Category: Uncategorized

  • DREAM Act: Waking up to Immigration

    Each year, 65,000 undocumented students graduate from our nation’s high
    schools. Brought by their parents as young children, many have grown up
    in the United States, attended U.S. K-12 schools, and share in our
    American culture and values. Some have little memory of their homeland
    or their native language. Like their U.S.-born peers, these individuals
    share the same dream of pursuing a higher education. Unfortunately, due
    to their immigration status, they are typically barred from many of the
    opportunities that currently make a college education affordable –
    in-state tuition rates, state and federal grants and loans, private
    scholarships, and the ability to work legally to earn their way through
    college. In effect, through no act of their own, they are denied the
    opportunity to share in the "American Dream." If passed, the “Development, Relief, and Education for Alien
    Minors (DREAM) Act,” S. 2075, a bipartisan federal proposal led by
    Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL), Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and Richard Lugar
    (R-IN), would facilitate access to postsecondary educational
    opportunities for immigrant students in the United States who currently
    face barriers in pursuing a college education. The “DREAM Act” would
    also allow hardworking immigrant youth who have long resided in the
    U.S. the chance to adjust their status, enabling them to contribute
    fully to our society.

    The “DREAM Act” was introduced in the U.S. Senate in November
    2005. Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) is the sponsor of the bill, and the
    lead Republican cosponsors are Senators Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Richard
    Lugar (R-IN). The Senate Judiciary Committee must now consider and
    approve the “DREAM Act” before the bill can be considered for a vote by
    the full Senate. Similar versions of this bill garnered significant
    support from both Democrats and Republicans last Congress when it was
    approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee with a 16-3 bipartisan vote.
    In addition, last year, 48 senators and 153 representatives signed on
    in support of the “DREAM Act” and its companion bill in the U.S. House
    of Representatives. The House version of the “DREAM Act”, which has
    been championed by Representatives Chris Cannon (R-UT), Howard Berman
    (D-CA), and Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), currently awaits
    reintroduction.

    NCLR Position


    The National Council of La Raza (NCLR)

    urges passage of the “DREAM Act,” S. 2075. The “DREAM Act,” which
    provides a path to U.S. citizenship for hardworking and talented
    immigrant students who have been raised in the U.S., is critical to
    improving the pipeline from high school to college and providing
    meaningful employment for Latinos.

  • Statement from a 24-year-old Witness

    I was standing outside of my friend [G’s name withheld by editor]
    house. She lives two or three duplexes away from me. I saw
    a suburban pull up to a stop sign. The officers pulled in front
    of it. They all got out. One of the officers yelled, "don’t
    run Ricky." A person ran. It was a young boy,
    tennager. I didn’t see him. A female officer took off after
    the one who ran. About a minute later she brought him back.
    The female officer was wearing shorts. She had blond hair.
    She walked back from by the Suburban, he didn’t make it that far.
    I’m sure it was the same person who ran. The other officers were
    with the other guy in the Suburban. He was still in the Suburban,
    in the driver’s side. They were standing on the driver’s
    side. The blond officer was on the passenger side with the other
    boy. She was the only female officer out there.

    She was by the stop sign and she put the boy down. Me and [G]
    were walking back towards my house. We were by a metal
    fence. The metal fence meets up with the stop sign sort of.
    I live across from Quicksilver. We were on the opposite side of
    the street from where the Suburban was.

    Det. Walker asked me if I saw a fight or struggle. No, I saw the
    officer holding the man with one hand, the left, and she had her gun
    with her right. All I could see was his shoulder that she had him
    by. I couldn’t tell which shoulder. Then her gun fired
    once. She was standing up, kind of hunched over, and he was
    already on the ground. I saw the fire come out of the officer’s
    gun….

    Signed and notarized June 10, 2005

  • Affidavit of Julie Schroeder — Part Two (pages 4-6)

    As we are waiting, [Y] said a brown suburban had pulled up and [X] had
    come out and went up to the brown suburban and was making the
    deal. Both the brown suburban and the [description withheld by
    editor] truck leave [X’s] house. We were waiting for [Y] to call
    the deal but we missed the take down. Sgt. Doyle follows the
    brown suburban and [A & B] follow the [description withheld by
    editor] truck. The suburban goes south on Bluff Springs to
    Quicksilver. [Y] had given the license plate on the
    suburban. The plate comes back to an address on Vinehill.
    We were thinking it was the same people from the Honeybee area.
    We knew Sgt. Doyle was already following the suburban so we were going
    to intercept the vehicle by going down south on on Pleasant Valley to
    Quicksilver. [Y] came up on the radio and asked if we had written
    the license plate down and I had written the license plate on my hand
    and Michelle was running it on the computer.

