Category: Uncategorized

  • PDF File of PODER Complaint against Austin Police Posted

    On Nov. 7, East Austin activist group PODER (People Organized in the
    Defense of Earth and her Resources) filed a complaint with the USA Dept.
    of Justice, asking for a Civil Rights investigation of the Austin Police,
    because of a pattern of excessive force against peoples of color,
    including 13 killings of unarmed subjects in seven years’ time.

    See the 11-page complaint here or at Downloads under PODER.–gm

  • Chief Orders Evidence Removed from Austin Police Custody

    Austin Police Chief Stan Knee requested that blood and urine
    samples be seized by the district attorney for ‘safe keeping’ after a
    second round of tests from a slain police suspect contradicted last
    month’s findings that the 18-year-old was drug free the night he was shot in the back and killed.

    "The Austin Police Department is disturbed by the inconsistent
    findings," said a statement posted at the police department web
    site. The statement does not say which drugs were found or in
    what amounts.

    "Immediately upon being notified of the results, I contacted the
    District Attorney’s Office and urged them to seize the blood and urine
    evidence and send it to a third party laboratory for analyses," said
    the statement from the Chief. "They have agreed to do this. We have
    also notified the Federal Bureau of Investigations of this event."

    One television station reported that "suspicions were confirmed" when
    the second test was reported, but which suspicions were
    confirmed? Suspicions that the victim was involved with
    drugs? Suspicions that the truth of the incident may never be
    known? Suspicions concerning the pattern of police irregularities
    in this case?

    "Since this case remains under investigation by both the Travis County
    Grand Jury and the U.S. Department of Justice, our ability to comment
    is limited," concluded the statement from Knee.

    For more on the incident, see Dove Springs Speaks about Rocha in our archives of June 2005.

  • TULA Speaks: 'The Beauty of it All'

    We are T.U.L.A.-TEXAS UNITED LATINO ARTISTS.

    In the year of our Lord-2005-September 17-Saturday We set out to celebrate our 6th Annual Mexican Independence Day Parade and Festival at the Texas State Capitol- fulfilling the promise of our Slogans-T.U.L.A.

    Utilizing the Universal Language of Art For The Promotion Of Peace and A Better Understanding Between Us All. Seeking the Path to Equality we discovered that the means through the eyes of a Child.

    On a bus ride down Congress Ave. I witnessed children of different nationalities discuss a drawing one of them had composed. We realized that the Arts community has been traditionally and historically less prone to racial, sexual, ethnic divisions than those imposed on us by society. Our second slogan-T.U.L.A – In The Spirit OF Diversity- Un Nuevo Amanecer. A New Dawn with more compassion for each other. By the mere fact that we celebrate this historic day at The Texas State Capitol demonstrates that we have all evolved. Art has been responsible for this evolution. While it is in fact a historical date we also celebrate the strength of the Human spirit, which involves all of us. T.U.L.A. is an inclusive organization.

    People of all walks of life are Welcomed to participate. Within this premises we claim the Right to Self Determination. For we live in a Democratic Society. Simply Put -We Must Paint Our Own Rainbow. No one will come to save or lobby for us, but us.

    In the historical context we are faced with a dilemma. A vibe which is deeply engrained in the equation of thought here in this Country. ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL. This is fine and dandy but it excludes first of all Women and people of Color. This is Racism, and horrible sins have been committed against us because of it.

    As a result we are invisible in the civil human rights game. Human Rights activist can sin against us and still retain their Activist aura, as was the case when Alex Jones lead the minutemen charge against the parade.

    Still, Once again we see this ancient demon raise its ugly head in the form of the minutemen. Twenty-seven years ago we saw the same character in their racist campaign. The slogans were the same. The same hatred that we saw as the minutemen that attacked our parade. The difference was that they were called the KKK.

    The behavior of the minutemen was pathetic, offensive, a throw back to 1930. Shouts of wetback, go back to Mexico were the mildest insults directed at us. With out a conscience they offended us, not considering we had children in the Parade.

    Equally inconsiderate were the Anglo "radicals" with their "in your face "Confrontation of the minute men which further aggravated the situation. We don’t need anyone to protect us. The irony is that they all missed the beauty of it all.

    I wish to commend our Brothers and Sisters in their Beautiful Motorcycles, customized cars and their floats for showing restrain. In strength, the minutemen were no match for us. We are a Brave Proud People, Proud as an Eagle and we refuse to live in Fear.

    So what do we want is a constant question. Folks, we want everything that a society that we have helped build has to offer. In this city we are 40% of the population and the major work force. We work hard to make the Dream possible. For everyone. We love our country, our children, our parents, our neighbors. And we forgive those who have exploited and oppressed us.

    There are more pressing needs in this country than the hatred the minutemen demonstrate. We invite all good People to come and share a day of peace and the beauty of our Art, our Culture and our Friendship. We are good Friends. And to those who are infuriated by our quest for Equality, Think about it every time you put gas in your car or the phone rings and you have a loved one in Iraq.

    We are in this together.

    Un Abrazo
    Joe M. Perez-Chair-T.U.L.A.

