Author: mopress

  • Escort them to their Leader: The Haitian Refugee Blockade of '04

    These days we’re exploring models of borderland security, which is what makes the Haitian Turnback of ’04 so interesting. In this model, superpower X in its relations with country Y is able to organize a kidnapping of the president, provoke violent seizure of power, and turn back every single refugee who tries to run for his or her life. The refugee blockade piece is handled by the director of Homeland Security, although it does require him to pull an all-nighter.

    Here’s the clip from govexec.com: Able Sentry

    By Jason Peckenpaugh
    jpeckenpaugh@govexec.com

    The Coast Guard helps prevent a mass migration from Haiti.

    In early February, Haitian rebels began threatening the government of then-president Jean-Bertrand Aristide. On Feb. 21, as the unrest spread, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge went to the White House with a plan to prevent what officials feared most: a wave of Haitian emigrants sailing for U.S. shores.

    The ink was still wet on Ridge’s plan, finished at 5:19 that morning by department officials in Miami who pulled an all-nighter. It called for an armada of Coast Guard cutters, Border Patrol helicopters, and aircraft from the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to patrol the coast of Haiti for boats full of emigrants. They would be stopped and repatriated to Haiti.

    The plan worked, even as Aristide’s government collapsed. With round-the-clock patrols and repeated calls for Haitians to stay put – a message emphasized by President Bush, among others – a mass migration never materialized. Homeland Security repatriated all 905 Haitians who had set sail for Florida as of March 11.

    In the public imagination, the effort was largely a Coast Guard operation. The service provided most of the resources, enlisting 15 cutters and 1,550 personnel, and did the physical work of returning Haitians to their country. But Ridge’s plan, known as Operation Able Sentry, called for five other DHS agencies to pony up personnel. Seven Florida law enforcement agencies also participated. To coordinate them, DHS unveiled a command structure that officials see as a model for managing future homeland security events.

    The Haitian operation was run by Homeland Security Task Force Southeast, which counts members from all DHS agencies in Florida. Established by Ridge last June, the task force quickly realized that every agency entering the new department had its own procedures for responding to migration incidents. After months of work, officials merged these plans into a 3-inch-thick document that became the playbook for the Haitian crisis.

    To lead the task force, Ridge’s office tapped Coast Guard Rear Adm. Harvey Johnson, and named the Border Patrol’s Lynne Underdown as his deputy. Both have day jobs: Johnson runs Coast Guard operations for District 7, which covers the Caribbean, while Underdown heads Border Patrol efforts in Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas. But as task force leaders, they answered to Homeland Security headquarters in Washington, giving Ridge a direct line to officials in the field. “Within three minutes of the first Haitian being repatriated, they knew about it in Washington,” says Johnson.

    Once the task force got up and running, Underdown asked DHS agency chiefs in Miami to ante up the resources called for in their migration plan. In quick succession, she had access to 12 aircraft from ICE, planning specialists from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and public affairs officials from the Transportation Security Administration. ICE detention and removal officials readied plans in case Haitians made it to U.S. shores, while the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) put 17 asylum pre-screening officers on Coast Guard cutters, to determine whether any Haitians qualified for asylum.

    These assets essentially belonged to the task force for the duration of the incident; Johnson and Underdown could deploy them as they saw fit. But they were careful to keep DHS agency chiefs in the loop. “We weren’t giving orders to their people without coordinating through them,” says Underdown. “The task force [chain of] command was parallel to the normal agency chain of command.”

    Johnson’s staff drew up a joint patrol schedule for DHS and Florida agency aircraft to take turns patrolling key areas. “The Border Patrol would say we can patrol an area off West Palm Beach from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.; then the Florida Wildlife Commission would do it until midnight, and ICE would take it after that,” says Underdown.

    Closer to Haiti, Coast Guard cutters were continually reacting to events in Port-au-Prince, the nation’s capital. On a single day, Johnson says the service nabbed about 500 emigrants, who took to the seas at Aristide’s urging, they believe. “It was very dynamic whether Aristide would come or go,” says Johnson. “It was not unusual for us to get real-time intelligence out of that theater every 15 minutes,” adds Underdown.

    On Feb. 25, the task force scrambled to intercept the Margot, a Panamanian-registered freighter that had issued a distress call just 10 miles off the Florida coast. Teams from ICE, the FBI and the Coast Guard descended on the vessel, finding 17 Haitians and some weapons on board.

    Because the Haitian emigrants were intercepted at sea, the task force never resorted to contingency plans for processing and returning Haitians who made landfall in the United States. On March 11, Ridge directed the task force to cease its Haitian operations, although the Coast Guard continues to watch for signs of a migration should security in that country worsen.

