Category: Uncategorized

  • Military Funding Includes Civil Disorder Training

    From a mysanantonio.com roundup of South Texas military spending:

    Texas State University in San Marcos would receive $1 million to train National Guard members for civil disorder missions.

    Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Laredo, called the program an “invaluable tool for helping law enforcement learn how to respond to terrorism, violence and other emergency situations.” The funding was opposed by Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., who offered up a number of amendments to block what he said are unneeded projects and wasteful spending.

    “Simply put, every dollar we spend on earmarks in the defense appropriations bill is a dollar we can’t spend on the military,” Flake said.

  • Waco Tribune Pans 'Dixie Obstructionists'

    It’s a sign that times have indeed changed. The Waco newspaper is not impressed with “Dixie obstructionists,” such as local Congressman John Carter, who are blocking the Voting Rights Act. The only helpful thing we could see in Carter’s action is a little truth-in-advertising regarding the stakes of his re-election. As for the truth expressed by the Waco editorial, we could hardly say it better ourselves:

    Editorial: Extend Voting Rights Act

    Friday, June 23, 2006

    Someone tell us what’s been so oppressive about the Voting Rights Act — certainly in contrast to the oppression that went before.
    Before the 1965 act, a tyrannical majority under Jim Crow conspired in overt or subtle ways to disenfranchise minorities with poll taxes, literacy tests and reliance on at-large districts.

    The act remains the most fundamental and far-reaching achievement of the civil rights era. For with power at the polls comes opportunity.

    The act will expire next year. The House was prepared to vote for reauthorization this week when Southern Republicans, including the Texas delegation, stopped the action in its tracks.

    Some of these Dixie obstructionists want the law abolished. Some say it shouldn’t just apply to the nine states affected but instead to all.

    We can’t argue with the latter proposition. If it’s right for the South, it’s right for all. But that’s a can of worms unnecessarily splayed on the table. The South has managed to serve democracy right under the Voting Rights Act. It is not overly onerous. It has been incorporated into the way affected states govern. It is now, rightfully, a way of life for states that once made the exclusion of minorities a way of life.

    The need, unfortunately, is not ancient history. Texas’ adventures in congressional redistricting, with a Supreme Court ruling imminent, showed the necessity for the Voting Rights Act.

    The Voting Rights Act requires that redistricting not dilute the power of minority voters, something that’s easy to do by simply splitting them into subservient parcels of white-majority districts. Democrats have asserted that the GOP plan in Texas did just that. The GOP points out that it created some districts in which minorities have strong representation. The court will decide. If not for the Voting Rights Act, it might be hard for any African American in the South to be elected to Congress or the statehouse, or to serve on many local governing boards.

    One of the disssenting Texas Republicans, Rep. John Carter of Round Rock, said his intention is not to abolish the Voting rights Act but to tweak it. It’s unclear what changes he desires.

    “I don’t think we have racial bias in Texas anymore,” Carter said . Would that it were so.

    The Voting Rights Act continues to stand between a tyrannical majority and those who otherwise would have little, or no, political power.

  • NACC Reading Room: CFR Task Force 2005

    Task Force Urges Measures to Strengthen North American Competitiveness, Expand Trade, Ensure Border Security

    May 17, 2005
    Council on Foreign Relations

    May 17, 2005–North America is vulnerable on several fronts: the region faces terrorist and criminal security threats, increased economic competition from abroad, and uneven economic development at home. In response to these challenges, a trinational, Independent Task Force on the Future of North America has developed a roadmap to promote North American security and advance the well-being of citizens of all three countries. When the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States met in Texas recently they underscored the deep ties and shared principles of the three countries. The Council-sponsored Task Force applauds the announced “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” but proposes a more ambitious vision of a new community by 2010 and specific recommendations on how to achieve it.

