand Trade, Ensure Border Security

    May 17, 2005
    Council on Foreign Relations

    May 17, 2005–North America is vulnerable on several fronts: the region faces terrorist and criminal security threats, increased economic competition from abroad, and uneven economic development at home. In response to these challenges, a trinational, Independent Task Force on the Future of North America has developed a roadmap to promote North American security and advance the well-being of citizens of all three countries. When the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States met in Texas recently they underscored the deep ties and shared principles of the three countries. The Council-sponsored Task Force applauds the announced “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” but proposes a more ambitious vision of a new community by 2010 and specific recommendations on how to achieve it.

    Pointing to increased competition from the European Uni*n and rising economic powers such as India and China in the eleven years since NAFTA took effect, co-chair Pedro C. Aspe, former Finance Minister of Mexico, said, “We need a vision for North America to address the new challenges.” The Task Force establishes a blueprint for a powerhouse North American trading area that allows for the seamless movement of goods, increased labor mobility, and energy security.

    “We are asking the leaders of the United States, Mexico, and Canada to be bold and adopt a vision of the future that is bigger than, and beyond, the immediate problems of the present,” said co-chair John P. Manley, Former Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance. “They could be the architects of a new community of North America, not mere custodians of the status quo.”

    At a time of political transition in Canada and Mexico, the Task Force proposes new ideas to cope with continental challenges that should be the focus of debate in those two countries as well as the United States. To ensure a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America, the Task Force proposes a number of specific measures:

    Make North America safer:

    * Establish a common security perimeter by 2010.

    * Develop a North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers.

    * Develop a unified border action plan and expand border customs facilities.

    Create a single economic space:

    * Adopt a common external tariff.

    * Allow for the seamless movement of goods within North America.

    * Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the U.S.

    * Develop a North American energy strategy that gives greater emphasis to reducing emissions of greenhouse gases — a regional alternative to Kyoto.

    * Review those sectors of NAFTA that were excluded.

    * Develop and implement a North American regulatory plan that would include “open skies and open roads” and a unified approach for protecting consumers on food, health, and the environment.

    * Expand temporary worker programs and create a “North American preference” for immigration for citizens of North America.

    Spread benefits more evenly:

    * Establish a North American Investment Fund to build infrastructure to connect Mexico’s poorer regions in the south to the market to the north.

    * Restructure and reform Mexico’s public finances.

    * Fully develop Mexican energy resources to make greater use of international technology and capital.

    Institutionalize the partnership:

    * Establish a permanent tribunal for trade and investment disputes.

    * Convene an annual North American summit meeting.

    * Establish a Tri-national Competition Commission to develop a common approach to trade remedies.

    * Expand scholarships to study in the three countries and develop a network of Centers for North American Studies.

    Co-chair William F. Weld, former Governor of Massachusetts and U.S. Assistant Attorney General, said, “We are three liberal democracies; we are adjacent; we are already intertwined economically; we have a great deal in common historically; culturally, we have a lot to learn from one another.”

    Organized in association with the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales and the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, the Task Force includes prominent former officials, businessmen, and academic experts from all three countries. A Chairmen’s Statement was released in March in advance of the trinational summit; the full report represents the consensus of the entire Task Force membership and leadership.

    Chief Executive of the Canadian Council of Chief ExecutivesThomas d’Aquino, President of the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales Andrés Rozental, and Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University Robert A. Pastor serve as vice chairs.Chappell H. Lawson, Associate Professor of political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is director.

    Building a North American Community: Report of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America is available on the Council website.

    Founded in 1921, theCouncil on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments.

    The Mexican Council on Foreign Relations(COMEXI) is the only multi-disciplinary organization committed to fostering sophisticated, broadly inclusive political discourse and analysis on the nature of Mexico’s participation in the international arena and the relative influence of Mexico’s increasingly global orientation on domestic priorities. The Council is an independent, non-profit, pluralistic forum, with no government or institutional ties that is financed exclusively by membership dues and corporate support. The main objectives of COMEXI are to provide information and analysis of interest to our associates, as well as to create a solid institutional framework for the exchange of ideas concerning pressing world issues that affect our country.

    Founded in 1976, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives is Canada’s premier business association, with an outstanding record of achievement in matching entrepreneurial initiative with sound public policy choices. A not-for-profit, non-partisan organization composed of the chief executives of 150 leading Canadian enterprises, the CCCE was the Canadian private sector leader in the development and promotion of the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement during the 1980s and of the subsequent trilateral North American Free Trade Agreement.

    Members of the Independent Task Force on North America

    Minister Pedro Aspe
    (Mexican co-chair)
    Protego

    Mr. Thomas S. Axworthy
    Queen’s University

    Ms. Heidi S. Cruz
    Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

    Mr. Nelson W. Cunningham
    Kissinger McLarty Associates

    Mr. Thomas P. d’Aquino
    (Canadian co-vice chair)
    Canadian Council of Chief Executives

    Mr. Alfonso de Angoitia
    Grupo Televisa, S.A.

    Dr. Luis de La Calle Pardo
    De la Calle, Madrazo, Mancera, S.C.

