Author: mopress

  • Texas-based Avance Draws Praise (Again) for Transforming Education

    Thanks to Angela Valenzuela’s valuable newsletter, we receive word of a
    serious report on children of immigrants. And the report praises one
    Texas program that for the past 30 years has been proving that social
    trends are not social destiny.

    Valenzuela’s internet work at TexasEdEquity keeps up with research and media attention given to key educational issues. Her email list Wednesday included notice of a new report
    by the National Council of State Legislators addressing the growing
    population of children among immigrants. Statistical trends among
    children of immigrants are not promising, with gaps showing up in
    school performance, graduation, and income levels. But as a nation of
    immigrants should well know, these trends are not destiny, and one
    Texas organization has been showing how to do things right:

    Another
    successful program – Avance, based in Texas –serves predominantly
    low-income Latino families through parent education, early childhood
    development, literacy, and English language acquisition. Despite the
    fact that 91 percent of the parents in the program are high school
    dropouts, 94 percent of their children complete high school, 43 percent
    attend college, and half of the parents continue their education.
    Avance started as a preschool and school readiness program but has also
    been successful in improving parent outcomes. Avance is funded by
    federal, state, county and city governments, United Way, foundations
    and corporations and serves more than 13,000 parents and children
    annually.

    As the web site
    for Avance proudly claims, the core model of the program addresses
    parents of low-income Latino children during pre-school years, offering
    nine months of instruction in "stages of emotional, physical, social
    and cognitive development of their children with special topics that
    range from the importance of reading, effective discipline to
    nutrition. Parents also attend classes in literacy learning English and
    getting their GED."

    For social determinists such as William Bennett (who recently broadcast
    his opinion that abortion could solve the problem of crime) the Avance
    program of Texas proves once again that statistical trends do not
    dictate either destiny or human nature.

    Children from the Avance peer group who are NOT provided
    with these services will be, "5 times more likely to commit crimes by
    age 27, 10 times more likely to be delinquent by age 16, and 4 times
    more likely to be convicted of crime while in high school." But as we
    can see, these differences in outcome are attributable to supplies of
    resources, not to any innate characteristics of the birth populations.

    For
    more information on the difference that community resources can make in
    a child’s chances of life, see the "Avance Works" tab at the
    organization’s web site.

    For state policy makers who would
    empower education to make a difference, the National Council of State
    Legislators references a 2004 report with specific policy choices:


    School-based community centers to support assimilation of immigrant
    families, through English as a Second Language (ESL), parent workshops,
    computer training, translations, and referrals.

    • Newcomer programs that provide intensive language development and academic and cultural orientation.


    Collaborations between educators, religious, and medical personnel with
    religious and cultural leaders in the community to plan programs for
    immigrant families.

    • A five-year high
    school plan for immigrant students arriving too late to complete
    requirements in four years, or who need additional English language
    training.
    • Specialists to assist teachers, for example, in literacy, special education, and ESL.

    • Team teaching between general and special educators and ESL teachers.

    • Alternative certification programs for immigrants who were teachers in their countries of origin.

    As
    the NCSL report shows, there is no reason to wish the children away in
    order to improve social trends. One only needs to vanquish the selfish,
    defeatist, and racist attitudes that stand in the children’s way.

  • Monthly Traffic Up, Up, UP

    Compared to January, our web traffic for September at the Texas
    Civil Rights Review will see a fourfold increase in page hits as
    counted by our statistics module. Meanwhile, the web rating service
    Alexa shows us dropping by 2 million places over the past three months
    in terms of traffic share. I’m not sure how to reconcile the two
    numbers, but I do want to thank you for making TCRR one of your web
    stops.

    Don’t worry, we’re not chasing a mass market here. At TCRR you will
    continue to find news and opinions not covered elsewhere. And if we
    have the choice of expressing opinions that will drive traffic away
    rather than keeping our mouth shut, we’ll post the difficult truth.

    Take a look at the William Bennett commentary, for example. Based on
    readership, it’s one of the more unpopular things we’ve written here in
    a while. But some things need to be said. Bennett’s little thought
    experiment was a contradiction distilled from the soul of whiteness,
    where genocide can be thought to reduce a crime rate, because the
    population that disappears is assumed to have no right to existence in
    the first place.

    The Bush White House calls Bennett’s comments inappropriate, but why?
    Because the Bush White House cherishes the life chances of the African
    American population? Or because it is inappropriate to show one’s cards
    in these high stakes games? See there, we’re doing it again already…. –gm

  • Nine No's for November: Maria Luisa Alvarado

    Let’s review what happened when our state leaders met in Austin in 2005
    to do the work that we elected them to do for us. After the regular
    session and the added expense of two special sessions, they did not even
    come close to solving the key issues facing Texas. After all was said
    and done and facing the competing forces of political fallout and
    constituent demands, the Texas legislature presented Texas voters with a
    consolation prize of nine propositions on the November 8th ballot. Nine
    propositions
    of which not even one is related to the key issues facing
    Texas. As Texas voters, we are faced with a government that has failed us,
    again.

    I believe that Texas voters of all party affiliations see clearly now
    the government waste produced by our state leaders wrapped in
    ideological straight-jackets. The evidence lays in the sum of the accomplishments
    of the past legislative session – nine propositions on the November 8th
    ballot that do not address a single key issue facing Texas. I propose
    that we take the opportunity to voice our discontent with our state
    government leaders on November 8th by voting ‘No’ to all propositions on
    the ballot. By voting ‘No’ to all propositions, we assert our right to
    reject a government that does not serve the people. This is the boldest
    statement every Texas voter can make this November.

    –Excerpts from an email distributed by Alvarado for Texas Lt. Gov.

  • Here Comes the Database

    Contracts and Coffee Next Week

    By Greg Moses

    PinkDome

    Prompted by a newly-posted itinerary for a “HAVA listening tour” scheduled by the Texas Secretary of State in various counties, the Texas Civil Rights Review made a few phone calls today (Mar. 24). We reached three SOS staffers who were very responsive and who provided the following information :

    (1) The present schedule, beginning March 23, was posted March 23. An offline schedule that runs through the end of April does not yet include Dallas County. I have asked for a complete schedule via email.

    (2) The tour is intended to touch base with County Election Officials so they can get the money available to them through HAVA and tell the SOS “what’s working and what’s not working”.

    (3) The TEAM statewide database mandated by HAVA to be completed by Jan. 1 and now under development by IBM and Hart InterCivic is nearing completion of the documentation of “business rules” for software specs.

    As plans now exist, voters will be able to more easily find out online where to vote, but there will be no difference in the registration experience, ie same old cards with HAVA ID requirements for new voters, same need to fill out a new card when you move, etc.

    One source, who spoke on condition of anonymity said Texas would be on the cutting edge of what HAVA requires. Which tells you that HAVA requires nothing FOR the voters.

    TCRR scheduled a time next week to view the TEAM contract (500-600 pages). And we were offered coffee to go with it!

    I didn’t express with any of these staffers my disappointment that the meeting with Harris County officials was posted the same day as the meeting. One staffer assured me that the press had been notified way in advance. Oh, that’s great. Please let me know if you see the story.