Category: Uncategorized

  • Resegregation at A&M, 1994-2003

    CHART BELOW
    Enrollment Ratios 2000-2004
    for Texas A&M University
    by

    Race/Ethnicity & Gender
    See “Read More”

    First Time Student Ratios by

    Gender / Race / Ethnicity
    (Fall Semester)

    Category 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
    Total 6,685 6,760 6,949 6,726 7,068
    Female 3,497 (52.3%) 3,476 (51.4%) 3,665 (52.7%) 3,532 ( 52.5%) 3,643 ( 51.5%)
    Male 3,188 (47.7%)

    3,284 (48.6%) 3,284 (47.3%)

    3,194 ( 47.5%) 3,425 ( 48.5%)

    White 5,389 (80.6%

    )

    5,544 (82.0%) 5,758 (82.9%

    )

    5,538 (82.3%) 5,640 (79.8%

    )

    Black 173

    (2.6%)

    198 (2.9%) 182 (2.6%

    )

    158 (2.3%) 213 (3.0%)

    Hispanic 669 (10.0%

    )

    674 (10.0%) 664 (9.6%)

    692 (10.3%) 865 (12.2%)
    Asian/Pacifc Island 251 (3.8%

    )

    222 (3.3%) 230 (3.3%)

    234 (3.5%) 267 (3.8%)
    Am. Indian 35 (0.5%)

    37 (0.5%) 27 (0.4%) 27 (0.4%) 38 (0.5%)
    International 47 (0.7%) 48 (0.7%) 56 (0.8%) 67

    (1.0%)

    40 (0.6%)
    Other 121 (1.8%) 37

    (0.5%)

    32 (0.5%) 10 ( 0.1%

    )

    5 ( 0.1%)
    Source OISP/ep/F2000

    (p.76)

    OISP/ep/F2001

    (p.67)

    OISP/ep/F2002

    (p.80)

    OISP/ep/F2003

    (p.82)

    OISP/ep/F2004

    (p.95)

    Note: Between 1994 and 1998, the ratio of:

    –Black first time students fell steadily from 4.8% to 2.7%

    –Hispanic first-time students

    peaked at 14.7% then fell to 9.1%

    –White first-time students increased steadily from 76.3% to

    82.0%

    Source: OPIR/ip/Profile98(p.8)

    Okay maybe we’d like to see a second thing: systematic reporting of enrollment

    ratios; without ratios, the raw numbers have little civil rights significance.–gm
    [2004 numbers

    updated Dec.]

  • Student Senate "Diversity" Team Splits Rally

    SGA severs ties with FCIC due to diversity
    By James Twine
    Published:

    Friday, February 13, 2004

    The Texas A&M Student Senate severed ties with the Faculty

    Committed to an Inclusive Campus (FCIC), due to differences in race-based admissions

    ideals.

    The two organizations had scheduled a Feb. 18 diversity march before they

    realized their agenda differences, said Student Services Chair John Mathews.

    Although

    both organizations support diversity, the FCICsupports race-based admissions and SGA opposes race being

    a factor in admissions criteria, Mathews said…. The Student Senate has authorized its diversity

    team to organize a march of its own to be called Aggie March for Merit, beginning at 3:15 p.m. on Feb.

    18.

    The SGA march supports the admissions policy instituted by Gates as well as the

    progress it will represent for diversity at A&M.

    Mathews said he was disturbed because

    the FCIC withheld information from SGA and others.

    “So many people had united for this

    cause, and to now realize that FCIC was cause, and to now realize that FCIC was hiding behind this

    secret agenda is upsetting,” he said.[sic]

    The bill commended Gates’ admissions

    policy.

    “(Gates’) admissions policy will lead to greater diversity at A&M, and we

    fully support his bold decision to affirm the dignity and worth of every person by making individual

    merit the only criterion for admission and refusing to institutionalize discrimination on the basis of

    race, legacy, sexual orientation or any other demographic characteristic unrelated to individual

    merit,” according to the bill.

  • Diez y Seis de Septiembre 2004: A Talk

    By Marco Portales

    Thank you for joining us to celebrate Hispanic Heritage

    Month at Texas A&M this year.

    Many people need to be thanked for organizing the festive

    activities planned between September 16 and October 15, 2004. Let’s hear an _expression of

    appreciation for the organizers, the Hispanic Presidents Council, the Professional Hispanic Network,

    the Aggie Memorial Student Center, Dr. James Anderson, V.P. for Institutional Diversity and Assessment,

    Dr. Dean Bresgiani, V.P. for Student Affairs, and the group I represent here, MALFA, the Mexican

    American/Latino Faculty Association.

    Since I mentioned MALFA, I want to use this opportunity

    to let all new Aggies know that, after working with the University’s administration for more than two

    years, on May 28, 2004 the Board of Regents accepted President Gates’ recommendation to create MALRC,

    the Mexican American/U.S. Latino Research Center. Currently a search committee is in the process of

    selecting the founding director for a research center that seeks to study all aspects of the Latino

    experience. Why? Because Latinos in the U.S. now number roughly 40 million people, including more

    than 7 million Latinos here in Texas.