  • Rocha's Friends Respond to 'No Bill' of Cop who Killed Him

    By Greg Moses

    Sarah and Roxanne knew Daniel Rocha in high school, so at the press
    conference called by Poder, LULAC, and the ACLU, they shared a sign
    protesting the grand jury’s decision to issue no indictments against
    the police officer who
    killed him. Both Sarah and Roxanne say the same thing about the
    situation: "Daniel was a small guy."

    "Daniel was pretty cool," says Roxanne. "I had a dance class with his girlfriend, so he was always at the
    door waiting for her. He always had a smile on his face. He
    was always making everyone laugh. He would tell a lot of jokes." That was back in 2003 before Roxanne had her little girl,
    Justice. "Her dad named her that." In fact, Sarah and Roxanne, who are cousins,
    were at the courthouse Tuesday so that Justice could visit her dad
    at the county jail. He’s been there for a couple of months, but
    he should hopefully be getting out later this week.

    Anyway, when the cousins saw what the protest was about they said to
    each other, "let’s stay out here." At first there were enough
    signs so that Roxanne and Sarah could each hold one, but then a guy
    came to the protest who didn’t have a sign, so Roxanne gave him hers,
    and after that she shared Sarah’s, all the while holding Justice on
    her shoulder.

    According to reports coming out of the courthouse Tuesday, the officer
    told the Grand Jury how she had lost her taser while pushing Daniel to
    the ground and feared that if he had the taser, he might use it against
    another police officer at the scene and take that officer’s gun. "I
    have been in a number of fights before and never have I felt this
    scared and afraid. Instinctively, I grabbed for my gun and shot him
    once. Self-preservation took over."

    One news report Tuesday night stated matter of factly that Rocha "was
    shot in the back as he stood over another officer who had fallen during
    the fight." But witnesses reported that the officer who did the
    shooting was standing over Daniel when she pulled the trigger. And Daniel was "already on the ground."

    Says attorney Bobby Taylor in behalf of the Rocha family: "What we’re
    being told is that the officer did not know where her Taser was, and that’s
    the justification for shooting him in the back. That’s the
    justification for it. That’s it. She did not see him with it. He did
    not threaten her. If I were a police officer I’d feel pretty
    comfortable in doing whatever the world I wanted to do."

    The Police Officers Association sees it as fair warning: "I think it
    tells people, ‘Don’t fight the police when we’re out there trying to do
    our job.’ I think the public and the law states that you have to comply
    with the officers," said the association’s rep.

    Buried under Tuesday’s events was the memory that of three cop cars at
    the scene that night, none of them was able to produce the required
    video tape. One machine was empty, one malfunctioned, and the third car arrived too late, said police.

    At any rate, says Sarah, "There were two cops there, and Daniel was a
    little guy." The Grand Jury, she thinks, is "full of themselves."
    Their decision to issue no indictments really, really, really upsets
    her. "They have all the evidence there, but like a friend of mine
    says, guns don’t kill people, police kill people. He wasn’t that
    big."

    "I’m not going to lie to you," says Sarah when I ask her about
    Daniel. "He was a good guy, but I’m not going to say he didn’t
    have some bad times. He was in and out of juvenile. Some
    was for drug charges." As she sees it, Daniel drifted into hard
    company in a hard neighborhood, he had no dad, but he cared.

    For example, the last class she shared with Daniel was a self-paced
    computer lab where students could make up for classes they had not yet
    passed. Daniel was doing some math there. Sarah was doing
    some history. She recalls that he was concentrating on his work, but he
    would get up and start dancing now and then.

    She remembers in early March that Daniel took his camera
    to school and talked about pictures that he had taken of his mom. "I
    love my mom so much," she recalls Daniel saying. "I know I’m
    stressing her out really bad. I need to stop." But soon after that he
    got into a fight, which caused him more trouble at school. They didn’t let him graduate.

    Sarah senses that living in a troubled neighborhood is a double threat
    to kids like Daniel. There’s the trouble they can get into, and
    there’s the trouble that people will think they are up to, whether or
    not they are. She thinks that because Daniel was caught in a car
    that had just driven out of a poor neighborhood that "the cops took it
    the wrong way."

    Police say the car had been spotted in a drug transaction while under
    surveillance, but Sarah asks if the car was under surveillance, why
    weren’t the police better prepared for the stop? If this was a
    planned drug trap in the first place, why was it handled like a
    routine traffic stop, three suspects, two cops? And the missing video tapes? "Maybe
    if there was one car and that video didn’t work, but all of them?
    I don’t believe that."

    For Sarah, there is an attitude of suspicion that cops bring to the
    neighborhood that makes her angry. It also makes her worry about
    baby Justice, who also lives in a troubled part of town. "What if
    one day she’s at the wrong place at the wrong time. Just because
    she has black in her, just because she’s Hispanic, just because she’s a
    different color…"

    But most of all she wants the world to know that Daniel had not yet
    given up on himself. "He had dreams. He was trying to take
    care of his mom. He had goals set for himself." Daniel
    talked about starting his own clothing line named D-Roch that would
    feature jerseys, shoes, and pants. He dressed like he cared about his
    clothes.

    "If it was raining," says Sarah, "and if he was wearing new shoes, he
    would wear bags over his shoes." Over the telephone I hear a
    little puffing sound as Sarah laughs through her nose. That was
    Daniel, not too proud to wear bags on his shoes in the rain. "He
    took real good care of himself. I really want you to put it out
    there that he wasn’t a bad person."