Category: Uncategorized

  • San Antonio: Castro, Villareal, Menendez, & LULAC

    A&M ‘legacy’ policy seen related to lack of minorities

    By Matt Flores
    San Antonio Express-News
    Web Posted : 01/08/2004 12:00 AM

    Citing Texas A&M University’s poor record of attracting minority students, legislators Wednesday

    called on the institution to abandon its practice of giving a boost in the admissions process to

    children, grandchildren and siblings of alumni. “You can’t close the door on affirmative action and

    make birthright an entitlement to admission,” state Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-San Antonio, said in a news

    conference.

    He was joined by state Reps. Mike Villarreal and Jose Menéndez, also San

    Antonio Democrats, and members of the League of United Latin American Citizens.

    Simultaneous news conferences were held in Austin and Houston to denounce Texas A&M’s so-called

    “legacy” policy, which has come under growing criticism since the university announced last month it

    wouldn’t use race as a factor in its admissions policy.

    Wednesday’s move was the

    latest among several lawmakers who are pressuring Texas A&M to scrap the legacy policy. State Rep. Lon

    Burnam, D-Fort Worth, already has said he intends to file legislation aimed at ending A&M’s legacy

    program.

    The lawmakers and civil rights activists called on the university to

    reconsider its legacy policy, saying it effectively gives preferences to Anglo students at a time when

    the school is struggling to diversify.

    Last year, Anglos accounted for 82 percent of

    A&M’s student population while Hispanics made up 9 percent. African Americans accounted for 2 percent

    and Asian Americans accounted for 3 percent.

    By comparison, Anglos accounted for 60

    percent of the student body at the University of Texas at Austin — the state’s other public flagship

    institution — while Hispanics made up 14 percent and African Americans accounted for 3 percent. Asian

    Americans made up 17 percent.

    “The legacy program at A&M counters the worthy goal of

    closing the gaps in Texas institutions,” said Villarreal, a 1992 A&M graduate.

    He was

    referring to the state’s “Closing the Gaps” initiative to bring about greater parity in college

    attendance and graduation rates.

    The U.S. Supreme Court last summer cleared the way for

    Texas institutions to resume affirmative action practices, and some in the state, including UT-Austin

    and Rice University, have since announced plans to revamp their admissions policies to include race

    factors.

    Texas A&M is the only public university in the state that gives preferences to

    applicants who are the grandchildren, children or siblings of A&M graduates.

    Although

    in some years A&M gives a boost to as many as 2,000 legacy applicants, university data showed the

    consideration was the difference in admitting 345 new freshmen in 2003.

    Of those

    admitted because of the legacy consideration, 312 were Anglo, 27 were Hispanic and six were African

    American. Only about 300 African Americans were admitted to the university as a whole in

    2003.

    “More students were admitted because Mom or Dad went to A&M than the total

    number of African Americans admitted,” said Gary Bledsoe, state president of the National Association

    for the Advancement of Colored People, who spoke at the news conference in Austin.

    “The Texas A&M legacy program is inherently discriminatory toward minorities — and based on

    nothing even resembling merit,” Bledsoe added.

    Texas A&M officials didn’t respond to

    interview requests, but in defending A&M’s position, school officials have said that legacy

    considerations don’t guarantee admission and have noted that minority legacies are admitted at about

    the same rate as Anglo legacies.

    Late Wednesday, A&M President Robert Gates issued this

    statement:

    “As I indicated several weeks ago when I met with concerned legislators,

    the admissions process has been under review and will continue to be evaluated to ensure that it

    achieves one of the university’s primary objectives — that of having a student body that is more

    representative of the state of Texas.”

    And the university’s true problem in

    diversifying its student body, officials say, lies with persuading prospective students to enroll, not

    in admitting them. Fewer than half of Hispanic and African American students who are admitted to A&M

    each year actually enroll.