    We, the Texas A&M Mexican American and Latino

    faculty, are convinced that we need new knowledge and information about the largest American ethnic

    group in virtually every discipline under the sun. Latinos, as we know, hail from all races and from

    21 different countries. El Diez y Seis de Septiembre celebrates Mexico’s independence from Spain in

    1821, but each of the other 20 Spanish-speaking countries also has its own history and stories of

    independence.

    On a festive day like today, ordinarily we talk about the past, about the

    Diez y Seis de Septiembre, about El Grito de la Independencia promoted by Father Miguel Hidalgo in

    Mexico, but, given where Latinos are today in the U.S., we need to consider the Latino Present because

    that will shape our future.

    When I was your age and in college more than 35 years ago, I

    longed to read books written by Mexican American writers. I wanted to read books that spoke to the

    world about our Latino lives and experiences in the United States. After all, Texas belonged to the

    Spanish empire for 308 years before the Battle of San Jacinto ushered in The Republic of Texas in 1836.

    For 308 years, the language of Texas era el Español, Spanish, and Hispanics or Latinos resided

    throughout the Southwest in the areas known today as New Mexico, Arizona, California, and the southern

    parts of Utah, Nevada, and Colorado. But following the 1846 to 1848 War with Mexico declared by

    President Polk, all of these lands, or 55% of the land that Mexico owned was ceded to the United States

    for the nominal sum of $15 million, the same amount of money that Thomas Jefferson bought the Louisiana

    Purchase from France in 1803. Such was the power of Manifest Destiny, the idea that God intended the

    people of the U.S. to take over Native American lands from the Atlantic to the Pacific. That story, as

    we know, is known as American History; and, as all of you know well, students are required to take

    courses in that area.

    What we are not required to take are courses in the people who

    were displaced, the people whose histories we have know about and who have had to tough it out for many

    generations. Over the years, I have discovered that is why Mexican Americans and Native Americans have

    not written books that are widely known. In college I read Ralph Waldo Emerson, the writer who said

    that every generation writes its own books. So where are the books written by the previous generations

    of Mexican Americans, I asked when I was 19.

    Well, our Latino ancestors were too busy,

    struggling to make a living. They did not have the luxury of writing books. When one did, such as

    Americo Paredes, who finished writing George Washington Gomez when he was 25 in 1940, editors told him

    they were not interested in publishing the work of a Mexican American because they felt no one would

    read such books. That is why Paredes’ book was put away and not brought out until 1990, or half a

    century later, a year before I arrived at Texas A&M to teach.

    Today, Latinos have

    definitely arrived as far as the public consciousness is concerned. But here is the important point:

    we have been here all along. Partially to celebrate that fact and mainly to provide you with what I

    did not have when I was your age, I have been writing some books about the Latino experience since

    arriving on campus. In November the Texas A&M University Press will published my nonfiction book,

    “Latino Sun, Rising: Our Spanish-speaking U.S. World.” I wrote this book to share my experiences and

    to provide future generations with some life stories, the type of stories that I missed when I was

    growing up. It seems to me that people can use some narratives for traction, as it were, on which each

    of you students can build your own future contributions.

    Our challenge essentially means

    that you have to ask your professors what the Latino contribution has been. We study and study and, as

    most of you know, the disciplines and areas that most of you are required to study tend to be silent

    about Latinos. How can it be that Latinos have lived in Texas and in the Southwest since 1528 when

    Cabeza de Vaca roamed Texas and have so little to show for it? That is 476 years. How can Spanish-

    speakers live for 24 generations (count them) and not have more than a handful of known books that tell

    us stories about ourselves? How many of us, for example, can name, say, 5 Latino books? Try it. You

    now know George Washington Gomez by Americo Paredes. Any other ones that immediately jump to mind?

    People who know the field, of course, can name titles and authors, but most Americans will find the

    challenge difficult.

    There are, of course, other answers to the questions we are

    raising. It is difficult to change the status quo, or the way things are. Why? Because the status

    quo tends to block solutions to our needs. Because power concentrations usually run on established

    tracks that have not traditionally taken us into account, brought us into the picture.

    That is why, as Aggies, we need to encourage you to network, to learn how to develop common

    goals so that the “Hispanic Voice” repeatedly emphasizes our needs and desires.

    What we

    need to pursue is what I am beginning to call Integrative Research. Integrative research because

    Latinos have always been part of American society. Integrative Research because we need to discover

    and then articulate how we have always been here and what we have done. Integrative Research because

    most of us do not know about our Latino accomplishments and the nature of the lives of previous

    generations, because we have not been seen as players, participants and doers. This means that even

    ancestors who have been exceptions to the rule have not often received credit for their achievements

    and contributions. Let me give you a backyard example on which I will close.