    Pointing to increased competition from the European Uni*n and rising economic powers such as India and China in the eleven years since NAFTA took effect, co-chair Pedro C. Aspe, former Finance Minister of Mexico, said, “We need a vision for North America to address the new challenges.” The Task Force establishes a blueprint for a powerhouse North American trading area that allows for the seamless movement of goods, increased labor mobility, and energy security.

    “We are asking the leaders of the United States, Mexico, and Canada to be bold and adopt a vision of the future that is bigger than, and beyond, the immediate problems of the present,” said co-chair John P. Manley, Former Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance. “They could be the architects of a new community of North America, not mere custodians of the status quo.”

    At a time of political transition in Canada and Mexico, the Task Force proposes new ideas to cope with continental challenges that should be the focus of debate in those two countries as well as the United States. To ensure a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America, the Task Force proposes a number of specific measures:

    Make North America safer:

    * Establish a common security perimeter by 2010.

    * Develop a North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers.

    * Develop a unified border action plan and expand border customs facilities.

    Create a single economic space:

    * Adopt a common external tariff.

    * Allow for the seamless movement of goods within North America.

    * Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the U.S.

    * Develop a North American energy strategy that gives greater emphasis to reducing emissions of greenhouse gases — a regional alternative to Kyoto.

    * Review those sectors of NAFTA that were excluded.

    * Develop and implement a North American regulatory plan that would include “open skies and open roads” and a unified approach for protecting consumers on food, health, and the environment.

    * Expand temporary worker programs and create a “North American preference” for immigration for citizens of North America.

    Spread benefits more evenly:

    * Establish a North American Investment Fund to build infrastructure to connect Mexico’s poorer regions in the south to the market to the north.

    * Restructure and reform Mexico’s public finances.

    * Fully develop Mexican energy resources to make greater use of international technology and capital.

    Institutionalize the partnership:

    * Establish a permanent tribunal for trade and investment disputes.

    * Convene an annual North American summit meeting.

    * Establish a Tri-national Competition Commission to develop a common approach to trade remedies.

    * Expand scholarships to study in the three countries and develop a network of Centers for North American Studies.

    Co-chair William F. Weld, former Governor of Massachusetts and U.S. Assistant Attorney General, said, “We are three liberal democracies; we are adjacent; we are already intertwined economically; we have a great deal in common historically; culturally, we have a lot to learn from one another.”

    Organized in association with the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales and the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, the Task Force includes prominent former officials, businessmen, and academic experts from all three countries. A Chairmen’s Statement was released in March in advance of the trinational summit; the full report represents the consensus of the entire Task Force membership and leadership.

    Chief Executive of the Canadian Council of Chief ExecutivesThomas d’Aquino, President of the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales Andrés Rozental, and Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University Robert A. Pastor serve as vice chairs.Chappell H. Lawson, Associate Professor of political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is director.

    Building a North American Community: Report of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America is available on the Council website.

    Founded in 1921, theCouncil on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments.

    The Mexican Council on Foreign Relations(COMEXI) is the only multi-disciplinary organization committed to fostering sophisticated, broadly inclusive political discourse and analysis on the nature of Mexico’s participation in the international arena and the relative influence of Mexico’s increasingly global orientation on domestic priorities. The Council is an independent, non-profit, pluralistic forum, with no government or institutional ties that is financed exclusively by membership dues and corporate support. The main objectives of COMEXI are to provide information and analysis of interest to our associates, as well as to create a solid institutional framework for the exchange of ideas concerning pressing world issues that affect our country.

    Founded in 1976, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives is Canada’s premier business association, with an outstanding record of achievement in matching entrepreneurial initiative with sound public policy choices. A not-for-profit, non-partisan organization composed of the chief executives of 150 leading Canadian enterprises, the CCCE was the Canadian private sector leader in the development and promotion of the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement during the 1980s and of the subsequent trilateral North American Free Trade Agreement.