    Instead of concentrating on an affirmative action admissions

    policy, Gates has embarked on efforts to award more scholarships to needy, first-generation college

    students and to intensify outreach efforts in urban areas. Last summer, the school opened a center in

    HemisFair Plaza to facilitate applications for admissions, housing and financial aid.

    But Villarreal said he would give the university an “F” thus far in addressing minority

    enrollment.

    “They may be great efforts, but they are going to be judged on how their

    minority numbers improve,” he said. “What really matters is who attends and who eventually walks

    across the stage.”

  • Ellis, Barrientos, Dukes, Bledsoe, Harrington, & Others Call for Fairness at

    Jan. 7, 2004
    Press Release
    From the

    Office of State Senator Rodney Ellis
    State Officials, Civil Rights Advocates
    Call on

    Texas A&M to Correct Admissions Policies

    Austin, TX// Senators Rodney Ellis and Gonzalo

    Barrientos were joined by State Representative Dawnna Dukes the NAACP, LULAC, MALDEF, and the Texas

    Civil Rights project for a press conference on Wednesday focusing attention on the admissions situation

    at Texas A&M University. The Houston Chronicle recently reported that Texas A&M, while refusing to

    take race into consideration as an admission criterion, has the most active legacy admission program in

    Texas.

    “To continue the Legacy Program at A&M while removing race as a consideration

    for admission, in my mind, further erodes the image of this fine institution at a time that it needs to

    do more to attract minority students,” said Senator Gonzalo Barrientos.

    Similar press

    conferences with elected officials and civil rights advocates took place simultaneously in Houston and

    San Antonio as well. Participants in the press conferences highlighted the discrepancy in minority vs

    Anglo enrollment at Texas A&M as well as the gap in minority vs legacy

    enrollment.

    “More students were admitted because mom or dad went to A&M, than the total

    number of African Americans admitted,” said NAACP President Gary Bledsoe. “The Texas A&M legacy

    program is inherently discriminatory towards minorities, and based on nothing even resembling

    merit.”

    Texas A&M admitted 358 students last year through the legacy program. Of those,

    only six were African American and 27 Hispanic.

    Legacy admissions programs don’t just

    hurt minorities seeking an education,” explained Senator Ellis, “this program is even bad for white

    kids whose parents aren’t Aggies.”

    All three press conferences in Texas focused on a

    single theme: Texas A&M must change its admissions policies if it truly wishes to correct its minority

    gap.

    “As an alumnus of Texas A&M, I am truly disappointed that the University has

    chosen to create an admissions policy that is contradictory to their stated goal of seeking to improve

    minority admissions,” said Representative Dawnna Dukes. “Establishing scholarships for first

    generation disadvantaged minority students, while giving preference to second and third generation

    advantaged students is contradictory to an even-handed policy. An aggressive attempt to recruit

    historically disadvantaged applicants is not achieved by giving historically advantaged applicants a

    leg up. Such an admission policy cannot possibly increase minority student

    enrollment.”

  • Chertoff Rebuffs Congress, Too, Says Border Businesswoman

    McAllen business leader Monica Weisberg-Stewart said it’s no surprise that Americans are confused as to what documents they will need to re-enter the United States from land ports come Jan. 31.

    “That’s because the Department of Homeland Security has decided to ignore instructions from Congress to postpone the Western Hemisphere Initiative to June 2009,” said Weisberg-Stewart. “WHTI would have required Americans to use a passport to re-enter the U.S. at land ports. Homeland Security opposes the delay and has decided if they can’t require passports, they’ll require birth certificates instead.”

    Full Story: Rio Grande Guardian

  • Johnson-Castro: Dispatch on Border Wall Resistance

    DEL RIO, TX (Januar 7, 2007) Afternoon Border Ambassadors, Freedom Ambassadors, friends and allies…

    Attached are three documents.