    I was

    walking by, admiring the new Chemical Engineering building that Texas A&M is building on the north side

    of campus next to where the English Department is housed in Blocker. Working on the grounds, I saw a

    worker who looked at me as I passed, so I said that the building looked very attractive. Without

    skipping a beat, he quipped, “Si y todos somos Mejicanos,” that is, “Yes, and all of the workers are

    Mexicans.” Do you think that the workers who helped build the wonderful-looking Chemical Engineering

    building will even be in the pictures that we will see when the building is dedicated? Take a look at

    the ground-breaking pictures of the people credited for building the George Bush School of Public

    Service and that will tell us something.

    I teach an Asian American nove
    l by Frank Chin

    ca
    lled Donald Duk (1991). In this imaginative recreation of history, Chinese American workers who were

    hired to lay track for the Transcontinental Railroad from 1865 to 1869 were systematically excluded

    from the American History book pictures. The Irish crews, on the other hand, the workers who “looked”

    more “American” to the Public Relations-minded railroad leaders were given picture credit for building

    the railroad– at the expense of the Chinese workers who were left out of the history books. Chin’s

    novel attempts to rectify that fact. But how many people have read Chin’s work? Since we do not know

    of that historical injustice, do we notice that the Mexican workers won’t be given much credit for

    helping to build that building and others on campus?

    I hope you can now see why we have

    to carry out Integrative Research that will help us to include or integrate and then articulate us into

    past history so that we can have a better present. By doing so, our Mexican, Mexican American and

    Latino sons and daughters will gain confidence in themselves because they will know that their parents,

    or people who looked like them, worked in constructing these buildings. They will have a vested

    interest in Texas A&M because the energies of their parents have been invested in this campus. The

    campus will not be a foreign, intimidating place, but a place that they will want to be at, and perhaps

    graduate from.

    If we educate our sons and daughters better, perhaps some of the

    chemical engineers working in that building in 15 to 20 years will also be the offspring of those

    Mexican workers. If we do not make a conscious effort to include them and other Latinos in American

    society, history has shown us that we will be left out, much as I argue in “Crowding Out Latinos.”

    (2000) If we do not change how Latinos are seen, we will always continue to look like new arrivals,

    when, indeed, most of us have been here all along–for more than 20 generations, as we have seen. To

    put more than 20 generations in perspective, we need to remember that we have only had about 6

    generations of Aggies since Texas A&M was founded in 1876. And that we are only about 11 generations

    or so away from the 1776 U.S. Declaration of Independence.

    Thank you for your kind

    attention.

  • Archive: Feb. 2004 Cover Story

    Feb. 2004

    “We Don’t Want to Integrate!”

    That was the outcry

    made by 4,000 students in 1963 when Texas A&M President, General Earl Rudder, convened a campus forum

    to discuss plans to admit women. According to the Brazos Genealogical Society online, “Rudder’s

    concluding remarks are drowned out by a chorus of boos.”
    Even today at the College Station

    campus, if 4,000 people are shouting together about something, it will not be a good day for

    diversity.

    How do we approach these persistent and discouraging dynamics? During Black

    History Month, we are going to try to keep our scholarly wits. There are crucial questions to

    answer.

    For instance, we have yet to locate a document that supports the Texas A&M

    announcement to extend the vestiges of Hopwood. We tried looking in the Regents’ agenda packet, but

    there was absolutely no mention of race or affirmative action there.

    Where is the

    documentary trail that leads to the decision to uphold the vestiges of Hopwood and why was it made? It

    is remarkable that the Regents didn’t put a single word in writing.

    Professor Marco

    Portales reports that A&M President Robert Gates met with “minority” faculty on Dec. 18, two weeks

    after the announcement was made. So who did he meet with before?

    As we continue to

    collect materials and to think about the possibilities of winning a civil rights victory, we cannot

    forget that we live in a state rich with civil rights intelligence. James Farmer, Sr., taught at Sam

    Huston College in Austin (now Huston-Tillotson) and Wiley College in Marshall. He raised up a son,

    alright, who was not a Young Conservative.

    And speaking of Wiley College, we marvel at

    the golden age of scholars who would today still be considered heroic for their intellectual

    courage.

    Oliver Cromwell Cox, for instance, who taught at Wiley College, wrote a durable

    analysis of Caste, Class, and Race. For him, the anti-integration fervor of young people was not to be

    explained by any innate tendencies to wickedness. These attitudes have to be cultivated. And behind

    that cultivation, Cox looked for interests served.

    So how do we understand the

    conditions that cultivate such dreadful images as jungle parties, affirmative action bake sales, and

    open protests against the arrival of a Vice President for Diversity?

    As we continue to

    sift for documentary evidence, we will also continue to read our Black History and reflect on the Texas

    struggles that have brought us this far.

    And we will not apologize for following quite a

    different path of scholarship than what is being pursued by Young Conservatives these days, who are the

    intellectual heirs of a staunch tradition to be sure. In the end, will the elite leaders of the state

    do what Cox predicted they would do–cultivate neo-fascist youth–or will they stand up to the boos?

    Mark your calendars for March 11, when the Univ. of Texas Regents have scheduled a

    special meeting during Spring Break whose agenda has yet to be announced.

    Greg

    Moses
    Site Editor