    I make a right on Quicksilver from S. Pleasant Valley and at the same
    time Sgt. Doyle is on the radio and he said he had not made a stop on
    the vehicle. I see the suburban and Sgt. Doyle is in his white unmarked
    vehicle behind the suburban. I backed my car up and saw them come
    to the stop sign. I told Michelle I was making the stop. I
    decided to come in diagonally on them. My intention was not to
    block them but to make it as safe as possible to make the stop. I
    hit my emergency red and blue dash lights. Michelle was getting
    out of the car and at the same time I used my spotlight and lit up the
    inside of the car. I saw four people in the suburban. One
    driver, one front seat passenger, one left rear passenger and one right
    rear passenger. The right rear passenger got out and jumped a
    privacy fence. I had yelled "[C name withheld by editor]" to the
    guy that scaled the fence. I knew I had no chance of catching him
    but yelled this anyway to let him know I knew who he was. I don’t
    know if this other guy was [C]. I heard Michelle say, "Rocha,
    Rocha stay in the car." The spot light was lighting through the
    car and I immediately recognized Daniel Rocha. Rocha was in the
    second row. He had scooted over near the right rear passenger
    seat. He had been sitting across from the guy who fled. I
    knew who he was because we had been looking for him and I knew he had a
    theft from person warrant. I had spoken to [D name withheld by
    editor] and the case was about Rocha taking a ladies wallet from her
    possession at a McDonald’s. I knew there was a get away car
    involved in the theft from person case but I don’t remember what kind
    of car it was. I had no information that Rocha was associated
    with the suburban that we just stopped. Michelle had gone to the
    driver’s side but I was completely focused on Rocha. I don’t know
    what happened to the front passenger.

    I went to the rear passenger door. The stop sign is behind me and
    there is a curb in between the suburban and the sidewalk. I’m
    pretty sure I open the rear passenger door. I’m thinking I need
    to contain him inside the vehicle because I don’t want him to fight and
    run. I’m trying to keep him in the suburban. Both my hands
    are empty. I usually carry a small flashlight in the cargo pocket
    of my pants. I had opened the door and was leaning inside the
    vehicle. He had scooted to the spot nearly behind the front
    passenger seat. There is no doubt in my mind that he knew I was a
    cop and no doubt in my mind that he knew I knew who he was. I
    don’t remember exactly what I was telling him. I said his name a
    couple of times. I think I told him he had a warrant. I
    went to feel his body, initially he was relaxed and cooperating and he
    was raising his hands and asking me what was going on, he was also
    moving into me and toward the door. I was definitely blocking the
    door. All of a sudden he tenses up and then he lunged at
    me. The fight is on. He was grabbing at my chest and
    body. He is using his force to try to get past me. He was
    doing everything he could to get past me by muscling me. I wear a
    police vest that has POLICE on the right upper chest area. There
    are two velcro pockets on the front of the vest. In my right
    pocket I have my taser that is Velcro’s in and in the left pocket I had
    my badge pinned to the outside and a blue folding knife in it.
    Rocha had his hands up near my head and upper body when he tensed up
    and started fighting. The fight was happening while still inside
    the vehicle. I’m trying to keep him in the vehicle and he
    overpowered me and he got his legs out first. He spins out toward
    the rear of the suburban as I’m still trying to hold onto him. I
    saw Sgt. Doyle run up from the rear and grab Rocha’s back or right
    side. Sgt. Was on the opposite side I was on. Rocha was
    fighting very hard. Sgt. was trying to get control of Rocha’s
    torso while I was trying to get control of body too. My back was
    to the suburban and both Sgt and I were trying to get Rocha onto the
    ground. It’s been my experience that if we could get him to the
    ground it was to our advantage to get the person handcuffed.
    Rocha and I are on the ground and we are fully engaged in a
    fight. I was on my knees and I have bruises. By this time,
    Sgt. Doyle was no longer engaged with Rocha. I think Sgt. Fell
    and ended up to the far left of where Rocha and I were. I would
    describe it as a fight and wrestling match. His arms are on the
    inside of me and I could feel him grabbing at my vest and waist.
    He [w]as in my upper body and arms. There was no time to get the
    handcuffs out or anything else because we were fighting so hard.
    I remeber thinking two of us can’t even get this guy to the ground and
    we were fighting so hard with him.