    12/7/7 Transcript of Chertoff addressing his threatening letter to property owners on the Texas-Mexico border [chertoff.pdf]

    12/7/7 Chertoff threat of eminent domain to Eloisa Tamez [eloisa1.pdf]

    1/7/8 Legal notice to Chertoff from Attorney Peter Schey [schey.pdf]

    Everyone knows that the US Government has long formed and supported puppet governments all over the world. Unfortunately, in the process, the US has often propped up cruel dictators that wielded unrestrained tyrannical power over their own people…from China to the Middle East, from the South Pacific to all over the Americas. It seems to go with the territory of being a world power…and now a global power. It doesn’t seem to bother every day Americans very much…just as long as the local economy is comfortable and we have plenty of malls, box stores and buffets. So, what does that say about the moral values of our government, let alone “we the people”?

    Since the beginning of this decade, the 21st century, this millennium…the worm has turned. We have seen our own government turn on its own people like a cannibalistic rabid dog chewing on its own leg. What is happening is incomprehensible…but we shouldn’t be shocked. We have been heading in that “what you sow you reap” direction for a long time now. What more proof do we need than to look at the Department of Homeland Security.

    The current Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security is unquestionably one more puppet government…but this time with domestic dictatorial powers. Dictatorial powers over “we the people” of the United States. As an acid test, let’s just ask ourselves…”How many Americans presume that their phone is tapped and that their e-mail intercepted?”

    Just thirty days ago today, on December 7, 2007, Michael Chertoff sent out a threatening letter to American citizens who reside on the Texas border with Mexico, as well as to organizations like the University of Texas-Brownsville, folks who have exercised their rights and have refused to allow federal access to their private lands that the proposed border wall would cut through. If the property owner has not allow access, in his letter, Chertoff promises swift action against them, threatening to not forced entry to their land, but to confiscate it…seize it. A letter to one such recipient, Eloisa Tamez, a Native American, is attached. Today is the the deadline for all such recipients of that threatening letter , as Eloisa, to acquiesce to Chertoff…or else!

    Also attached is the transcript of Chertoff’s December 7, 2007 press conference on that same day in which he address that December 7th threat to border property owners. I have taken the liberty of highlighting many of his select rhetoric. Any Texan, any American…any person who has any sense of liberty…should be appalled at such dictatorial arrogance.

    When one looks at his ridicule of the Texas border residents with his “not in my backyard” accusations, his threatening rhetoric of eminent domain, all the way to the sending in of Blackhawks, one has to agree that we don’t need a dictator to be shaping the future of our country with unilateral and undemocratic, un-American and immoral decisions. In his 12/7/7 press conference, he clearly shows how he is using gradualism to heavily militarize the entire border, doubling the forces and “going to the next level”. He already acknowledges that not only the ACLU is his adversary, but the Chambers of Commerce as well.

    There is a rapidly growing coalition of Americans that is standing up to this dictatorial regime. The third attachment is the letter that is being sent today, January 7, 2008, to Sec. of DHS, Chertoff. It is being submitted by Peter Schey of the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, in behalf of Eloisa Tamez, sending a volley back to Chertoff that his dictatorial powers have no legitimate standing in this country.

    In a totally legal, democratic and peaceful way, this growing coalition has been saying “Hell No!. You will not build a wall of apartheid on American soil…let alone here in Texas”. In a historic stand of solidarity, this alliance has been forming that represents a vast number of facets of America…with the exception of the ruling elite, the racist supremacists and the xenophobic. Our alliance crosses all barriers. We have the environmentalists, the faith based groups, the economists, the elected officials…from mayoral to Congressional, the law enforcement, the indigenous, the academic, the youth, veterans and every day grass roots Texans and Americans. Even the media. As Americans, we are standing tall against this domestic puppet dictatorship.

    If you or your organization would like join in this growing coalition to oppose the construction of a Berlin-like wall and the militarization of our borderlands, please let us know.

    Please feel free to post, share and circulate this information.

    In solidarity…

    Jay J. Johnson-Castro, Sr.

    jay@villadelrio.com