Category: Uncategorized

  • MEChA Facts and Myths: Further Thoughts on Mr. Jones

    By Greg Moses

    As we await Alex Jones’ promised sequels to his report from the Diez y
    Seis rally, a review of links at Azteca net suggests that preliminary
    reports from Mr. Jones appear to be based on a 2003 smear campaign
    against California’s Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, whose college membership
    in MEChA was turned against him during his campaign for Governor of
    California. As argued
    by Jorge Mariscal, the scare tactics used by familiar pundits against
    MEChA have a legacy in Anti-Mexican hate groups. See also: Mecha
    Facts and Myths by Ralph de Unamuno at azteca.net

    Alex Jones is a Minuteman sympathizer who
    sees the US-Mexico border in terms of a war zone. On the Alex
    Jones radio show today (Sept. 22) he encouraged his audience to help
    him get some Minutemen guests on his show, explaining that his direct
    calls to the organization have not been very successful. He pleaded
    with his audience to remind the Minutemen that Alex, "is having rallies
    to defend you!" Apparently, some of the Minutemen treat Mr. Jones
    as a lightweight. Meanwhile, standing among
    the protesters who demonstrated with or merely alongside Mr. Jones
    Saturday were people with signs demanding "Mexico Out of USA" and "One
    Nation One Language". Whenever people who keep such company shout
    loudly about "Mexican Supremacism" we have a right to wonder what
    bothers them most: supremacism or Mexican?
    In keeping with our general method of approach, to not
    multiply disputes, I enjoyed hearing Mr. Jones today jealously guard
    the liberties of USA citizens against powerful government
    encroachments. What puzzles me is why Mr. Jones would support
    efforts by citizens to extend the power of the state over the freedoms
    of migrants. It seems the puzzle is solved so long as one draws a
    very bright line around who does and who does not count as a person
    with rights. And so long as Mr. Jones seeks to cultivate favor
    with fellow demonstrators and organizations who prefer to draw bright
    lines between Mexicans and the USA, we have a difficult time
    understanding why he gets so miffed at the very idea that others might
    appropriate his bright line schema, only to reverse the hierarchy of power.

    A framework of human and civil rights is the better alternative, and
    that’s why we won’t support one supremacist who stands in the favored
    circle condemning the alleged existence of would-be supremacists who
    would only reverse the
    power dynamic between groups already separated by Mr. Jones’ bright
    line. In this sort of sordid atmosphere, we wonder, why
    Mr.
    Jones, did you stand with or merely beside an obviously supremacist
    outpouring on a day of Mexican-American celebration? You say it was to
    expose extremist hate groups within the Mexican-American community. But
    given the company you stood with–and the supremacist exclusions they
    represent in their plain sign language–what gives you the right to
    complain about supremacism of any sort?

    —–

    Note: "In parts two and three, I will detail the long trail of horrors that I
    witnessed as well as posting a lengthy video report documenting our
    claims. We have ten hours of footage from four cameras, which includes
    people frothing and screaming racist comments and then calling us
    racists for saying that we should all live together in peace."–Alex
    Jones

  • Affidavit from X [name withheld by editor]

    Subject says she bought two rocks of crack from the guy who later leaped the fence.

  • Affidavit from Second Witness

    I was walking on Pleasant Valley and had stopped near the fire hydrant
    when I saw the police car stop in front of the stop sign. I saw
    this guy run from the suburban and a white unmarked police car went
    after him and brought him back after I had heard the shot. I
    really didn’t get a good look at this guy but he had facial hair and
    dark long hair pulled back like a pony tail. I think he was
    Hispanic and may have been 22 years old.

    I saw the female officer telling this other Hispanic guy to "get on the
    ground." I think she told him once or twice. They were on
    the passenger side of the suburban near tall grass. They were
    actually between the sidewalk and the street curb. I hear the guy
    say "weapon" but I didn’t see anything in his hands. I saw him
    get on his hands and knees and saw the female officer with her left
    hand trying to put him on the ground and she was kinda kneeling with
    her left hand and knee. I saw her with a gun in her right
    hand. I saw he was lying flat. I don’t know if the guy was
    fighting with the officer or resisting because I did not see
    that. I thought that the police were going to arrest him and put
    him up. I walked off back to my house but then I heard a shot….

    Signed and notarized June 10, 2005

  • But Do They Serve Grits for Breakfast?

    "About 1,900 inmates currently sleep on the floor in the Harris County
    Jail drawing the ire of the Texas Commission on Jail Standards," writes
    Scott Henson, in his first report on the overcrowding problem.
    "According to a recent consultant’s report (Word document), a major
    reason is clear: A shift in bail policy over the last decade to require
    cash bond in more cases instead of personal bond, or releasing
    defendants on their promise to later appear in court. Half of all
    inmates presently in the Harris County Jail are awaiting trial; a large
    proportion couldn’t make bail."

    Writes Henson: "Though other factors are also at play, much of the
    Harris County Jail’s overincarceration crisis can be explained by this
    shift in policy. In other words, Harris County’s jail overcrowding
    crisis is a self-inflicted wound."

    "In the last ten years, the number of misdemeanor defendants who were
    ordered to pay bail instead of being released on "personal bond"
    increased more than 30,000%! No, that’s not a typo: It increased more
    than thirty thousand percent!"

    For the rest, get your Grits for Breakfast here. This is what we call criminalization with civil rights implications,
    since we feel like the problem wouldn’t grow so fast if it concerned
    white kids in the suburbs, in other words, there is no evidence that
    the refusal to grant personal bonds is tied to actual risks of
    defendants not showing up.  So if there is no rational basis, we tender the hypothesis of racist bias.–gm