    Sgt. Doyle was off to the side. Rocha’s body comes off me and
    lunges toward Sgt. Doyle. I’m pawing at my vest to look for my
    taser I was still on my knees as I was looking for my taser. I
    was looking for it to use on Rocha. Rocha’s body was off to my
    left side but now he was on top of my boss. I could see Sgt.
    Doyle and Rocha fighting. Sgt. Doyle had on blue jeans, dark
    shirt and police raid vest. I think Sgt. Was tilted back or on
    his side. I couldn’t see Sgt. Face. He was to the left of
    Rocha. I was scared for my life and for my boss’ life. I
    was worried about Rocha using my taser and using it on my boss and
    taking his gun. I have been in a number of fights before and
    never have I felt this scared and afraid. I was focued on Rocha’s
    white shirt. I felt for my taser and it was gone, I couldn’t see
    Rocha’s hands as he was fighting with Sgt. Doyle. Instinctively I
    grabbed for my gun and shot him once. I think I shot him in the
    back left shoulder. I only shot him once. Self-preservation
    took over.

    I yelled to Sgt. "I shot him, I shot him." Sgt. Went to Rocha and
    turned him over. When I shot him, Rocha lunged forward and then
    fell. Rocha was face down. Sgt. rolls Rocha over and said
    something to him. Sgt. got on the radio and called for
    assistance. I walked around and ripped my vest off and laid it on
    the trunk of my car. I put the gun on the trunk of my car and I
    don’t remember re-holstering my gun. I remember feeling for my
    gun and couldn’t find it and later [Y] told me it was in the front seat
    of my car. I remember seeing my gun on the driver’s seat of my
    car. I don’t remember if an officer came up and took the gun from
    me. They must have taken it off the trunk of the car. I
    remember putting it on the trunk and just remember wanting to put it
    down.

    Very quickly everyone was there…..

    Signed and notarized June 10, 2005

  • How to Cool Your Heels in Texas When It's Late July All Over the World

    By Greg Moses

    Indymedia Austin / Counterpunch

    On a hot day in July the chamber of the Texas Senate turns out to be a
    great place to catch some A/C and think about how there are two
    monuments to Confederate heroes on the front lawn of the Capitol.

    Read that Southmost monument carefully. The
    only reason they lost that war, explains the marble script, was because the Heroes were outnumbered six to
    one. It never was a fair fight, and the monument testifies that the Heroes never lost it.

    The Heroes put 400,000 lives on
    the line, but so did the Northern Aggressors, so the Heroes had not
    another 400,000 to waste, but the Northern Aggressors did. Jesus,
    what a bloody mess. In 1901, they were not at all ready to let that one
    go, so they built another monument on the South Capitol lawn.

    And even today, over my bar-b-que lunch I see a fellow
    diner in a Confederate flag
    t-shirt. Here we are at Ben’s Long Branch Bar-B-Que on East 11th Street, where they
    serve Soul Food Wednesdays. And in walks this confederate
    flag. Do
    these fights never go away?

    To comment on this article please go to the comment blog.
    These are the things you can ponder as you stare at the chandeliers
    round about 1:30 PM Thursday, as the titans of the Democratic Party
    huddle on the Senate floor, having no company to keep with
    Republicans who were huddled somewhere out of sight.

    In the huddle that you could see, there were, among others, Gonzalo Barrientos, the long-time survivor from Austin; John
    Whitmire, the filibusterer from North Houston; Royce West, the
    education whip, hobbling around with a kind of cast on his left
    leg no less (it was West wasn’t it with the cast? if I’d known that was
    going to be the best image of the day, I’d have taken notes); and
    Eliiot Shapleigh, the one who will tell you plain out
    that Texas would do much better having an income tax.

    Other than that, all we see in terms of Senators is one guy on the Right side of the aisle cruising
    Google Earth in search of various properties that we up in the gallery
    suppose that he owns.

    Everybody could see that these hapless pols weren’t part of the back-room deal making that,
    by day’s end, would be sure enough promised to deliver the Senate this time once more,
    yeah sure, to successful conclusion on education policy.

    When Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst walked out to rationalize for
    the press, you could see that it was gonna be a little more talk and a
    lot less action. Not a bad time to get a
    Starbuck’s coffee, read the New York Times article about Rumsfeld in
    Baghdad, and cross your fingers about mid-term elections next year.

    It also
    helps to sit near lobbyists. "There she
    goes back to her office," said two well-heeled suits at the same time,
    indicating a well-placed staffer who smiled briefly into the galleries
    before disappearing. "It’s going to be awhile," they agreed.

    But can you believe it? Not one, but two monuments to the Confederacy out
    front? The history of this legislature is surely written in
    granite priorities outside.

    I had time to mosey through the monuments Thursday morning, being as how I
    was early to the Latino Coalition’s press conference, and even after
    circling both Civil War monuments, I was still early enough to catch the
    MALDEF team standing alone at the South Steps.

    David Hinojosa, Luis Figueroa, and an intern were staking out the
    territory for this morning’s announcement of a six-point plan–a simple
    way of reminding Texas what a good education bill would look
    like–one that wouldn’t require court intervention either.

    "They say we’re out of ideas and we only oppose bills," said
    Figueroa. "So we’re here to show them the ideas that we’re for."

