Category: Uncategorized

  • Affidavit of Ricardo Villa Ulfeng

    Note: this is the testimony of the passenger who leaped the
    fence. He admits that he was selling marijuana to [X name
    withheld by editor] while under surveillance by undercover cops.

    After doing so, we left and were headed to [D’s name withheld by
    editor] house. He lives off Honey Bee Bend. On the way over
    to [D’s] house, the three of us were smoking a blunt, marijuana.
    We had smoked a couple of blunts. We were on Quicksilver and S.
    Pleasant Valley when I noticed a car behind us. I had not been
    paying attention and did not realize that it was a police officer
    behind us. I then saw an undercover car drive onto Quick Silver
    and then backed up and got in front of the Suburban that we were
    in. I told [E name withheld by editor] and Daniel that I was
    leaving. By that I meant that I was going to take off.

    [E] was driving, I was in the front passenger seat, and Daniel Rocha
    was in the back seat sitting in the center. I immediately opened
    the door and ran out. I started to jump the fence when I heard
    the officer call me by my name and say "Stop Ricky". I remember
    looking back and seeing Daniel’s face looking at me….

    Signed June 30, 2005

  • Latest On Ramsey

    Dear Friends:

    This message is sent to family members and friends
    to provide an update on the medical status of my husband,
    Ramsey Muniz. In a previous message I stated that he had
    shown improvement, but since that time he has again become
    ill. His abdomen area has filled with bile. He has
    infection which is accompanied by fever. Tomorrow
    morning (Monday, September 19) Ramsey will undergo surgery
    which will give doctors a new opportunity to fix the
    source of his illness. We welcome everyone’s prayers,
    and ask God that Ramsey be granted a long awaited recovery.


    Thursday, September 8:
    Ramsey undergoes an ERCP procedure for
    the 3rd time. The doctor removes two stents previously inserted, and
    replaces them with a larger one. He expresses confidence that this will
    solve the problem. When I visit with Ramsey, he is heavily sedated.
    Friday, September 9:
    For the first time Ramsey has eaten an entire cup of cream of wheat. Under the circumstances, this is
    tremendous progress. His face alone reflects improved health.


    Saturday, September 10:
    Early in the morning Ramsey has
    problems breathing and he is given oxygen. In the morning he is taken
    to walk because of the long amount of time that he has spent in bed. I
    visit with him later and he is very weak. He hardly speaks. Because he
    has remained in a lying position for so long, he has developed a very
    painful bed sore.


    Sunday, September 11:
    Ramsey’s abdomen is again filled with
    fluid. He forces himself to walk , in an effort to rid himself of the
    fluid. His liver enzymes are down, which is positive.


    Monday, September 12:
    Ramsey is taken for another paracentesis
    procedure to drain around the stomach area. They remove about
    2 1/2 liters of what appears to be bile. They attempt to do
    hemodialysis, but his catheter is clogged, so dialysis is postponed,
    and they instead repair the catheter.


    Tuesday, September 13:
    Ramsey is given hemodialysis again, as
    his kidneys need to improve. It seems that the antibiotics are
    effective, as his white blood cell count is lowering.

    The physician has ordered a consultation with a surgeon to
    determine if surgery will help.


    Wednesday, September 14:
    Ramsey begins to eat solid food,
    though he remains very ill. His stomach has again filled with bile, but
    the amount seems less. The doctor does not want to resort to surgery,
    and instead wants to wait to see if the fluid can be fought through the
    body’s normal functions. He feels that the stent is just taking longer
    to be effective.


    Thursday, September 15:
    I called the nurse’s station at 5:45
    AM for an update on Ramsey’s status. He has not been feeling well and
    his stomach is bloated but he is sitting up in a chair, in an attempt
    to fight the illness through mobility. His body is extremely tired.


    Friday, September 16:
    I visit with Ramsey and he remains
    very weak. I do everything possible to impart faith, spirituality,
    hope, and strength. He has been told that surgery has been scheduled on
    Monday morning or during the noon hour.


    Saturday, September 17:
    Ramsey remains very weak.


    Sunday, September 18:
    Ramsey remains very weak. We welcome
    prayers from family members and friends, and ask God that Ramsey be
    granted a long awaited recovery.

    Our sincerest gratitude goes to all who have expressed
    compassion, love, and concern, and more importantly to
    those who have said prayers on behalf of my husband.

    Irma Muniz

    Received via email Sept. 18

  • Ramsey Muniz Life Sentence Questioned

    Enclosed is a memorandum sent to Ramsey Muniz
    regarding his legal case. Know that we are
    very encouraged about this information, and
    remain optimistic. Please distribute.
    ==Irma L. Muniz, via Sixth Sun Mailing List

    July 28, 2005

    According to the court, under the sentencing
    guidelines, the offensive level applicable to your
    case was 37, category VI. With this in mind, the court
    found that the punishment in your case was mandatory
    life imprisonment. Under the guidelines (see sentencing
    transcript at p. 29) it appears that this finding is
    incorrect. Level 37 with 9 criminal history points is
    not category 6. It is category 4. (See sentencing table).
    Thus, under category 4, the punishment required by the
    guidelines is not life. It is 292-365 months [24-30 years]. The court
    did it wrong. While this error appears to be harmless, under the
    section 841 enhancement (with 2 prior convictions), the
    contrary is the true. The record does not show that the
    government followed the proper section 851 procedure.
    To apply the section 841 enhancement, the government must
    file a section 851 "notice" before trial (selection of
    the jury). Here, the court’s docket does not show such
    filing. The only "notice" concerning section 851 was
    given at sentencing hearing concerning the enhancement.
    (See sentencing transcript, at page 3). If this is
    true, the government followed the wrong procedure and
    there is law to support this fact. Your sentence of
    life is void because by not filing the section 851
    notice (before the jury selection), the government did
    not give proper jurisdiction to the court. It has no
    jurisdiction over the enhanced penalty of section 841.

    With the available record, it is possible to assume
    that this conclusion is correct. Nevertheless, we must
    be 100 percent sure that this fact is accurate. Send
    this letter, the sentencing transcripts, and the court’s
    docket to Jesse Gamez for corroboration.

    We have a jurisdictional argument for any court, at
    any time, because a jurisdictional issue is never waived
    or restringed by the AedpA’s 1 year time limitation.


    www.freeramsey.com
    For background on Ramsey Muniz, see TCRR special report: Narco Politics vs. Civil Rights.

  • Monthly Traffic Up, Up, UP

    Compared to January, our web traffic for September at the Texas
    Civil Rights Review will see a fourfold increase in page hits as
    counted by our statistics module. Meanwhile, the web rating service
    Alexa shows us dropping by 2 million places over the past three months
    in terms of traffic share. I’m not sure how to reconcile the two
    numbers, but I do want to thank you for making TCRR one of your web
    stops.

    Don’t worry, we’re not chasing a mass market here. At TCRR you will
    continue to find news and opinions not covered elsewhere. And if we
    have the choice of expressing opinions that will drive traffic away
    rather than keeping our mouth shut, we’ll post the difficult truth.

    Take a look at the William Bennett commentary, for example. Based on
    readership, it’s one of the more unpopular things we’ve written here in
    a while. But some things need to be said. Bennett’s little thought
    experiment was a contradiction distilled from the soul of whiteness,
    where genocide can be thought to reduce a crime rate, because the
    population that disappears is assumed to have no right to existence in
    the first place.

    The Bush White House calls Bennett’s comments inappropriate, but why?
    Because the Bush White House cherishes the life chances of the African
    American population? Or because it is inappropriate to show one’s cards
    in these high stakes games? See there, we’re doing it again already…. –gm