    In Washington, officials view the Haitian task force as a model for how the department should manage joint operations in the field. Later this year, the department plans to create regional offices in an effort to unify the field structure of its 22 agencies. At a March 24 hearing of two House Government Reform subcommittees, Asa Hutchinson, Homeland Security’s undersecretary for Border and Transportation Security, cited the Haitian task force as an example of the role these offices will play. Regional directors will manage temporary events and will be Ridge’s direct liaisons on certain occasions, but they will not oversee daily operations. “The day-to-day operational control would still be through the traditional agencies,” Hutchinson said after the hearing.

    For Homeland Security officials in the field, Operation Able Sentry was largely a success. Underdown tells a story of four Cuban emigrants who were intercepted outside New Orleans, near the mouth of the Mississippi river. The emigrants wanted to sail for Miami, but the smuggler they paid declined. “He said DHS was all over Miami, so he took them all the way up to the Mississippi river instead,” says Underdown.

  • NACC Reading Room: CFR Task Force 2005

    Task Force Urges Measures to Strengthen North American Competitiveness, Expand Trade, Ensure Border Security

    May 17, 2005
    Council on Foreign Relations

    May 17, 2005–North America is vulnerable on several fronts: the region faces terrorist and criminal security threats, increased economic competition from abroad, and uneven economic development at home. In response to these challenges, a trinational, Independent Task Force on the Future of North America has developed a roadmap to promote North American security and advance the well-being of citizens of all three countries. When the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States met in Texas recently they underscored the deep ties and shared principles of the three countries. The Council-sponsored Task Force applauds the announced “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” but proposes a more ambitious vision of a new community by 2010 and specific recommendations on how to achieve it.

    Pointing to increased competition from the European Uni*n and rising economic powers such as India and China in the eleven years since NAFTA took effect, co-chair Pedro C. Aspe, former Finance Minister of Mexico, said, “We need a vision for North America to address the new challenges.” The Task Force establishes a blueprint for a powerhouse North American trading area that allows for the seamless movement of goods, increased labor mobility, and energy security.

    “We are asking the leaders of the United States, Mexico, and Canada to be bold and adopt a vision of the future that is bigger than, and beyond, the immediate problems of the present,” said co-chair John P. Manley, Former Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance. “They could be the architects of a new community of North America, not mere custodians of the status quo.”

    At a time of political transition in Canada and Mexico, the Task Force proposes new ideas to cope with continental challenges that should be the focus of debate in those two countries as well as the United States. To ensure a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America, the Task Force proposes a number of specific measures:

    Make North America safer:

    * Establish a common security perimeter by 2010.

    * Develop a North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers.

    * Develop a unified border action plan and expand border customs facilities.

    Create a single economic space:

    * Adopt a common external tariff.

    * Allow for the seamless movement of goods within North America.

    * Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the U.S.

    * Develop a North American energy strategy that gives greater emphasis to reducing emissions of greenhouse gases — a regional alternative to Kyoto.

    * Review those sectors of NAFTA that were excluded.

    * Develop and implement a North American regulatory plan that would include “open skies and open roads” and a unified approach for protecting consumers on food, health, and the environment.

    * Expand temporary worker programs and create a “North American preference” for immigration for citizens of North America.

    Spread benefits more evenly:

    * Establish a North American Investment Fund to build infrastructure to connect Mexico’s poorer regions in the south to the market to the north.

    * Restructure and reform Mexico’s public finances.

    * Fully develop Mexican energy resources to make greater use of international technology and capital.

    Institutionalize the partnership:

    * Establish a permanent tribunal for trade and investment disputes.

    * Convene an annual North American summit meeting.

    * Establish a Tri-national Competition Commission to develop a common approach to trade remedies.

    * Expand scholarships to study in the three countries and develop a network of Centers for North American Studies.

    Co-chair William F. Weld, former Governor of Massachusetts and U.S. Assistant Attorney General, said, “We are three liberal democracies; we are adjacent; we are already intertwined economically; we have a great deal in common historically; culturally, we have a lot to learn from one another.”

    Organized in association with the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales and the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, the Task Force includes prominent former officials, businessmen, and academic experts from all three countries. A Chairmen’s Statement was released in March in advance of the trinational summit; the full report represents the consensus of the entire Task Force membership and leadership.

    Chief Executive of the Canadian Council of Chief ExecutivesThomas d’Aquino, President of the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales Andrés Rozental, and Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University Robert A. Pastor serve as vice chairs.Chappell H. Lawson, Associate Professor of political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is director.

    Building a North American Community: Report of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America is available on the Council website.

    Founded in 1921, theCouncil on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments.