    Professor Wendy K. Dobson
    University of Toronto

    Dr. Robert A. Pastor (U.S. co-vice chair)
    American University

    Mr. Andrés Rozental
    (Mexican co-vice chair)
    Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales

    Dr. Richard A. Falkenrath
    The
    Bro
    okings Institution

    Dr. Rafael Fernandez de Castro
    Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México

    Mr. Ramón Alberto Garza
    Montemedia

    The Honorable Gordon D. Giffin
    McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP

    Mr. Allan Gotlieb
    Donner Canadian Foundation

    Mr. Michael Hart
    Norman Paterson School of International Affairs

    Mr. Carlos Heredia
    Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales

    The Honorable Carla A. Hills
    Hills & Company

    Dr. Gary C. Hufbauer
    Institute for International Economics

    Dr. Luis Rubio
    CIDAC

    Dr. Jeffrey J. Schott
    Institute for International Economics

    Mr. Pierre Marc Johnson
    Heenan Blaikie

    The Honorable James R. Jones
    Manatt Jones Global Strategies

    Dr. Chappell H. Lawson (Task Force Director)
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    The Honourable John P. Manley (Canadian co-chair)
    McCarthy Tetrault

    Mr. David McD. Mann
    Cox Hanson O’Reilly Matheson

    Ms. Doris M. Meissner
    Migration Policy Institute

    The Honorable Thomas M.T. Niles
    Institute for International Economics

    The Honorable William F. Weld (U.S. co-chair)
    Leeds Weld & Co.

    Mr. Raul H. Yzaguirre
    Arizona State University Includes key players of the April 2005 CNAC report from MEXUS such as Mr. Nelson W. Cunningham of Kissinger McLarty Associates and James R. Jones of Mannatt Jones. Source.

  • Homeland Security Certifies Maquiladora for Border Traffic

    Keyword maquiladora turns up an announcement on today’s PRWeb that a maquiladora company has been certified to ship materials into the USA even in the event of a terrorist attack, thanks to a certification from the USA Department of Homeland Security.

    The company, Am-Mex products, is the subject of a press release by security-systems provider FreelineUSA. In the press release, FreelineUSA announces that it has installed an “IP centric, video security and VoIP communications system” at the Am-Mex “Shelter campus” in Reynosa, MX.

    “Am-Mex has been certified and validated under the C-TPAT program (C-TPAT – Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) as a Foreign Related Manufacturer,” reports the FreelineUSA press release.

    “This certification signifies that their Shelter campus in Reynosa, Mexico is a secure environment that works along with the Department of Homeland Security to prevent terrorism.

    “Additionally, Am-Mex Products is C-TPAT certified as a U.S. Importer of Record for their McAllen facility and Highway Carrier for their truck fleet.

    “Under the C-TPAT protocol, should another terrorist attack similar to 9/11 occur, Am-Mex’s C-TPAT certification of their facilities and supply chain (Reynosa manufacturing plant, trucks and US warehouse) enables crossing the border through the C-TPAT FAST lanes— with raw materials and finished goods, keeping production lines running and customer deliveries on time.”

    FreelineUSA’s IP Centric, FL-USA 500 Video Surveillance Assists Am-Mex Products in Clearing the Hurdle of Tight U.S. Custom’s Mexican Border Security Controls (C-TPAT Program), press release dated June 30, 2006

  • Border Militarization has Killed Before Say Protesters Heading for Austin

    By Greg Moses

    Although the president and Southwest border governors says the National Guard mission at the Mexican border as non-lethal, activists say the very same kind of activity resulted in one Texas killing in 1997. Elected leaders should stop the militarization, they say, before another life is put at risk.
    Twenty activists from Brownsville will stage a protest against the militarization Saturday at 11:00 am outside Texas National Guard Headquarters at Camp Mabry, Austin.

    “They say the operation will include listening posts and observation,” says Ray Ybarra of the American Civil Liberties Union. “But these are the exact same things that were being done by Joint Task Force Six when Esequiel Hernandez, Jr. was killed by a Marine” (see link to official report below).

    “It’s the exact same scenario,” emphasized Ybarra (speaking by telephone from the Austin airport Thursday afternoon), “and we don’t want it in our backyards. Border communities do not want to live in occupied territories.”

    One problem with the summer’s plan to militarize the border, says Ybarra, is that the agenda is being driven more by politics than military policy, and this means that training for the border missions is in danger of not being thoroughly prepared..

    “It’s happening way to fast,” said Ybarra. “In the rush to make a political statement, resources are not being looked at. Politics are coming before human rights.”

    For Saturday’s protest, Ybarra says his group is trying to get a permit to protest inside Camp Mabry, but so far the permit has not been granted, so the group is planning their protest along the 35th Street sidewalk outside the main entrance to the base.

    For Ybarra, this will be the second action of Texas protest this week. Tuesday evening June 20 the ACLU demonstrated in El Paso against the Operation Linebacker program coordinated by the county sheriff. Special Task Forces such as Operation Linebacker are endangering human rights, says the ACLU, so the program was selected as one target for a national day of action that accompanied release of an ACLU report to the United Nations on human rights issues in the USA.

    The El Paso task force is also subject of a lawsuit and press conference from the recently opened Paso del Norte Civil Rights Project. The lawsuit claims the task force is profiling Hispanics for immigration enforcement. And the press conference alleged that migrant women had become fearful of reporting domestic abuse to law enforcement for fear that immigration enforcement would be enforced by deputies and police officers.

    Links:

    Official report on the 1997 killing of Esequiel Hernandez, Jr.

    ACLU report to the UN on Human Rights in the USA

    PNCRP press conference on violence against women

    PNCRP / TCRP Press Release on Operation Linebacker lawsuit
    The first paragraph has been edited to replace “Texas National Guard” with “president and border governors” in order to focus on the primacy of a civilian (and civil) struggle, the point of this issue not being the existence of a National Guard as such or its ultimate duty to obey civilian commands but the just use of its soldiers and powers as tools of civilian political affairs.

    In this case, the Texas Civil Rights Review takes the clear position that the plan to deploy thousands of guard troops to the border this summer is political misdirection that aggravates a logic of excessive militarization.

    “There are military people,” said my old mentor Manuel Davenport, “and there are militarists.” Isn’t it clear that our national tantrum of militarism should come to an abrupt end everywhere? Perhaps, the beginning of that end has come home to roost in Texas. We hope so.–gm