    Members of the Independent Task Force on North America

    Minister Pedro Aspe
    (Mexican co-chair)
    Protego

    Mr. Thomas S. Axworthy
    Queen’s University

    Ms. Heidi S. Cruz
    Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

    Mr. Nelson W. Cunningham
    Kissinger McLarty Associates

    Mr. Thomas P. d’Aquino
    (Canadian co-vice chair)
    Canadian Council of Chief Executives

    Mr. Alfonso de Angoitia
    Grupo Televisa, S.A.

    Dr. Luis de La Calle Pardo
    De la Calle, Madrazo, Mancera, S.C.

    Professor Wendy K. Dobson
    University of Toronto

    Dr. Robert A. Pastor (U.S. co-vice chair)
    American University

    Mr. Andrés Rozental
    (Mexican co-vice chair)
    Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales

    Dr. Richard A. Falkenrath
    The
    Bro
    okings Institution

    Dr. Rafael Fernandez de Castro
    Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México

    Mr. Ramón Alberto Garza
    Montemedia

    The Honorable Gordon D. Giffin
    McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP

    Mr. Allan Gotlieb
    Donner Canadian Foundation

    Mr. Michael Hart
    Norman Paterson School of International Affairs

    Mr. Carlos Heredia
    Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales

    The Honorable Carla A. Hills
    Hills & Company

    Dr. Gary C. Hufbauer
    Institute for International Economics

    Dr. Luis Rubio
    CIDAC

    Dr. Jeffrey J. Schott
    Institute for International Economics

    Mr. Pierre Marc Johnson
    Heenan Blaikie

    The Honorable James R. Jones
    Manatt Jones Global Strategies

    Dr. Chappell H. Lawson (Task Force Director)
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    The Honourable John P. Manley (Canadian co-chair)
    McCarthy Tetrault

    Mr. David McD. Mann
    Cox Hanson O’Reilly Matheson

    Ms. Doris M. Meissner
    Migration Policy Institute

    The Honorable Thomas M.T. Niles
    Institute for International Economics

    The Honorable William F. Weld (U.S. co-chair)
    Leeds Weld & Co.

    Mr. Raul H. Yzaguirre
    Arizona State University Includes key players of the April 2005 CNAC report from MEXUS such as Mr. Nelson W. Cunningham of Kissinger McLarty Associates and James R. Jones of Mannatt Jones. Source.

  • Homeland Security Certifies Maquiladora for Border Traffic

    Keyword maquiladora turns up an announcement on today’s PRWeb that a maquiladora company has been certified to ship materials into the USA even in the event of a terrorist attack, thanks to a certification from the USA Department of Homeland Security.

    The company, Am-Mex products, is the subject of a press release by security-systems provider FreelineUSA. In the press release, FreelineUSA announces that it has installed an “IP centric, video security and VoIP communications system” at the Am-Mex “Shelter campus” in Reynosa, MX.

    “Am-Mex has been certified and validated under the C-TPAT program (C-TPAT – Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) as a Foreign Related Manufacturer,” reports the FreelineUSA press release.

    “This certification signifies that their Shelter campus in Reynosa, Mexico is a secure environment that works along with the Department of Homeland Security to prevent terrorism.

    “Additionally, Am-Mex Products is C-TPAT certified as a U.S. Importer of Record for their McAllen facility and Highway Carrier for their truck fleet.

    “Under the C-TPAT protocol, should another terrorist attack similar to 9/11 occur, Am-Mex’s C-TPAT certification of their facilities and supply chain (Reynosa manufacturing plant, trucks and US warehouse) enables crossing the border through the C-TPAT FAST lanes— with raw materials and finished goods, keeping production lines running and customer deliveries on time.”

    FreelineUSA’s IP Centric, FL-USA 500 Video Surveillance Assists Am-Mex Products in Clearing the Hurdle of Tight U.S. Custom’s Mexican Border Security Controls (C-TPAT Program), press release dated June 30, 2006