Author: mopress

  • Roundup: Texas Civil Rights Issues on the 'Net

    North Texas IndyMedia features a compelling blog by the sister of a jailed Dallas man who, she argues, has been falsely charged in the beating death of an elderly man. Be sure to view the video.

    Texas has scheduled an execution Thursday (28 July) at 6pm for David Martinez. The National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (NCADP) argues that life circumstances should be more carefully considered:

    Like many on death row, Martinez comes from a troubled background. His
    attorneys said that he moved from Texas to Iowa and back to Texas,
    living with one parent or the other. While Martinez lived in Austin
    during his early to mid-teens, his father was “heavily involved” in
    making sadomasochistic paraphernalia. For some time before his arrest,
    Martinez lived on the street. In his case file, a March 1997 form from
    the Salvation Army lists him as homeless.

    The Austin American-Statesman on July 27 features a story by Chuck Lindell about a last-minute appeal by Martinez:

    The last-gasp appeal accuses prosecutors of failing to
    adequately investigate allegations that Martinez, now 29, was sexually
    abused as a teenager by his father and his father’s boyfriend,
    practitioners of a sadomasochistic lifestyle who — until recently —
    eluded defense investigators while "living a kind of underground life,"
    the appeal states.

    Only recently was the father located.  At issue is the need to
    take abuse into consideration when deciding for life or death. 
    Prosecutors (and the Fifth Circuit) have argued that the question of
    sex abuse was raised too late in the process.  Defense attorney
    Gary Taylor is quoted in the last paragraph of the story saying: "At
    some point, whether they choose this case or not, (appellate courts)
    are going to have to address this issue where the district attorney is
    the caretaker of justice — where if the DA takes one action, he may be
    prosecuting a wrong but may be hurting his case in another area."

    Below the break is a roundup of civil rights in the Texas Blogosphere.
    Dos Centavos links up resources for a proposed DREAM act, to enable long-time immigrant students their just opportunity to complete citizenship.


    Brains and Eggs
    says ‘bullshit‘ to the Roberts nomination.


    La Bloguerra
    links to reports that low income housing has been redlined from ‘Northside’ San Antonio neighborhoods.


    Latinos for Texas
    link to a Houston janitors
    strike, "to protest illegal threats by the nation’s largest cleaning
    company, ABM, against workers trying to secure better jobs and
    affordable health care." Average wage: $5.25 per hour, no
    benefits.


    Off the Kuff
    keeps tabs on jail conditions in Harris County.

    Politico says what nobody else dares to say about the frazzled Democratic coaltition. (I read a couple of Demo lists where and Politico is evaded, invisible.)

    Texas Ed Equity picks up a San Antonio Express-News report that a parents‘ revolution is brewing over the education scandal. Hint: keep your eye on Carolyn Boyle.

    The Red State again, from SAE-N, links the story about Texas ranking first (or last, depending which end is up) in uninsured children.

  • New bracero program is not the answer

    PRESS RELEASE FROM THE UFW

    Today, July 26, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee is holding a
    hearing on proposals for comprehensive immigration reform. The voices
    of hardworking immigrants living in the shadows of our society need to
    be heard.

    Our broken immigration system needs fixing. But as the immigration
    debate continues, we must let lawmakers and President Bush know we will
    not accept harsh and unrealistic proposals.

    One such plan is the "Comprehensive Enforcement and Immigration
    Reform Act" introduced last week by Sens. John Cornyn (R-Tx.) and Jon
    Kyl (R-Az.). This bill would create a new unlimited guestworker program
    with no chance for workers to earn the right to stay in the country. It
    would also require that undocumented immigrants already working and
    living here leave after five years of the law’s enactment. This bill
    would further separate families and divide our country.

    We need real, bipartisan and comprehensive solutions that include the
    following principles: A path to hard-earned legalization for
    undocumented immigrants already contributing to this country;
    reunification of families; and protections for workers in this nation.

    The AgJobs bill (S. 359, H.R. 884) sponsored by the United Farm
    Workers has all of these components. It would allow undocumented farm
    workers to earn the right to permanently stay in this country by
    continuing to work in agriculture. With broad bipartisan support, it is
    a comprehensive bill negotiated by the UFW and the nation’s
    agricultural industry. It is the only viable bipartisan immigration
    reform solution for the agricultural industry.

    Contact President Bush and your congressmembers today. Let them
    know measures such as the Cornyn-Kyl bill are harmful to this country.
    Tell them they should enact AgJobs and other bi-partisan comprehensive
    immigration reform bills that include our principles.

    See Action Page at UFW

  • Real Life Hero of Hotel Rwanda Coming in Oct. 2005

    The Texas Civil Rights Project just announced
    that this year’s banquet speaker will be the real life hero of Hotel
    Rwanda, Paul Rusesabagina, who transformed his hotel into life-saving
    shelter during an infamous season of genocide.

  • Are There No Prisons!

    Or (to mix our literary allusions) as Thoreau very nearly said:

    Practically speaking, the opponents to education reform in Texas are not a
    couple hundred politicians in Austin, but a hundred thousand merchants
    and farmers in the rest of the state, who are more interested in
    commerce and agriculture than they are in humanity, and are not
    prepared to do justice to children or their education, cost what it may. I quarrell not with elected foes, but with those who elect them, who
    co-operate with them and do their bidding, the voters, without whom the
    elected suits would be harmless, perhaps even willing to appear able.

    Would you re-elect a representative, senator, lieutenant governor, or
    governor who helped to pass a state income tax for education? Yes or
    No?  See poll at home page, because after a while, we have to ask
    if WE are ready to help solve this problem.  Can’t blame the lege
    if nobody’s votin’ on THIS question.

    Note: The first ‘yes’ vote comes from the
    editor. In the past 48 hours the poll has gone from a Lone Star state,
    to a Texas two-step, and now look! There’s a crowd! Three (count em)
    Texans on
    record.  At this rate, we reach a quorum for justice in some
    future millennium yet to be calendared.  Hang in there, children
    of Texas, if we won’t fund the schools, we’ll damn sure build the
    prisons!