    "People have asked whether no bill would be better than a bad bill," said Hinojosa. "But what about a great bill?"

    A great education bill would:

    (1) Equalize Funding so that all children would share the wealth regardless of where they are born.

    (2) Make sure facilities are up-to-date, a need that remains unmet in
    many of MALDEF’s client districts in the
    latest round of education litigation.

    (3) Fund realistic "weights" for the education of English Language
    Learners (15 percent of all students) and Low Income Children (50
    percent, yes half of all Texas Students are Low Income). These
    students need a forty percent increase right away.

    (4) Pay teachers good wages. The Southwest Workers Union was on
    hand Thursday morning with signs asking, "Living Wages for School Workers",
    and a huge banner demanding: "Mandamos Justicia".

    (5) Accountability without high stakes testing. As the press kit

    explained, many students take tests that assume they have been taught the
    material in the first place by obedient if not qualified teachers.

    (6) And finally (because there are only really five things that the
    legislature refuses to do, not six) why not give the kids of Texas a
    chance to excel in
    education. Give them the education they need to rank among the top
    tiers of their
    globalized peers. Wouldn’t that be the kind of thing a state
    would want for its kids? Isn’t this the kind of things heroes
    fight for?

    But what does any of this have to do with tax cuts, you ask?
    And aren’t tax cuts the one thing that legislators have to bring back
    to their voters this year? The MALDEF team
    takes no official line on taxes, but they have noticed that cutting
    taxes is much more important to this legislature than doing six (or five) good
    things for education. But who hasn’t noticed that?

    The message of the Latino Coalition is crisp and bright. But it ain’t a
    cheap message, that’s for sure. And Texas voters are having
    difficulty rising to level of maturity required to say: children first.

    By afternoon Thursday, it’s not clear that any of this Latino Coalition
    sunshine has penetrated into the carpeted hush of Senate chambers where
    up at the gallery level children come and go quickly with their
    vacationing parents. It’s not a bad space to be walking around or
    sitting around as the July sun climbs up the ladder outside.

    A dozen blocks away at City Hall I tug on the first door handle, my
    body looking forward to the whoosh of chilled air, but what’s that
    noise? Turns out that door handle is unauthorized entrance and I’ve
    just set
    off an intruder alert. A guy is wagging his finger at me. I don’t
    wait for him to finish his sentence. I step back out into the
    heat. Great. Shows you how well I know
    City Hall these days.

    Okay so back out the door and around through the metal detector and
    x-ray, probably a video tape, too. Here I don’t set off any
    alarms, so I go stand by the Chief of Police for a second while I
    search for a seat.

    Councilmember Brewster McCracken is looking over the freshly drafted
    city budget and trying to come to grips with the fact that the city is
    headed toward a police state far as the eye can see. Of course,
    that’s not the way he says it exactly. But he notices that the
    police portion of the city budget is up to 75 percent and
    climbing.

    Give us a decade, and we’ll all be working for the
    police union, while not doing jobs like librarian, park maintenance,
    after school programs, health care–you know, all that socialist
    nonsense that we began to finally outgrow round about 1980.

    So I’m not unhappy to go out and join the socialists, anarchists,
    greens, poets, artists, and possibly even Democrats who have gathered
    along Cesar Chavez Street this aftern

    oon to protest the killing of
    18-year-old Daniel Rocha, who, according to the sign I was holding, was
    shot in the back at point blank range. He was unarmed at the
    time, although possibly guilty of having smoked a reefer two hours
    earlier, if you believe the revised toxicology report, which folks out
    here with signs aren’t really wanting to to.

    And even if Rocha had
    been stoned two hours earlier, so what? I mean you go around
    killing previously stoned people in Austin, Texas? No wonder
    Willie is keeping a heavy touring schedule these days.

    Back inside the building, Councilmember Danny Thomas wants to know how
    police get a 2.7 customer satisfaction rating? Those are the
    kinds of questions you can sincerely wonder about in there with your
    air conditioners humming, behind your security screens, as you pass out
    an award to the cop who killed a mentally deranged woman who was
    threatening someone with a knife. Today it is official, that the
    cop has been cleared by the feds, so he is a hero, he saved a
    life. Now on to the Rocha killing.

    And, um, I forget, what
    was that question you asked Mr. Thomas? Oh right. Why are people who
    are not federal agents or Councilmembers not impressed with police
    today? And I know you didn’t ask this, but why won’t they–even
    in the face of what a police state looks like–raise taxes for
    education?

    "Money for jobs and ed-u-ca-tion. Not more po-lice
    oc-cu-pa-tion." I put down my sign and make a note of this
    chant. Sort of sums up my day. Two standing monuments to Confederate Heroes, can
    you believe it?