Category: Uncategorized

  • A Texas Growth Economy: From Shopping and Eating Out to Global Transport

    By Greg Moses

    As folks debate ways to pump the economy, November employment statistics remind us that

    83 percent of nonfarm workers in Texas earn paychecks in the private sector.

    Of the 10.7 million workers (nonfarm, not seasonally adjusted), 8.9 million are private

    sector compared to 1.8 million government workers.

    While it may be possible for government to pick up masses of workers to labor on roads,

    bridges, and parks, or in emergency rooms, health clinics, and schools, there seems to be

    obvious truth in the worry that this plan of action would raise taxes.

    Still we should note that of the 32,700 net new jobs (actual, not seasonally adjusted)

    added to Texas payrolls in November of 2008, at least 12,000 (or 37 percent) were added by

    government, overwhelmingly at the local level.

    Since there is no income tax in Texas, these jobs were funded by sales taxes and property

    taxes. And while it does seem obvious that every new government job is to be counted as an

    absolute increase in public tax burden, we’d like to remember some old sayings about ounces

    of prevention.

    After all, what sort of private sector employer is going to stick around very long in a

    territory where taxpayers have pulled down their liabilities to zero by de-funding every

    conceivable public service. Even the famous Laffer curve assumes that taxation has some

    optimal rate.

    From the point of view of civil rights development, it would be a cruel and unusual

    economy that sets no public standards whatsoever to live by.

    Nevertheless, let’s remember that 83 percent of the existing workforce in Texas does not

    go to work for a government paycheck.

    Now we’re going to leave aside the question of how many private workers depend upon a

    government contract. So our KBR readers should not go around thinking that we ignore all

    the public butter that gets spread on private bread.

    But let’s go where the majority of workers live and try to prosper — in the private

    sector.

    It’s interesting in Texas that there are about as many workers in the “Goods Producing”

    sector of the economy as there are in “Government” — about 1.8 million. But whereas the

    government sector grew in November, the goods producing sector shrank (by about 6,000

    jobs).

    Not all parts of the goods producing sector lost jobs. In mining and oil and gas, about

    a 1,000 new jobs were added.

    Texas construction lost only a couple of hundred jobs, but the story would have been

    worse if not for “Utility System Construction” which added 1,000 jobs. How much of that

    private employment on utility systems depended upon public financing we’ll leave open to

    further questioning.

    Manufacturing, as you might guess, is still losing jobs in Texas. About 2,000 jobs were

    lost in this sector during November, with losses in the wood, computer, and electronics

    areas. We now have 924,800 manufacturing jobs left here.

    It’s interesting to see that some sectors of manufacturing actually grew: “Fabricated

    Metal Product Manufacturing” picked up 300 jobs; “Machinery Manufacturing” picked up 200

    jobs; “Agriculture, Construction, and Mining Machinery Manufacturing” picked up 500 jobs;

    “Transportation Equipment Manufacturing” picked up 500 jobs; and “Aerospace Product and

    Parts Manufacturing” picked up 400 jobs.

    No doubt there is some “public sector” contracting in these sophisticated heavy metal

    operations in Texas, although I’m guessing we could wish for a healthier mix of “peace” to

    “war” priorities.

    When it comes to non-durable goods, Texas employed some 308,200 workers in November,

    which is 700 fewer workers than October. It was a bad month for food (-400), plastics (-

    200), and paper (-200). But a better month for animal slaughtering (+100) and products made

    from petroleum and coal (+700) and chemicals (+200).

    In the private sector, “Service” is the mammoth sector of the Texas economy. That’s

    where 7.1 million workers were employed in November, an increase of 26,700 workers over

    October. About 20,000 of those new jobs were split between clotting stores and department

    stores. Another 5,000 jobs were added by “Other General Merchandise Stores.”

    Information services fell by another 400 jobs, which is why you see more people like me

    doing this grunt work for free (actually, the newspaper people are holding the line; nothing

    lost, nothing gained).

    In the “Finance and Insurance” sector, jobs are down slightly overall (-200), but there

    is a growth niche in “Credit Intermediation,” which added 1,100 jobs.

    In the professional services sector, lawyers, accountants, architects, and computer

    experts are all finding fewer cubicles available.

    Education and health care, on the other hand, are growing modestly; while “Leisure and

    Hospitality” continue their slow decline.

    In Texas, we are pleased to report, “Food Services and Drinking Places” are still “help

    wanted” areas, with 2,500 new jobs added in November, 2008.

    So if you want to help grow jobs in the Texas economy, especially if you’re a government

    worker, go out and buy some new clothes, steer a shopping cart through your neighborhood

    department store, and take the family out for dinner and drinks. And don’t forget to tip as

    if it was your own salary you were figuring up.