    The Mexican Council on Foreign Relations(COMEXI) is the only multi-disciplinary organization committed to fostering sophisticated, broadly inclusive political discourse and analysis on the nature of Mexico’s participation in the international arena and the relative influence of Mexico’s increasingly global orientation on domestic priorities. The Council is an independent, non-profit, pluralistic forum, with no government or institutional ties that is financed exclusively by membership dues and corporate support. The main objectives of COMEXI are to provide information and analysis of interest to our associates, as well as to create a solid institutional framework for the exchange of ideas concerning pressing world issues that affect our country.

    Founded in 1976, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives is Canada’s premier business association, with an outstanding record of achievement in matching entrepreneurial initiative with sound public policy choices. A not-for-profit, non-partisan organization composed of the chief executives of 150 leading Canadian enterprises, the CCCE was the Canadian private sector leader in the development and promotion of the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement during the 1980s and of the subsequent trilateral North American Free Trade Agreement.

    Members of the Independent Task Force on North America

    Minister Pedro Aspe
    (Mexican co-chair)
    Protego

    Mr. Thomas S. Axworthy
    Queen’s University

    Ms. Heidi S. Cruz
    Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

    Mr. Nelson W. Cunningham
    Kissinger McLarty Associates

    Mr. Thomas P. d’Aquino
    (Canadian co-vice chair)
    Canadian Council of Chief Executives

    Mr. Alfonso de Angoitia
    Grupo Televisa, S.A.

    Dr. Luis de La Calle Pardo
    De la Calle, Madrazo, Mancera, S.C.

    Professor Wendy K. Dobson
    University of Toronto

    Dr. Robert A. Pastor (U.S. co-vice chair)
    American University

    Mr. Andrés Rozental
    (Mexican co-vice chair)
    Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales

    Dr. Richard A. Falkenrath
    The
    Bro
    okings Institution

    Dr. Rafael Fernandez de Castro
    Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México

    Mr. Ramón Alberto Garza
    Montemedia

    The Honorable Gordon D. Giffin
    McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP

    Mr. Allan Gotlieb
    Donner Canadian Foundation

    Mr. Michael Hart
    Norman Paterson School of International Affairs

    Mr. Carlos Heredia
    Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales

    The Honorable Carla A. Hills
    Hills & Company

    Dr. Gary C. Hufbauer
    Institute for International Economics

    Dr. Luis Rubio
    CIDAC

    Dr. Jeffrey J. Schott
    Institute for International Economics

    Mr. Pierre Marc Johnson
    Heenan Blaikie

    The Honorable James R. Jones
    Manatt Jones Global Strategies

    Dr. Chappell H. Lawson (Task Force Director)
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    The Honourable John P. Manley (Canadian co-chair)
    McCarthy Tetrault

    Mr. David McD. Mann
    Cox Hanson O’Reilly Matheson

    Ms. Doris M. Meissner
    Migration Policy Institute

    The Honorable Thomas M.T. Niles
    Institute for International Economics

    The Honorable William F. Weld (U.S. co-chair)
    Leeds Weld & Co.

    Mr. Raul H. Yzaguirre
    Arizona State University Includes key players of the April 2005 CNAC report from MEXUS such as Mr. Nelson W. Cunningham of Kissinger McLarty Associates and James R. Jones of Mannatt Jones. Source.

  • Highly Centralized Border Command Proposed (March 2005)

    Tactics and Technology

    The following represents the tactical and technological approaches, under the direction of the CBP Commissioner and Chief of the Border Patrol, that the Border Patrol will pursue in addressing this Strategy’s objectives: a more flexible, welltrained, nationally-directed Border Patrol; specialized teams and rapid-response capabilities; intelligence-driven operations; and infrastructure, facility, and
    technology support.

    Approach 1

    A more flexible, well-trained, nationally directed
    Border Patrol
    The Border Patrol will use a highly centralized organizational model with a direct chain of command from the CBP Commissioner, to the Chief of the Border Patrol, to the Sector Chief Patrol Agents. This national command structure will facilitate national determinations on threat and resource priorities and will allow for the rapid deployment of Border Patrol assets, both on a short-term, temporary basis, as well as on long-term or permanent operations. This nationally directed mobility, with supporting national policies, will allow the Border Patrol to rapidly respond to emerging threats and hot spots along the border in a proactive prevention and response capacity. This type of flexibility is critical to address the present terrorist threat.

    Anti-terrorism training is critical to ensuring that Border Patrol agents are fully prepared to address the terrorism threat. In conjunction with the Office of Training and Development, the Border Patrol will continually assess its anti-terrorism training requirements to ensure that agents, supervisors, and managers have the necessary multi-disciplinary training to effectively carry out the Border Patrol’s priority anti-terrorism mission. The Office of Training and Development will work with the Border Patrol to ensure this training is developed and delivered in the most effective and operationally efficient manner, using methods such as computer-based modules, mobile training teams, train-the-trainer instruction, classroom and Academy training.

