Category: Uncategorized

  • Singing in the Boycott: El Primero de Mayo Lyrics

    We got the song from Roberto Calderon who got it from Jorge Mariscal at UCSD

    El Primero de Mayo

    Coro:
    En el Primero de Mayo
    Dejamos de comprar y trabajar
    Luchamos por Justicia
    Y la Libertad
    En el Primero de Mayo
    Dejamos de comprar y trabajar
    Con todo el mundo entero
    En el Primero de Mayo Compañeras y Compañeros
    Les quiero hablar de una cuestión
    Tan solo un día necesitamos
    Para demostrar nuestra convicción
    Ese día tan especial
    Se nos acerca ya
    Hay que anunciar
    Por todos lados
    Nuestra Solidaridad/Coro:

    Sin papeles o con papeles
    Es la hora de educar
    Que el racismo y leyes malas
    Nos quieren quitar la libertad
    Hay que anunciar por todos lados
    La importancia de organizar
    Toda la familia debe de actuar*Coro

    No somos malos ni criminales
    Venimos aquí pa’ trabajar
    Este país nos necesita y estamos aquí para ayudar

    En este mundo tan complicado
    Que quiere decir ser ilegal
    Hay que aceptar que este mundo esta cambiando

    Y las fronteras se van a eliminar*Coro

    Tenemos, que prepararnos
    Para poder aprovechar este momento
    Hay que hacer, todas las compras
    Antes del día 30 de abril
    Debemos, de tener
    Los alimentos, la gasolina
    Y una veladora

    De nuestra virgen de Guadalupe*Coro

    By Joaquin y Neri McWhinney To hear the song, go to:
    http://calacapress.com/gigantedespierto/mp3/PrimeroDeMayo.mp3

  • May First: Great American Boycott!

    Immigration activists call for nationwide boycott

    April 5, 2006

    By MICHAEL DOYLE McClatchy Newspapers

    WASHINGTON — Immigrant advocates called Tuesday for a nationwide boycott of jobs and schools on May 1, even as senators appeared stymied in their efforts to finish the immigration bill that’s provoking controversy.

    The proposed “Great American Boycott of 2006” is being organized by some of the same activists who rallied an estimated half a million demonstrators in Los Angeles on March 25. Now, in a bid to show nationwide clout, they want immigrants and supporters to avoid work, school, buying and selling on May 1.

    “We realize that we have been absent from the political debate in Washington, although we are the voices of those most affected by the legislation,” Juan Jose Gutierrez, director of Latino Movement USA, said at a Washington news conference.

    The nationwide boycott is also being organized through the ANSWER Coalition, whose member groups range from the Free Palestine Alliance to the Party for Socialism and Liberation and the Korea Truth Coalition.

    The boycott, along with upcoming nationwide rallies scheduled for April 10, represent the loudest aspect of a debate that has meandered on Capitol Hill for the past week. On Tuesday, despite some ongoing Republican compromise negotiations, increasingly irritated senators acknowledged they lack the 60 votes necessary to pass legislation.

    “I’m very frustrated right now,” Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist conceded early Tuesday evening, adding, “We’re making no progress whatsoever.”

    Eight hours of debate Tuesday, interrupted by frequent quorum calls, did not result in any substantive progress and yielded only one, symbolic, vote.

    One hundred amendments still await action, prompting some senators — including Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas — to suggest that the Senate might have to postpone action until after a two-week April recess now scheduled to start Saturday. Throughout most of Tuesday, Democrats used the Senate’s procedural rules to block voting on amendments.

    Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid complained, in turn, about past Republican intransigence on issues like the minimum wage. He insisted Democrats would block amendments that “damage the integrity” of the 478-page bill.

    “We’re still looking to find the magic formula,” Republican Sen. Mel Martinez of Florida allowed Tuesday afternoon.

    Martinez has begun seeking a compromise deal with Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, a potential 2008 presidential candidate. Still a work in progress, their proposal would treat illegal immigrants differently depending on how long they have been in the United States.

    Illegal immigrants who could prove they had lived in this country for at least five years could obtain legal U.S. residency under the newest proposal. Newer immigrants would have to first return, even if briefly, to their home country.

    “We’re not anywhere near a final agreement,” Hagel said, but “I think we’re moving along here.”

    The immigration bill approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee would not differentiate among the estimated 11 million to 12 million illegal immigrants now in the United States. All could seek legal U.S. status good for six years, if they met certain requirements. They would face background checks and pay fines starting at $1,000. Eventually, by paying an additional $1,000, taking a medical exam, paying back taxes and meeting other requirements, they could obtain permanent U.S. residency.

    Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, a chief proponent of the legalization effort, dismissed the latest Republican compromise proposal as one that “doesn’t make a great deal of sense.”