    Beyond these sorts of stopgap subsidies that we can share with each other, there do seem

    to be some healthy fundamentals in the current economic profile in Texas, considering that

    heavy machinery is growing jobs along with education and health services.

    And when you think about all the experience that Texans accrue getting from one end of

    the state to the other, why shouldn’t Texas step up to global leadership in the design,

    management, and manufacture of transportation systems and services? Couldn’t we teach

    ourselves to travel in ways that would prepare us to teach the world?

    Oh, and remember not to shoplift. However, if you can look like you might be shoplifting could it create more jobs for security guards? Check out Grits for Breakfast on the shoplifting rate.

  • Caterpillar Coming to Seguin

    AUSTIN – Gov. Rick Perry, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and Speaker Tom Craddick today announced that Caterpillar Inc., a Fortune 50 company, will move one of its primary global assembly, test & paint facilities to Seguin, Texas, creating more than 1,400 jobs. Texas was in competition with South Carolina and Mexico for this facility. Full Press Release.

  • Dallas Fed Expectations Moving toward 2010

    In the January 14 release of the Beige Book, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas reports downturns in all major areas of the regional economy, along with widespread expectations that conditions will continue to worsen.

    “Most respondents don’t expect conditions to improve until the second half of 2009 with a growing number of respondents now looking at early 2010,” says the report from the Dallas Fed.

  • Dallas Fed Chief Defends ''Left Side'' Strategy

    Excerpt from today’s speech by Dallas Fed chief Richard W. Fisher.

    In rapid order, over the course of a year, we took at least eight major initiatives:

    (1) We established a lending facility for primary securities dealers, taking in new forms of collateral to secure those loans;

    (2) we initiated so-called swap lines with the central banks of 14 of our major trading partners, ranging from the European Central Bank to the Bank of Canada and the Banco de México to the Monetary Authority of Singapore, to alleviate dollar funding problems in those markets;

    (3) we created facilities to backstop money market mutual funds;

    (4) working with the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC, we initiated new measures to strengthen the security of certain banks;

    (5) we undertook a major program to purchase commercial paper, a critical component of the financial system;

    (6) we began to pay interest on reserves of banks;

    (7) we announced a new facility to support the issuance of asset-backed securities collateralized by student loans, auto loans, credit card loans and loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration;

    and (8) at the end of November, we announced we stood ready to purchase up to $100 billion of the direct obligations of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks, as well as $500 billion in mortgage-backed securities backed by Fannie, Freddie and Ginnie Mae.

    And, as you all know, in a series of steps, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) reduced the fed funds rate, a process which I fully supported once it became clear that the inflationary tide was ebbing. Simultaneously, and again in a series of steps, the Board of Governors lowered the rate it charges banks to borrow from our “discount window” so as to lower their cost of credit. That rate now rests at 0.5 percent.

    All of this has meant expanding our balance sheet. [L]ast Friday night, the total footings of the Federal Reserve had expanded to $2.254 trillion–an almost three-fold increase from when we started the year. And I believe we made it quite clear in our press release after Monday and Tuesday’s meeting of the FOMC that we stand ready to grow our balance sheet even more should conditions warrant. For example, we will expand purchases of mortgage-backed securities, should we feel such purchases would be productive.

    You will note that the emphasis of our activities has been on expanding the asset side of our balance sheet–the left side, which registers the securities we hold, the loans we make, the value of our swap lines and the credit facilities we have created. We feel this is the correct side to emphasize. The right side of our balance sheet records our holdings of banks’ balances, Federal Reserve Bank notes or cash (currently over $830 billion) and U.S. Treasury balances.

    When the Japanese economy went into the doldrums, the Bank of Japan emphasized the right side of its balance sheet by building up excess reserves and cash, only to find that accumulation did too little to rejuvenate the system.

    As I said earlier, in times of crisis many feel that the best position to take is somewhere between cash and fetal. But it does the economy no good when creditors curl up in a ball and clutch their money. This only reinforces the widening of spreads between risk-free holdings and all-important private sector yields, further braking commercial activity whose lifeblood is access to affordable credit.

    We believe that emphasizing the asset side of the balance sheet will do more to improve the functioning of credit markets and restore the flow of finance to the private sector. In the parlance of central banking finance, I consider this a more qualitative approach to “quantitative easing.” It is bred of having learned from the experience of our Japanese counterparts. . . .

    See full text of Dec. 18, 2008 speech on “Historical Perspectives on the Current Economic and Financial Crisis” as posted at the Dallas Fed web site.