    The Border Patrol will continue to deploy assets to interior U.S. locations where there is a direct nexus to
    border control operations, such as at transportation hubs, airports, and bus stations to confront routes of
    egress for terrorists, smugglers, and illegal aliens, and to support ICE-led interior efforts when appropriately coordinated and approved at the national level.

    Approach 2

    Specialized teams and rapid-response capabilities

    CBP will expand the training and response capabilities of the Border Patrol’s specialized BORTAC, BORSTAR,
    and Special Response teams to support domestic and international intelligence-driven and anti-terrorism
    efforts as well as other special operations. These teams will assist in terrorism prevention through
    planning, training, and tactical deployment. As a highly mobile, rapid-response tool, they will significantly increase CBP’s ability to respond operationally to specific terrorist threats and incidents, as well as to support the traditional Border Patrol mission.

    Approach 3

    Intelligence-driven operations

    The Border Patrol will expand the use of national security and terrorist-related intelligence and targeting information to improve intelligence-driven operations. This will enable the Border Patrol to deploy its resources effectively to target areas of greatest risk. These operations will be coordinated with the Office of Field Operations to ensure maximum effectiveness at and between the ports of entry. In order to support tactical and strategic operations, the Border Patrol will enhance its own organic intelligence program by coordinating with CBP’s Office of Intelligence. In addition, the Border Patrol will leverage the intelligence capabilities of the Offices of Intelligence, Field Operations, and Anti-Terrorism to increase threat assessment, targeting efforts, operational planning, and communication to support its anti-terrorism and traditional missions.

    Approach 4

    Infrastructure, facility, and technology support
    Integrating increased numbers of agents and new technology into the Border Patrol’s enforcement activities has strained resources previously dedicated to infrastructure, facility, and technology support. To ensure the objectives of this Strategy are not negatively impacted by a degradation of its infrastructure, the Border Patrol will continue to assess and address critical needs for this support, which include new construction; the preservation of buildings, technology, vehicles, and fences; and the deployment and maintenance of new technologies, ranging from remote cameras to computer and intelligence systems. This support is critical
    to ensuring that the investment made in new agents and new technology maintains its effectiveness in
    the face of shifting patterns of border threat and changing criminal tactics. Source

  • NACC Archive: From the State Dept USA

    North American Competitiveness Council Promotes Regional Growth

    Regional officials also review progress on Security and Prosperity Partnership

    Washington — U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, Mexican Economy Minister Sergio Garcia de Alba and Canadian Minister of Industry Maxime Bernier joined North American business leaders to launch the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) June 15 in Washington. In March, U.S. President Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Vicente Fox announced the creation of the NACC as part of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) initiative. The NACC officially was launched June 15 and will be made up of 10 high-level business leaders from each country, who will meet annually with senior North American government officials to provide recommendations and help set priorities for promoting regional competitiveness in the global economy.

    At the NACC launch, Gutierrez welcomed the contributions of the North American private sector.

    “Today is a continuation of President Bush’s strong commitment to our North American partners to focus on North America’s security and prosperity,” he said. “The private sector is the driving force behind innovation and growth, and the private sector’s involvement in the SPP is key to enhancing North America’s competitive position in global markets.”

    In a June 15 interview with the Washington File, Luis Pinto, executive director of the North American Business Committee at the Council of the Americas and participant in the U.S. Council of the NACC, echoed Gutierrez on the important role of the region’s business community.

    “Success in the 21st century demands regional strategies,” Pinto said, “The leaders understand that the role of government is to create the environment for success, but the private sector is the engine of growth.”

    Pinto added that as part of the secretariat of the U.S. section of the NACC, the Council of the Americas looks forward to working with representatives from the private and public sectors of Canada and Mexico to advance the SPP agenda.

    At the NACC launch, North American government officials and business leaders committed to work together more closely to advance regional competitiveness. The Washington meeting of Gutierrez, Garcia de Alba and Bernier — the SPP prosperity ministers — also provided the officials with an opportunity to reflect on progress in expanding prosperity since the establishment of SPP in 2005.

    Among the accomplishments was the first convocation of officials from the regulatory, trade and oversight agencies from the three North American countries to identify a core set of elements for a Regulatory Cooperation Framework. Other progress included the ongoing liberalization of rules of origin, which helps reduce cost and facilitate cross-border trade and the establishment of a North American task force to combat counterfeiting and piracy, according to a Department of Commerce press release.

    While the SPP ministers reflected on these accomplishments, SPP security ministers –Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Canadian Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day and Mexican Secretary of Government Carlos Abascal — also are taking stock of progress on the security component of the SPP and will release a report in July.

    In the fall, the SPP ministers will hold a meeting with the NACC to discuss priorities, update work plans and consider new initiatives, according to the Commerce Department.

    For more information, see Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

    A press release on SPP accomplishments is available on the Department of Commerce Web site.

    (Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)