  • TRAC: Scholarly Resource for Immigration Research

    The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) today [April 4, 2006] launched a unique new website providing extensive information about one
    of most important and politically sensitive subjects in America today — immigration control. Go to:

    http://trac.syr.edu/immigration
    Developed with the support of the JEHT Foundation, the Ford Foundation and Syracuse University, the site offers one-stop shopping for a broad array of authoritative information about what is now one of the largest single enforcement and control efforts in the United States.

    The first edition of TRAC’s new site, among other features, includes:

    (1) separate clearly written reports on important immigration matters,

    (2) a special TRAC tool that provides one-click access to the very latest monthly data on criminal enforcement of the immigration laws, along
    with a clear explanatory text,
    (3) an extensive library of immigration reports by the GAO, CRS and inspectors general,

    (4) a plain English glossary of frequently used words and acronyms and much more.

    Some key findings in the initial reports:

    — Long term and regional data raise questions about the assertion that adding Border Patrol agents results in increased apprehensions.

    — Of the millions of inspections of those seeking entry into the United States last year at all of the nation’s hundreds of “designated ports of entry”, less than one tenth of one percent were refused entry.

    — Government staffing data show that the events of 9/11 had only modest impact on the overall size of the Border Patrol and the distribution of its agents around the country.

    Also included on the site is a dedicated area with data about long-term trends and regional variation on such subjects as Border Patrol apprehensions, staffing and criminal enforcement of the immigration laws.
    Other data describe the government’s inspections activities at the designated ports of entry.

    The site is very much a work in progress; a range of additional reports and studies on a variety of different immigration subjects — including the exercise of discretion within the immigration courts — are
    planned. These reports and the latest data obtained from the government will be posted as the information is obtained from the various agencies, checked for accuracy and completeness and analyzed.

    The purpose of the site — developed on the basis of TRAC’s well-tested data collection efforts and expert data analysis skills — is to provide the American people, Congress, immigration groups, reporters and
    others with the authoritative information they need to judge the performance of the government in this critical area.

    David Burnham and Susan B. Long, co-directors


    Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse


    Syracuse University


    488 Newhouse II


    Syracuse, NY 13244-2100


    315-443-3563


    trac@syr.edu


    http://trac.syr.edu

  • Double the Border Guard? Syracuse Study Says Not So Fast

    Broad public concern about the flow of illegal immigrants into the United States has fueled demands in Congress for the approximate doubling in the size of the Border Patrol (BP), from about 11,000 to 21,000 agents.

    Although the BP has grown substantially in the last two decades, the proposed addition of 10,000 new agents in the next five years would be unprecedented. It also would make the BP the largest federal law enforcement agency in the country — much bigger than the FBI and with over four times more agents than the Drug Enforcement Agency, over seven times more agents than the IRS and almost nine times the number working for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. See table below.
    Agency Number of Agents (full-time)

    FBI 12,214

    Border Patrol 11,106
    proposed 21,000

    DEA 4,925

    IRS 2,829

    ATF 2,401

    Such an enhancement would also be expensive. At its present size, the current annual cost of the BP is about $1.7 billion. This would more or less double. The overall cost, however, would not be limited only to the agency. If, for example, the new “get tough” policy was coupled with a decision to fully enforce only the laws that are now on the books for the current number of BP apprehensions, there would necessarily be a dramatic rise in the total workload being handled by the federal criminal court system. At that point, also, the makeup of workload would would dramatically shift, with roughly 10 immigration cases for every current non-immigration prosecution. Such a volume clearly would require a substantial increase in funding for the additional prosecutors, judges, detention beds and support staff needed to process them.

    Given the dimensions of many of the proposals now under consideration — the House has passed new legislation and a Senate Committee is currently holding hearings — the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) has undertaken a special analysis of government data examining how changes in BP staff in the past have affected its principal job: the apprehension of illegal immigrants.

    Curious Outcomes

    For all enforcement agencies — federal, state or local — the common sense rule-of-thumb is that more agents or more police officers result in more official actions — more inspections, more arrests, more apprehensions or whatever. (This is thought to be true because the number of offenses — whether it is people taking illegal drugs or aliens sneaking across the border — typically far exceeds the capacity of law enforcement ever to handle them all.)

    This theory , however, does not appear to hold true for the BP on either a short or long term basis. From FY 1995 to FY 2005, for example, beginning in the Clinton Administration, the number of full-time BP employees more than doubled, jumping from 4,876 to 11,106. But for the whole period, BP apprehensions went the other way, dropping by over 10 percent from 1,324,202 in 1995 to 1,188,977 in the most recent available year.

    An examination of BP records for a much longer time period reinforces the doubts about the direct link between agents and apprehensions. Looked at from 1947, for example, the data show three peaks in the overall number apprehensions — in FY 1954, FY 1986 and FY 2000.

    Surprisingly, the unusually large number of apprehensions the BP reports making in both 1986 and 2000 — about 1.6 million of them — were considerably higher than the 1.2 million recorded in 2004 and 2005, even though the BP now has a lot bigger staff. See Figure 2 and supporting table.

    From the new TRAC website at Syracuse.